28.06.2013 Views

“MONSTROUS AND ILLEGAL PROCEEDINGS”: LAW ...

“MONSTROUS AND ILLEGAL PROCEEDINGS”: LAW ...

“MONSTROUS AND ILLEGAL PROCEEDINGS”: LAW ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

funds, the imperial government took steps in both 1830 and 1831 to assert fiscal control<br />

over its southern border with the Uruguayan Republic. The government established tariff<br />

controls at key points such as Alegrete, Bagé and São Borja in order to collect taxes on cattle<br />

bound for the neighboring republic. Even more onerous, they imposed a 15% tax on cattle<br />

imported from Uruguay. This final measure enraged a borderlands ranching community that<br />

increasingly relied on pasturing herds across the border. 14<br />

Efforts to enforce the measures frequently met with armed resistance. Local judicial<br />

officials simply turned a blind eye to incidents between tax collectors and borderlands<br />

ranchers. These low level skirmishes between elites in the campanha and imperial officials laid<br />

bare the sharply divergent conceptions of the borderlands space that each side possessed.<br />

For the ranchers in Rio Grande do Sul, the borderlands were an economically integrated<br />

region. Their reciprocal trading chains stretched across multiple boundaries, linking various<br />

nodes of prominent local vecinos together. For imperial elites in Rio de Janeiro, the<br />

borderlands trade was something else entirely – contraband. Cross-border commerce was<br />

something to be taxed and controlled. These fundamentally distinct sovereign definitions<br />

remained unresolved throughout the 1830s. The borderlands again seethed. 15<br />

Political tensions across the border in Uruguay finally lit this riograndense powder keg.<br />

In particular, as ranchers on both sides of the border forged relationships to facilitate their<br />

cross-border trading operations and advance their political ambitions, conflicts between<br />

them destabilized the borderlands. Much like Tavarez, Bento Gonçalves da Silva maintained<br />

























































<br />

14 Leitman, Raízes, 133-36.<br />

15 Mariana Flores da Cunha Thompson Flores, "Contrabano e Contrabandistas na<br />

Fronteira Oeste do Rio Grande do Sul (1851-1864)" (M.A., Universidade Federal de Rio<br />

Grande do Sul, 2007). Flores frames these disputes over the meaning of contraband in<br />

terms of a “dynamic frontier” that simultaneously captures ideas of borderlands porosity and<br />

interconnectedness, as well as the national boundaries drawn across them.<br />


 127
<br />

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!