28.06.2013 Views

“MONSTROUS AND ILLEGAL PROCEEDINGS”: LAW ...

“MONSTROUS AND ILLEGAL PROCEEDINGS”: LAW ...

“MONSTROUS AND ILLEGAL PROCEEDINGS”: LAW ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Converging Conflicts<br />

By the early 1860s, the various sovereign conflicts percolating around the Río de la<br />

Plata began to converge with the endemic local clashes over personal reputations and private<br />

law rights. Within the system of borderlands legalities, establishing authority meant entering<br />

into the dense webs of local and cross-border relationships. As we saw in the previous<br />

sections, these connections were necessary not only secure legal rights, but also played an<br />

important role in forging the basis for broader provincial and national projects. The struggle<br />

to control local legal relationships and cross-border reciprocal connections began to set the<br />

stage for much broader conflicts in the northern Uruguayan borderlands.<br />

Like their Brazilian and Uruguayan counterparts, merchants and landowners in the<br />

Argentine Littoral were tightly linked to both local allies and trading partners across the<br />

borderlands. Mitre and Urquiza repeatedly clashed in Corrientes in particular as they jostled<br />

to establish local allegiances. They engendered not only localized disputes, but also conflicts<br />

along integrated chains of reciprocal connections. Consider the example of Miguel Gelabert.<br />

Gelabert was a merchant based in the correntino borderlands around the town of Mercedes.<br />

In 1857, Gelabert and his commercial partner, Pedro Madariaga, discovered some two<br />

ounces of gold had been stolen from a safe in their offices. The juez de crimen in Mercedes,<br />

Miguel Abendaño, was slow to respond. Abendaño requested that the merchants wait until<br />

additional officials arrived to conduct the investigation. After some six days, the men<br />

complained about the judge’s inaction in the matter. Abendaño then publicly accused<br />

Gelabert and Madariaga “of being the thieves of [their] own Capital.” 195 The judge publicly<br />

threatened to arrest the men if they continued to pursue the matter.<br />

























































<br />

195 AGPC. Fondo Mantilla. Archivo Valdéz, v. 18, Pedro Madariaga y Miguel Victorin<br />

Gelabert al Sor. D. Gregorio Valdés (January 24, 1857).<br />


 240
<br />

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!