“MONSTROUS AND ILLEGAL PROCEEDINGS”: LAW ...
“MONSTROUS AND ILLEGAL PROCEEDINGS”: LAW ... “MONSTROUS AND ILLEGAL PROCEEDINGS”: LAW ...
worked to challenge their ability to provide justice for the correntino merchant. Lamas in particular used his power to prevent Tejo and Llupes from securing justice for their ally. Cristobo’s release became a tool to damage the personal, legal and commercial reputations of factional rivals on both sides of the river. In this sense, legal proceedings – and judicial outcomes – reflected the constant ebb and flow of personal power and prestige as political opponents maneuvered for position in even the most seemingly prosaic legal matters. Despite his failure to obtain justice in Salto, Gelabert continued to utilize his factional connections to pursue Cristobo. After several months of delays, Gelabert received word that Cristobo had traveled to Brazil. Gelabert contacted officials and quickly obtained Cristobo’s arrest in Uruguaiana. Triumphantly, Gelabert wrote about his ability to secure justice against his former apprentice: It seems that a substantial part of the Province [of Corrientes] knows well an event which honors me, the capture of the thief Gallego in Brazil; despite the infamous nature of three or four miserable types, more judges have appeared in my name and to their good credit and reason have blunted their infamous pretensions. 204 Through this statement, Gelabert explicitly recognized the vital role local networks of witnesses linked through factional political alliances stretching across the borderlands played in his quest for justice and personal honor. As he pursued Cristobo from forum to forum and navigated the shoals of local legal politics, Gelabert’s continued ability to locate and deploy “more judges” proved vital in undoing the damage that the factional struggles in Mercedes had caused to his commercial enterprise. Gelabert’s case again underlines the intensely localized, but also deeply integrated nature of borderlands legalities. His legal troubles stemmed from a disagreement with a judge in Mercedes in what appeared to be a relatively mundane criminal matter. The conflict 204 AGPC. Fondo Mantilla. Archivo Valdéz, v. 18, Miguel V. Gelabert al Sor. D. Gregorio Valdés (November 29, 1859). 244
etween himself and Abendaño, however, reflected the much larger clashes occurring throughout the Argentine provinces as Mitre and Urquiza sought to forge national coalitions. To defend his rights, Gelabert turned to his colorado allies in the Estado Oriental and to the merchant community in Alegrete. As they moved to assist him, they opened up further divisions between themselves and blanco officials. The various strands of local relationships and cross-border reciprocal ties converging in Gelabert’s case defined the region’s sovereign struggles. Within this framework, any dispute over property rights could become a battleground for political rivals to exploit in their drive to control the borderlands. Manuel Bica’s experience provides a good example. Bica came from a prominent family of Brazilian ranchers located around Rio Pardo, Brazil, in the central portion of Rio Grande do Sul province. His family later migrated to Alegrete and established a ranching operation there. With the outbreak of the Farrapos War in 1835, Bica joined the republican cause, serving until 1844. 205 Bica then married the daughter of Antonio José de Oliveira, a wealthy rancher in Alegrete. Another of Oliveira’s daughters married Antônio Mâncio Ribeiro, Bento Manoel Ribeiro’s son. Through his marriage, Bica forged social and political connections with the Ribeiro family and their factional allies throughout the Brazilian borderlands. Bica crossed the border into Uruguay sometime in the late 1840s. There, he developed a number of commercial and political connections with prominent members of the colorado faction. Like many Brazilians, Bica used these connections to obtain property. He purchased a ranch near the Brazilian border between Alegrete and Salto in the early 1850s. Bica also benefited from the 1851 Brazilian invasion of the Estado Oriental. 205 CV-3385 (March 21, 1844). 245
- Page 203 and 204: throughout the country that his wor
- Page 205 and 206: his wife. He claimed that she “wa
- Page 207 and 208: and the titles of each litigant in
- Page 209 and 210: judgment declaring their rival’s
- Page 211 and 212: CHAPTER 5 POLITICAL POWER AND PROPE
- Page 213 and 214: property of Joaquim dos Santos Prad
- Page 215 and 216: acknowledged by both court and poss
- Page 217 and 218: Paulo, Sá Brito was one of the few
- Page 219 and 220: Teixeira claimed that Prado Lima ha
- Page 221 and 222: the trial court’s judgment. The c
- Page 223 and 224: lands in question in 1833. The cour
- Page 225 and 226: The appearance of testimony by Prad
- Page 227 and 228: of cattle from the da Silva’s lan
- Page 229 and 230: [Lima] contracted with an untrained
- Page 231 and 232: that department, Colonel Diego Lama
- Page 233 and 234: vizinho” in Alegrete’s courts o
- Page 235 and 236: Brigadier Don David Canavarro . . .
