“MONSTROUS AND ILLEGAL PROCEEDINGS”: LAW ...

“MONSTROUS AND ILLEGAL PROCEEDINGS”: LAW ... “MONSTROUS AND ILLEGAL PROCEEDINGS”: LAW ...

dataspace.princeton.edu
from dataspace.princeton.edu More from this publisher
28.06.2013 Views

worked to challenge their ability to provide justice for the correntino merchant. Lamas in particular used his power to prevent Tejo and Llupes from securing justice for their ally. Cristobo’s release became a tool to damage the personal, legal and commercial reputations of factional rivals on both sides of the river. In this sense, legal proceedings – and judicial outcomes – reflected the constant ebb and flow of personal power and prestige as political opponents maneuvered for position in even the most seemingly prosaic legal matters. Despite his failure to obtain justice in Salto, Gelabert continued to utilize his factional connections to pursue Cristobo. After several months of delays, Gelabert received word that Cristobo had traveled to Brazil. Gelabert contacted officials and quickly obtained Cristobo’s arrest in Uruguaiana. Triumphantly, Gelabert wrote about his ability to secure justice against his former apprentice: It seems that a substantial part of the Province [of Corrientes] knows well an event which honors me, the capture of the thief Gallego in Brazil; despite the infamous nature of three or four miserable types, more judges have appeared in my name and to their good credit and reason have blunted their infamous pretensions. 204 Through this statement, Gelabert explicitly recognized the vital role local networks of witnesses linked through factional political alliances stretching across the borderlands played in his quest for justice and personal honor. As he pursued Cristobo from forum to forum and navigated the shoals of local legal politics, Gelabert’s continued ability to locate and deploy “more judges” proved vital in undoing the damage that the factional struggles in Mercedes had caused to his commercial enterprise. Gelabert’s case again underlines the intensely localized, but also deeply integrated nature of borderlands legalities. His legal troubles stemmed from a disagreement with a judge in Mercedes in what appeared to be a relatively mundane criminal matter. The conflict 























































 204 AGPC. Fondo Mantilla. Archivo Valdéz, v. 18, Miguel V. Gelabert al Sor. D. Gregorio Valdés (November 29, 1859). 
 244
 


etween himself and Abendaño, however, reflected the much larger clashes occurring throughout the Argentine provinces as Mitre and Urquiza sought to forge national coalitions. To defend his rights, Gelabert turned to his colorado allies in the Estado Oriental and to the merchant community in Alegrete. As they moved to assist him, they opened up further divisions between themselves and blanco officials. The various strands of local relationships and cross-border reciprocal ties converging in Gelabert’s case defined the region’s sovereign struggles. Within this framework, any dispute over property rights could become a battleground for political rivals to exploit in their drive to control the borderlands. Manuel Bica’s experience provides a good example. Bica came from a prominent family of Brazilian ranchers located around Rio Pardo, Brazil, in the central portion of Rio Grande do Sul province. His family later migrated to Alegrete and established a ranching operation there. With the outbreak of the Farrapos War in 1835, Bica joined the republican cause, serving until 1844. 205 Bica then married the daughter of Antonio José de Oliveira, a wealthy rancher in Alegrete. Another of Oliveira’s daughters married Antônio Mâncio Ribeiro, Bento Manoel Ribeiro’s son. Through his marriage, Bica forged social and political connections with the Ribeiro family and their factional allies throughout the Brazilian borderlands. Bica crossed the border into Uruguay sometime in the late 1840s. There, he developed a number of commercial and political connections with prominent members of the colorado faction. Like many Brazilians, Bica used these connections to obtain property. He purchased a ranch near the Brazilian border between Alegrete and Salto in the early 1850s. Bica also benefited from the 1851 Brazilian invasion of the Estado Oriental. 























































 205 CV-3385 (March 21, 1844). 
 245
 


worked to challenge their ability to provide justice for the correntino merchant. Lamas in<br />

particular used his power to prevent Tejo and Llupes from securing justice for their ally.<br />

Cristobo’s release became a tool to damage the personal, legal and commercial reputations of<br />

factional rivals on both sides of the river. In this sense, legal proceedings – and judicial<br />

outcomes – reflected the constant ebb and flow of personal power and prestige as political<br />

opponents maneuvered for position in even the most seemingly prosaic legal matters.<br />

Despite his failure to obtain justice in Salto, Gelabert continued to utilize his<br />

factional connections to pursue Cristobo. After several months of delays, Gelabert received<br />

word that Cristobo had traveled to Brazil. Gelabert contacted officials and quickly obtained<br />

Cristobo’s arrest in Uruguaiana. Triumphantly, Gelabert wrote about his ability to secure<br />

justice against his former apprentice:<br />

It seems that a substantial part of the Province [of Corrientes] knows well an event<br />

which honors me, the capture of the thief Gallego in Brazil; despite the infamous<br />

nature of three or four miserable types, more judges have appeared in my name and<br />

to their good credit and reason have blunted their infamous pretensions. 204<br />

Through this statement, Gelabert explicitly recognized the vital role local networks of<br />

witnesses linked through factional political alliances stretching across the borderlands played<br />

in his quest for justice and personal honor. As he pursued Cristobo from forum to forum<br />

and navigated the shoals of local legal politics, Gelabert’s continued ability to locate and<br />

deploy “more judges” proved vital in undoing the damage that the factional struggles in<br />

Mercedes had caused to his commercial enterprise.<br />

Gelabert’s case again underlines the intensely localized, but also deeply integrated<br />

nature of borderlands legalities. His legal troubles stemmed from a disagreement with a<br />

judge in Mercedes in what appeared to be a relatively mundane criminal matter. The conflict<br />

























































<br />

204 AGPC. Fondo Mantilla. Archivo Valdéz, v. 18, Miguel V. Gelabert al Sor. D. Gregorio<br />

Valdés (November 29, 1859).<br />


 244
<br />

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!