28.06.2013 Views

“MONSTROUS AND ILLEGAL PROCEEDINGS”: LAW ...

“MONSTROUS AND ILLEGAL PROCEEDINGS”: LAW ...

“MONSTROUS AND ILLEGAL PROCEEDINGS”: LAW ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

INTRODUCTION<br />

IN EARLY 1828, A FRENCH MERCHANT NAMED JUAN MANUEL FERRER APPEARED<br />

before the courts in Montevideo requesting that the assets of his partner, Pedro Francisco<br />

Berro, be seized. Around the tribunal, war raged over the fate of the Banda Oriental,<br />

roughly the present-day nation of Uruguay. The Banda was a former Spanish frontier<br />

province and at that moment part of the Brazilian empire. When Ferrer brought his case,<br />

however, Brazilian control did not extend beyond Montevideo’s walls. Outside of the<br />

capital, Uruguayan rebels and their allies from the Argentine Confederation held control<br />

over most of the countryside. With them was Pedro Berro. Upon learning that Ferrer<br />

intended to seize two properties located on the other side of the front, Berro drafted a letter<br />

to the court claiming that Ferrer, “a foreigner,” who had “only by chance found himself<br />

under the guarantees of the Imperial Government,” was seeking to force him to “appear<br />

before authorities that do not pertain to me.” 1 Ferrer responded that “regardless of the state<br />

of war between the empire and the Argentine Republic, I would have submitted my claim<br />

before this same tribunal and issued summons to the Justices of said Republic so that they<br />

would compel the appearance of Argentine Citizen Don Pedro Francisco Berro” in<br />

Montevideo. Ferrer further contended that the war made filing the case in Montevideo even<br />

more appropriate. He argued that because of the siege, it was as if Berro had “become a<br />

vassal of the Great Sultan and had established his domicile in Constantinople.” It would be<br />

foolish to require him to chase “the goods that the new Muslim vassal [Berro]” had left<br />

behind in Montevideo throughout the rebellious countryside. Ferrer could only hope to<br />

























































<br />

1 D. Juan Manuel Ferrer c. D. Pedro Francisco Berro, AGN-SJ. Montevideo. Civil: 1º Turno,<br />

F-6 (1828), 28-28bis. For a full list of the archives consulted and the abbreviations used for<br />

them throughout the footnotes in this dissertation, please see the bibliography.<br />

1
<br />

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!