28.06.2013 Views

“MONSTROUS AND ILLEGAL PROCEEDINGS”: LAW ...

“MONSTROUS AND ILLEGAL PROCEEDINGS”: LAW ...

“MONSTROUS AND ILLEGAL PROCEEDINGS”: LAW ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

orderland legalities around vecindad. Traders and other elite borderlands residents on the<br />

move for economic and political reasons had to overcome suspicions accorded outsiders by<br />

developing a variety of strategies to ensure continued access to the localized justice. They<br />

did so by emphasizing elements of personal prestige and reciprocity that were articulated<br />

through factional political alliances. By stressing their social position and their connections<br />

to other men of honor in a given forum, merchants and landowners in the periphery could<br />

retain the flexibility of localized justice and autonomy while restricting its more radical<br />

implications. The testimony of honorable vecinos conferred local standing to outsiders – the<br />

same social status that facilitated the creation of borderlands trading relationships.<br />

The eyewitness testimony of “honorable vecinos” provided the critical evidentiary<br />

underpinnings for a number of legal rights, even trumping contrary written evidence on<br />

occasion. One example of the role of vecino testimony in general and of the personal<br />

character of the vecinos in particular played in supporting legal claims comes from the 1837<br />

land dispute between Petrona Perez and Maria Zabala de Hornos in Concepción del<br />

Uruguay. 102 The case boiled down to a disagreement over land boundaries stemming from<br />

the probate of Perez’s husband’s estate. Perez claimed that Hornos had illegally surveyed<br />

and then occupied a portion of her property. Perez faced two obstacles in pursuing her<br />

claim. First, she lacked a definitive legal title to occupy the tract. Second, Hornos possessed<br />

a survey from 1826 that supported her rights to the disputed lands.<br />

Confronted with this written evidence, however, Perez offered testimony from eight<br />

vecinos in the town. She noted: “It is not possible to present information in a character more<br />

serious, more legal and more orderly: it is before a competent Judge; it is rooted in the<br />

























































<br />

102 Petrona Perez, viuda de D. Pantaleon Panelo, reclamando de Doña Maria Zabala de Hornos la<br />

devolución de una fracción de campo de propiedad de la testamentaria de su esposo que ocupa idebidamente,<br />

AGPER. Hacienda. Serie IX, Subserie E, Civiles s/n (1837).<br />


 114
<br />

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!