“MONSTROUS AND ILLEGAL PROCEEDINGS”: LAW ...
“MONSTROUS AND ILLEGAL PROCEEDINGS”: LAW ... “MONSTROUS AND ILLEGAL PROCEEDINGS”: LAW ...
ordered.” 211 Gándara complained that “there is no plausible reason for the delay.” Gándara’s alarm was well justified. With fraud allegations pending against him in front of a blanco judge, Bica appeared to be using his political connections with the juez de paz to flee. Gándara wrote to Real, stating that the juez de paz “had no interest in pursuing the Dispatch from this tribunal before [Bica’s] evasion to the neighboring province of Corrientes.” 212 During the month-long delay, Bica in fact had shifted most of his fungible assets across the border into Corrientes and out of the Salto court’s jurisdiction. Still determined, Gándara traveled to Paysandú. He requested that the judge there embargo Bica’s remaining goods to cover his commercial debts. In Paysandú, Gándara again pointed to Bica’s reputation. He noted that “the respondent does not have well-known roots here” and “his notorious bad faith makes it likely he will abscond with additional goods.” 213 In short, Bica was an outsider: the opposite of an honorable vecino. He could not be trusted to respect the court’s jurisdiction, his creditors’ rights or his commercial obligations. The court in Paysandú issued a contempt order against Bica. Back in Salto, Real issued a similar demand against Bica and the juez de paz. 214 By then, Bica had crossed into to Corrientes. Bica had escaped, but at the cost of much of his property in the Estado Oriental. Gándara seized possession on behalf of several creditors of Bica’s substantial landholdings. 215 Bica’s commercial operations in the Estado Oriental were crippled. This posed a problem not only for his personal economic situation, but also for that of his factional and familial allies in Alegrete. Recall again that the Ribeiros were engaged in a prolonged battle with Canabarro over political control of the Brazilian borderlands. Each 211 Ibid., 6bis. 212 Ibid. 213 Ibid., 8-8bis. 214 Ibid., 10. 215 Ibid. 248
side sought to dictate the distribution of private law rights on both sides of the border. For the Ribeiros, the loss of an important political ally like Bica posed a substantial problem. They had failed to protect an important ally’s property in the Estado Oriental. Such a reversal threatened to undermine their political power and personal reputations back in Brazil. Much like Miguel Gelabert had suffered economically based on a perceived inability to obtain justice in Mercedes, the judicial defeat of a prominent ally in the Estado Oriental equally threatened the Ribeiros’ claims to be able to dispense justice and protect the legal rights of their factional allies. Once again, the shock waves from a single legal reversal could radiate across the borderlands and produce renewed conflicts in a variety of strategic locations. With his honor in question across the border in the Estado Oriental, Bica had to work to restore his own personal prestige in Corrientes. Bica settled in the correntino department of Monte Caseros. The department was situated in Corrientes’ southern and eastern borderlands along the west bank of the Uruguay River. Here, both Mitre and Urquiza were engaged throughout the 1850s in a struggle to influence the local departmental commanders in their ongoing conflicts with the distant provincial government in the city of Corrientes. Urquiza quickly moved to establish a relationship with the exiled Brazilian rancher. The two men entered into a commercial partnership in 1855. Bica agreed to supply Urquiza’s vast saladero with cattle from his correntino ranch. Urquiza’s commercial ties to the Brazilian rancher also provided a political ally in his own struggles to control the correntino borderlands. The two men began forging a reciprocal relationship that could be deployed in the province’s intensifying political conflicts. 216 216 Macchi, Urquiza: el Saladerista, 31-32. 249
- Page 207 and 208: and the titles of each litigant in
- Page 209 and 210: judgment declaring their rival’s
- Page 211 and 212: CHAPTER 5 POLITICAL POWER AND PROPE
- Page 213 and 214: property of Joaquim dos Santos Prad
- Page 215 and 216: acknowledged by both court and poss
- Page 217 and 218: Paulo, Sá Brito was one of the few
- Page 219 and 220: Teixeira claimed that Prado Lima ha
- Page 221 and 222: the trial court’s judgment. The c
- Page 223 and 224: lands in question in 1833. The cour
- Page 225 and 226: The appearance of testimony by Prad
- Page 227 and 228: of cattle from the da Silva’s lan
- Page 229 and 230: [Lima] contracted with an untrained
- Page 231 and 232: that department, Colonel Diego Lama
- Page 233 and 234: vizinho” in Alegrete’s courts o
- Page 235 and 236: Brigadier Don David Canavarro . . .
