“MONSTROUS AND ILLEGAL PROCEEDINGS”: LAW ...
“MONSTROUS AND ILLEGAL PROCEEDINGS”: LAW ... “MONSTROUS AND ILLEGAL PROCEEDINGS”: LAW ...
a district judge in Alegrete in 1865 signaled his and the Liberals’ definitive triumph over the Ribeiros and the progressistas in Alegrete. 74 Canabarro and his party of new, ideologically focused Liberals would dominate Rio Grande do Sul’s politics for the next two decades until the collapse of the empire in 1889. The increasing assertiveness of the borderlands Brazilian Liberals did not escape the notice of the imperial government. With the decade-long Farrapos Rebellion still a recent memory, imperial officials had good reason to believe that growing tensions in the borderlands could produce renewed civil war. At the same time, the complaints of prominent borderland ranchers and committed Liberals like Antonio Souza Netto about persistent violations of Brazilian property rights in the borderlands, particularly at the hands of coercive blanco officials in the Estado Oriental, flowed across the desks of bureaucrats in Porto Alegre and Rio de Janeiro. In connection with Netto’s claims, a newspaper from Rio Grande do Sul declared: “if nationality does not suffice so that our compatriots’ interests are respected, it is worth nothing.” 75 Imperial officials now found it necessary to again focus their attention on conflicts around property rights and across national boundaries along its southern borders. Over the course of the 1850s, Alegrete experienced nearly constant factional fighting to control the administration of justice in the town. The intensity of these struggles reflected the nature of borderlands legalities and their vital importance to defining one’s social standing and personal power in a tumultuous world. Judicial officials like Teixeira and Amaral, as well as military officers and landowners like the Ribeiros and Canabarro spent substantial resources to control the courts and to secure success in litigation because it 74 CV-3454 (February 15, 1865). 75 Barrán, Apogeo y Crisis, 84. 182
mattered greatly to their own power. Through these conflicts, they also sharpened factional allegiances. Ultimately, law and violence in the Brazilian borderlands proved too deeply entangled to permit the formation of elite coalitions to end political struggles. State leaders would have to solve the problem of order in the borderlands by working within these factional conflicts over law, not by trying to suppress them. The Factional Theater of Salto, Uruguay Leaders like Berro and Lamas had hoped to resolve the persistent problems of order in the borderlands through the creation of national identities and the extension of respect for the law. In doing so, they equally aimed to extend the authority of coastal elites over the borderlands and tame the factional divisions that threatened the Uruguayan Republic’s sovereignty. However, as we saw in Alegrete, struggles over borderlands courts meant that instead of fostering national identities, legal politics engendered ever-sharpening factional divisions. Fusionist efforts to suppress political rivalries in the borderlands faltered as they encountered alternative legalities premised on local control of the courthouse. The persistent clashes to control borderlands legalities reflected the deeply entangled nature of law and violence in local fora and the difficulties states would face to control both. In Salto, these fault lines proved particularly pronounced over questions of personal reputations. Much like Alegrete, Salto was extremely prosperous in the 1850s. The port city took advantage of its strategic location at a portage point around the Uruguay River’s twin falls (thus, the town’s name “salto” or falls) to control much of the region’s rivertine trade at mid-century. In addition, Salto’s jurisdiction extended across the entire northern portion of the Estado Oriental, encompassing the rich pastures that formed the heart of the borderland’s ranching economy. The booming trade on both sides of the Uruguayan and Brazilian border produced numerous economic and political alliances whose lifeblood was 183
- Page 141 and 142: Fernandes Braga, the provincial pre
- Page 143 and 144: Frustrated by the lack of progress,
- Page 145 and 146: cataloguing illegal property confis
- Page 147 and 148: also provided prominent local elite
- Page 149 and 150: As the 1850s dawned, the persistent
- Page 151 and 152: traffic along the Uruguay. Rosas fi
- Page 153 and 154: would order, they intend to be resp
- Page 155 and 156: economic and political relationship
- Page 157 and 158: fed back into broader political dis
- Page 159 and 160: advance their visions for a new nat
- Page 161 and 162: Estado Oriental and had fought at C
- Page 163 and 164: Brazilian officials opened secret n
- Page 165 and 166: The 1855 occupation reinvigorated e
- Page 167 and 168: end political violence in the inter
- Page 169 and 170: important) but also dealt with defi
- Page 171 and 172: Ribeiros, Prado Lima possessed land
- Page 173 and 174: move to Alegrete were unclear. Duri
- Page 175 and 176: verification of filings in his foru
- Page 177 and 178: “intimate friend and relative.”
