28.06.2013 Views

“MONSTROUS AND ILLEGAL PROCEEDINGS”: LAW ...

“MONSTROUS AND ILLEGAL PROCEEDINGS”: LAW ...

“MONSTROUS AND ILLEGAL PROCEEDINGS”: LAW ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

the reputation of representatives and their ability to use it to gain access to justice at each<br />

local link along commercial chains.


<br />

Because local reputation played such a critical role in obtaining justice and<br />

maintaining borderlands commercial relationships, cases involving assaults on personal<br />

honor constituted a central front in factional legal politics in the town. A review of some 23<br />

juicios de imprenta from the Salto courts reveals how factions challenged the reputation of their<br />

enemies while working to protect the status of their own allies through these types of judicial<br />

proceedings. These reputational battles intertwined with conflicts over the distribution of<br />

private law rights. In particular, as local officials sought to delineate property rights and<br />

offer protection for commercial transactions to bolster their local support, their rivals<br />

brought their reputations into question. In doing so, they laid the basis for challenging the<br />

legitimacy of legal claims altogether. They equally created renewed possibilities for factional<br />

conflicts around borderlands courtrooms.<br />

Juicios de imprenta, which involved in one commentator’s words “abuses of the<br />

freedom of the press,” were uniquely public proceedings. 76 Within this general rubric, juicios<br />

de imprenta covered an expansive range of topics, including general defamation of character,<br />

injury through “offensive allusions to honor or reputation” and publishing false criminal<br />

allegations against another. To bring charges, an aggrieved litigant petitioned the alcalde<br />

ordinario, presenting complete copies of the offending publication. The alcalde ordinario then<br />

was required by law to summon both litigants to a “public place” in order to select a jury to<br />

hear the initial proceeding. The alcalde received a list of seventy names of “citizens” over the<br />

age of twenty-five to hear the matter. He then selected seven names at random in front of<br />

























































<br />

76 Adolfo Rodriguez, El Digesto Nacional: Compendio de las Leyes, Decretos del Gobierno y<br />

Demas Resoluciones y Actos Oficiales de la República Oriental del Uruguay (Montevideo:<br />

Establecimiento Tipográfico y Litográfico de Luciano Mege, 1860), 164-65.<br />


 184
<br />

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!