- Page 237 and 238: assistance, Garces won her case aga
- Page 239 and 240: Brazil. Berro ended a decade of fre
- Page 241 and 242: coexistence of these provincial and
- Page 243 and 244: Urquiza’s efforts to placate his
- Page 245 and 246: and elites now supported Urquiza’
- Page 247 and 248: province within the national framew
- Page 249 and 250: porteño cavalry at Cepeda and Pav
- Page 251 and 252: The correntino merchants responded
- Page 253 and 254: assembling witnesses (in this case,
- Page 255 and 256: etween himself and Abendaño, howev
- Page 257: complete the exchange, however, Bic
- Page 261 and 262: Bica had used commercial and politi
- Page 263 and 264: The incident also revealed how impe
- Page 265 and 266: positioned the Ribeiro faction to g
- Page 267 and 268: Borderlands inhabitants in the earl
- Page 269 and 270: neatly encapsulated the ongoing con
- Page 271 and 272: for Brazilian ranchers. In the best
- Page 273 and 274: anchers operating throughout the bo
- Page 275 and 276: Brazilian slave laws followed them
- Page 277 and 278: familial connections on the Brazili
- Page 279 and 280: defined their respective places in
- Page 281 and 282: supply his troops. 26 By the time o
- Page 283 and 284: Brazilian masters that resulted in
- Page 285 and 286: pursue further rights. They would p
- Page 287 and 288: in the Estado Oriental. At the hear
- Page 289 and 290: was also a personal enemy of Canaba
- Page 291 and 292: part of a broader narrative of conf
- Page 293 and 294: anything, Orientales.” 56 Gomez
- Page 295 and 296: anchers, like that of local Uruguay
- Page 297 and 298: “complete proof of oriental natio
- Page 299 and 300: Uruguayan notaries. These included
- Page 301 and 302: Republic over issues of rivertine t
- Page 303 and 304: his cattle in 1858. 79 Recall also
- Page 305 and 306: of warfare in the borderlands furth
- Page 307 and 308: In effect, he hoped to exchange loy
ordered.” 211 Gándara complained that “there is no plausible reason for the delay.”<br />
Gándara’s alarm was well justified. With fraud allegations pending against him in front of a<br />
blanco judge, Bica appeared to be using his political connections with the juez de paz to flee.<br />
Gándara wrote to Real, stating that the juez de paz “had no interest in pursuing the Dispatch<br />
from this tribunal before [Bica’s] evasion to the neighboring province of Corrientes.” 212<br />
During the month-long delay, Bica in fact had shifted most of his fungible assets<br />
across the border into Corrientes and out of the Salto court’s jurisdiction. Still determined,<br />
Gándara traveled to Paysandú. He requested that the judge there embargo Bica’s remaining<br />
goods to cover his commercial debts. In Paysandú, Gándara again pointed to Bica’s<br />
reputation. He noted that “the respondent does not have well-known roots here” and “his<br />
notorious bad faith makes it likely he will abscond with additional goods.” 213 In short, Bica<br />
was an outsider: the opposite of an honorable vecino. He could not be trusted to respect the<br />
court’s jurisdiction, his creditors’ rights or his commercial obligations. The court in<br />
Paysandú issued a contempt order against Bica. Back in Salto, Real issued a similar demand<br />
against Bica and the juez de paz. 214 By then, Bica had crossed into to Corrientes.<br />
Bica had escaped, but at the cost of much of his property in the Estado Oriental.<br />
Gándara seized possession on behalf of several creditors of Bica’s substantial<br />
landholdings. 215 Bica’s commercial operations in the Estado Oriental were crippled. This<br />
posed a problem not only for his personal economic situation, but also for that of his<br />
factional and familial allies in Alegrete. Recall again that the Ribeiros were engaged in a<br />
prolonged battle with Canabarro over political control of the Brazilian borderlands. Each<br />
<br />
211 Ibid., 6bis.<br />
212 Ibid.<br />
213 Ibid., 8-8bis.<br />
214 Ibid., 10.<br />
215 Ibid.<br />
248 <br />