28.06.2013 Views

“MONSTROUS AND ILLEGAL PROCEEDINGS”: LAW ...

“MONSTROUS AND ILLEGAL PROCEEDINGS”: LAW ...

“MONSTROUS AND ILLEGAL PROCEEDINGS”: LAW ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

the trial court’s judgment. The considerable expenses required to bring the case all the way<br />

to the high court reflected how serious Teixeira and the Ribeiro faction were in depriving a<br />

powerful enemy of his economic resources. However, Prado Lima continued to possess<br />

sufficient political and social connections to ward off their claims. Nevertheless, he and his<br />

political allies were now on the defensive.<br />

The breakthrough against Prado Lima came in 1860 with the temporary dismissal of<br />

David Canabarro from his military command. With Canabarro’s ability to influence events<br />

reduced, the stage was set for Teixeira to again challenge Prado Lima’s property claims in a<br />

new proceeding in 1861. 132 In this second case, Teixeira brought a suit against Prado Lima<br />

on behalf of Joaquim Leão. Leão’s complaint alleged that he had originally purchased lands<br />

now occupied by Prado Lima from Antonio Ferreira da Cunha in 1833. Leão (through<br />

Teixeira) claimed that he had owned and occupied the land without incident until 1838. He<br />

testified, however, that “during this Province’s revolution he was violently dispossessed [of<br />

his property] by means of armed force, his land and cattle seized by Joaquim dos Santos<br />

Prado Lima, then Chief of Police in the revolutionary government.” 133 Faced with threats of<br />

violence and having already lost 3,000 head of cattle, Leão left the area. Echoing Lisboa’s<br />

earlier claims, Leão argued that it was only now, nearly twenty-five years after Prado Lima<br />

originally ejected him from his land, that he could seek restitution for his losses.<br />

Prado Lima offered a dramatically different interpretation of events in his response.<br />

He alleged that Ferreira had taken advantage of the turmoil caused by José Artigas’ invasions<br />

in 1815 to occupy the lands in question illegally. Although military authorities had ordered<br />

Ferreira off the property on several occasions, Ferreira had again exploited the disorder<br />

























































<br />

132 Joaquim Marchado Leão c. Joaquim Dos Santos Prado Lima.<br />

133 Ibid., 2.<br />


 211
<br />

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!