- Page 237 and 238: assistance, Garces won her case aga
- Page 239 and 240: Brazil. Berro ended a decade of fre
- Page 241 and 242: coexistence of these provincial and
- Page 243 and 244: Urquiza’s efforts to placate his
- Page 245 and 246: and elites now supported Urquiza’
- Page 247 and 248: province within the national framew
- Page 249 and 250: porteño cavalry at Cepeda and Pav
- Page 251 and 252: The correntino merchants responded
- Page 253: assembling witnesses (in this case,
- Page 257 and 258: complete the exchange, however, Bic
- Page 259 and 260: side sought to dictate the distribu
- Page 261 and 262: Bica had used commercial and politi
- Page 263 and 264: The incident also revealed how impe
- Page 265 and 266: positioned the Ribeiro faction to g
- Page 267 and 268: Borderlands inhabitants in the earl
- Page 269 and 270: neatly encapsulated the ongoing con
- Page 271 and 272: for Brazilian ranchers. In the best
- Page 273 and 274: anchers operating throughout the bo
- Page 275 and 276: Brazilian slave laws followed them
- Page 277 and 278: familial connections on the Brazili
- Page 279 and 280: defined their respective places in
- Page 281 and 282: supply his troops. 26 By the time o
- Page 283 and 284: Brazilian masters that resulted in
- Page 285 and 286: pursue further rights. They would p
- Page 287 and 288: in the Estado Oriental. At the hear
- Page 289 and 290: was also a personal enemy of Canaba
- Page 291 and 292: part of a broader narrative of conf
- Page 293 and 294: anything, Orientales.” 56 Gomez
- Page 295 and 296: anchers, like that of local Uruguay
- Page 297 and 298: “complete proof of oriental natio
- Page 299 and 300: Uruguayan notaries. These included
- Page 301 and 302: Republic over issues of rivertine t
- Page 303 and 304: his cattle in 1858. 79 Recall also
worked to challenge their ability to provide justice for the correntino merchant. Lamas in<br />
particular used his power to prevent Tejo and Llupes from securing justice for their ally.<br />
Cristobo’s release became a tool to damage the personal, legal and commercial reputations of<br />
factional rivals on both sides of the river. In this sense, legal proceedings – and judicial<br />
outcomes – reflected the constant ebb and flow of personal power and prestige as political<br />
opponents maneuvered for position in even the most seemingly prosaic legal matters.<br />
Despite his failure to obtain justice in Salto, Gelabert continued to utilize his<br />
factional connections to pursue Cristobo. After several months of delays, Gelabert received<br />
word that Cristobo had traveled to Brazil. Gelabert contacted officials and quickly obtained<br />
Cristobo’s arrest in Uruguaiana. Triumphantly, Gelabert wrote about his ability to secure<br />
justice against his former apprentice:<br />
It seems that a substantial part of the Province [of Corrientes] knows well an event<br />
which honors me, the capture of the thief Gallego in Brazil; despite the infamous<br />
nature of three or four miserable types, more judges have appeared in my name and<br />
to their good credit and reason have blunted their infamous pretensions. 204<br />
Through this statement, Gelabert explicitly recognized the vital role local networks of<br />
witnesses linked through factional political alliances stretching across the borderlands played<br />
in his quest for justice and personal honor. As he pursued Cristobo from forum to forum<br />
and navigated the shoals of local legal politics, Gelabert’s continued ability to locate and<br />
deploy “more judges” proved vital in undoing the damage that the factional struggles in<br />
Mercedes had caused to his commercial enterprise.<br />
Gelabert’s case again underlines the intensely localized, but also deeply integrated<br />
nature of borderlands legalities. His legal troubles stemmed from a disagreement with a<br />
judge in Mercedes in what appeared to be a relatively mundane criminal matter. The conflict<br />
<br />
204 AGPC. Fondo Mantilla. Archivo Valdéz, v. 18, Miguel V. Gelabert al Sor. D. Gregorio<br />
Valdés (November 29, 1859).<br />
244 <br />