28.06.2013 Views

“MONSTROUS AND ILLEGAL PROCEEDINGS”: LAW ...

“MONSTROUS AND ILLEGAL PROCEEDINGS”: LAW ...

“MONSTROUS AND ILLEGAL PROCEEDINGS”: LAW ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

fed back into broader political disputes. In particular, the very centrality of the law to<br />

defining factional power, personal reputations and reciprocal ties led to increasingly sharp<br />

local struggles. These clashes in turn radiated through the networks of commercial and<br />

political associations stitching the tightly integrated borderlands together. As the 1850s<br />

progressed, therefore, the loose coalitions of elites envisioned by reformers progressively<br />

ceded ground to more sharply defined factional assemblages. These entities centered on<br />

powerful figures like David Canabarro, among others, who organized allies to control<br />

courtrooms throughout the borderlands. The peripheral solutions to the problem of order<br />

in the previous decades now began to lay the foundation for new rounds of sovereign<br />

conflicts.<br />

This chapter explores how borderlands legalities produced increased political<br />

tensions and factional rivalries. It does so by dropping down to the local level and looking at<br />

the relationship between litigation and sharpening factional disputes over the course of the<br />

1850s. It maps the conflicts in and around courthouses in two strategic fora in the Brazilian<br />

and Uruguayan borderlands. The first, Alegrete, Brazil, witnessed a decade-long conflict to<br />

control the administration of justice in the town. These factional clashes involved legal<br />

proceedings, elections and pervasive violence. This chapter examines how the prolonged<br />

struggle to control Alegrete’s courthouse propelled the creation of much more sharply<br />

defined political coalitions. The second section explores renewed conflicts between the old<br />

blanco and colorado parties in Salto, Uruguay around issues of personal reputation and political<br />

power. Here, litigation over juicios de imprenta, a particularly public proceeding held in the<br />

town’s theater, provided much of the impetus for local struggles to control borderlands<br />

legalities. In each forum, litigation remained a critical moment in which local rivals could<br />

publicly express their commercial and political associations and define their place within the<br />


 147
<br />

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!