- Page 179 and 180: men. They were capable of protectin
- Page 181 and 182: Nolasco and Vianna responded that t
- Page 183 and 184: in 1834. Joaquim dos Santos Prado L
- Page 185 and 186: Vital de Oliveira, securing his ele
- Page 187 and 188: controlled the appointment of distr
- Page 189 and 190: military control. By engaging in th
- Page 191: faction’s strength. In particular
- Page 195 and 196: the parties and the public, with ea
- Page 197 and 198: matter, he was an outsider. Tristan
- Page 199 and 200: Tristani then attempted to attack h
- Page 201 and 202: litigation in Alegrete, questions o
- Page 203 and 204: throughout the country that his wor
- Page 205 and 206: his wife. He claimed that she “wa
- Page 207 and 208: and the titles of each litigant in
- Page 209 and 210: judgment declaring their rival’s
- Page 211 and 212: CHAPTER 5 POLITICAL POWER AND PROPE
- Page 213 and 214: property of Joaquim dos Santos Prad
- Page 215 and 216: acknowledged by both court and poss
- Page 217 and 218: Paulo, Sá Brito was one of the few
- Page 219 and 220: Teixeira claimed that Prado Lima ha
- Page 221 and 222: the trial court’s judgment. The c
- Page 223 and 224: lands in question in 1833. The cour
- Page 225 and 226: The appearance of testimony by Prad
- Page 227 and 228: of cattle from the da Silva’s lan
- Page 229 and 230: [Lima] contracted with an untrained
- Page 231 and 232: that department, Colonel Diego Lama
- Page 233 and 234: vizinho” in Alegrete’s courts o
- Page 235 and 236: Brigadier Don David Canavarro . . .
- Page 237 and 238: assistance, Garces won her case aga
- Page 239 and 240: Brazil. Berro ended a decade of fre
- Page 241 and 242: coexistence of these provincial and
a district judge in Alegrete in 1865 signaled his and the Liberals’ definitive triumph over the<br />
Ribeiros and the progressistas in Alegrete. 74 Canabarro and his party of new, ideologically<br />
focused Liberals would dominate Rio Grande do Sul’s politics for the next two decades until<br />
the collapse of the empire in 1889.<br />
The increasing assertiveness of the borderlands Brazilian Liberals did not escape the<br />
notice of the imperial government. With the decade-long Farrapos Rebellion still a recent<br />
memory, imperial officials had good reason to believe that growing tensions in the<br />
borderlands could produce renewed civil war. At the same time, the complaints of<br />
prominent borderland ranchers and committed Liberals like Antonio Souza Netto about<br />
persistent violations of Brazilian property rights in the borderlands, particularly at the hands<br />
of coercive blanco officials in the Estado Oriental, flowed across the desks of bureaucrats in<br />
Porto Alegre and Rio de Janeiro. In connection with Netto’s claims, a newspaper from Rio<br />
Grande do Sul declared: “if nationality does not suffice so that our compatriots’ interests are<br />
respected, it is worth nothing.” 75 Imperial officials now found it necessary to again focus<br />
their attention on conflicts around property rights and across national boundaries along its<br />
southern borders.<br />
Over the course of the 1850s, Alegrete experienced nearly constant factional fighting<br />
to control the administration of justice in the town. The intensity of these struggles reflected<br />
the nature of borderlands legalities and their vital importance to defining one’s social<br />
standing and personal power in a tumultuous world. Judicial officials like Teixeira and<br />
Amaral, as well as military officers and landowners like the Ribeiros and Canabarro spent<br />
substantial resources to control the courts and to secure success in litigation because it<br />
<br />
74 CV-3454 (February 15, 1865).<br />
75 Barrán, Apogeo y Crisis, 84.<br />
182 <br />