28.06.2013 Views

“MONSTROUS AND ILLEGAL PROCEEDINGS”: LAW ...

“MONSTROUS AND ILLEGAL PROCEEDINGS”: LAW ...

“MONSTROUS AND ILLEGAL PROCEEDINGS”: LAW ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Brigadier Don David Canavarro . . . that he has then recognized based solely on the simple<br />

word of his compatriots.” 165 Azambuya noted that his own actions against many of the<br />

Brazilian landowners “had been affected in response to orders authorized and sent by the<br />

superior tribunals in [Montevideo].” He labored only to follow “judicial orders” and ensure<br />

“public order” in the countryside. Canabarro’s repeated interventions threatened the<br />

“degeneration of justice on the part of the courts” in the Republic. 166<br />

Blanco officials were equally alarmed by the potential for these interventions to<br />

produce violent factional clashes between themselves and their colorado rivals. The dispute<br />

between Manuel Vicente Ylla and Bernardino Alves Nogueira Jubim offers a good example<br />

of how Canabarro’s efforts to secure property for his allies across the border produced<br />

spasms of violence throughout the Uruguayan borderlands. The initial conflict began in<br />

1857 when Jubim took title to a tract of land located near the Brazilian border around<br />

Santana do Livramento. Jubim originally received the land from Manuel Ferreira Bica. Bica<br />

was one of Jubim’s commercial partners. 167 Bica in turn possessed close personal and<br />

commercial ties not only to the Ribeiros, but prominent members of the colorado faction in<br />

and around Salto. Bica and Canabarro also harbored deep personal animosities against one<br />

another dating to the Farrapos War when Bica effectively refused to serve under Canabarro’s<br />

command. 168<br />

























































<br />

165<br />

Uruguay, Documentos Oficiales, 33-34.<br />

166<br />

Ibid.<br />

167<br />

AGPC. Fondo Mantilla. Archivo Valdéz, v. 18, Antonio Luis al Joaquin Madariaga<br />

(October 14, 1847); Testimonio del Testamento de D. Manuel Fereira Bica, AGN-SJ. Salto.<br />

Letrados Civil, No. 11 (1876), 8bis.<br />

168<br />

In 1844, Canabarro stopped just short of accusing Bica of treason when he requested<br />

a discharge from the army as a result of his ill-health. Canabarro wrote that he had “to<br />

observe that those officials seeking a discharge during the current crisis lack the patriotism<br />

necessary to animate them, such as Tenente Manuel Ferreira Bica, a boy, with illnesses, that<br />

could continue to serve.” CV-3385 (March 23, 1844).<br />


 225
<br />

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!