28.06.2013 Views

“MONSTROUS AND ILLEGAL PROCEEDINGS”: LAW ...

“MONSTROUS AND ILLEGAL PROCEEDINGS”: LAW ...

“MONSTROUS AND ILLEGAL PROCEEDINGS”: LAW ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

also provided prominent local elites with a mechanism to enhance their own personal<br />

standing as guarantors of cross-border economic relationships. 29<br />

Once again, borderlands courtrooms represented important arenas in which to<br />

articulate reciprocal ties. Litigation also provided a means to bolster the personal reputations<br />

of local leaders vying to protect Brazilian property rights across the border. The criminal<br />

charges against Hypolito Firio Cardoso and Cándido Figuero for allegedly organizing an<br />

incursion of over three hundred Brazilians into Uruguay in 1847 provide a good example. 30<br />

The proceeding began with a complaint from Diego Lamas, Oribe’s blanco lieutenant. Lamas<br />

drafted a letter to Brazilian officials demanding justice for several incursions organized by<br />

Cardoso and Figuero to remove cattle from across the border. Lamas noted that “a<br />

considerable number of vizinhos of this frontier had cooperated for this end.” 31 Figuero’s<br />

inclusion is particularly interesting because he possessed commercial relationships dating<br />

back to the Farrapos Rebellion with Agustín Guarch and other colorado merchants across the<br />

border. 32 His alleged participation in the raids again suggests that cross-border reciprocal<br />

relationships were at work in driving the californias.<br />

Faced with Lamas’ claims, Brazilian officials filed criminal charges against the two<br />

commanders for violating the empire’s stated policy of strict neutrality in Uruguayan affairs.<br />

The nature of the trial, however, suggests that officials in Alegrete were less interested in<br />

defending Uruguayan sovereignty than in publicly manifesting Cardoso’s and Figuero’s legal<br />

protection of Brazilian property. To that end, Cardoso and Figuero appeared in the Alegrete<br />

courts in a public jury trial. Selected exclusively from property owners, the jury embodied<br />

























































<br />

29 Ibid.<br />

30 Justiça c. Hypolito Firio Cardoso e Cándido Figuero, APRGS. Alegrete. Cartório Civil e<br />

Crime. Processos Crimes. Maço 77 No. 2669 (1847).<br />

31 Ibid., 10<br />

32 CV-4434 (February 18, 1841).<br />


 137
<br />

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!