Annexure II - AERA
Annexure II - AERA
Annexure II - AERA
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
a. Land LeaseAgreement<br />
As per Clause 3.1 (a) of the Land Lease Agreement dated 30th<br />
September,2003, the land is permitted to be used for the purpose of<br />
construction of Airport as per the provisions of the Concession Agreement<br />
i.e. Project as defined therein.<br />
As per Clause 3.1 (b) the land also has been permitted to use for other<br />
commercial purposes including but not limited to the following:<br />
"hotels, resorts, flight catering, air craft maintenance, cargo and logistics<br />
centre, convention centre, golf courses, recreation and entertainment<br />
facilities, industrial facilities, fuel farms, terminalling facilities, power plants,<br />
storage and processing terminals, water treatment facilities, commercial<br />
and residential complexes and to undertake any other lawful commercial<br />
activity at the Airport. <strong>II</strong><br />
Thus it is clear that the purpose of land lease is twofold i.e. for (a) Airport<br />
and (b) Non-Airport activities.<br />
Hence, as per the provisions of the <strong>AERA</strong> Act, the Regulator is authorised to<br />
determine charges pertaining to the aeronautical charges at the Airport and<br />
as such the Regulator has no jurisdiction over the Non-Airport activities.<br />
b. GoAP position on land<br />
<strong>Annexure</strong> <strong>II</strong>-B<br />
We understand that the Govt. of AP has written to <strong>AERA</strong> clarifying its<br />
position on the Equity IRR and utilization of land broadly as under.<br />
i. GoAP has categorically clarified that article 10 (3) of the Concession<br />
Agreement gives the right to HIAL to set tariffs for non-airport facilities<br />
and services. The concession does not envisage cross subsidy of Non<br />
Airport revenues to defray aeronautical charges.<br />
ii. GoAP also clarified that Cargo, Ground Handling and Fuel should not be<br />
regulated. GoAP also clarified that under clause 2.3b(i) of State Support<br />
Agreement, its necessary to maintain an Equity Internal Rate of Return<br />
of 18.33%. It was further clarified that 18.33% was not a cap on the<br />
return on equity.<br />
iii. GoAP also clarified that the land given was for the economic and social<br />
development of the state and by reducing its market value from the<br />
RAB, the desired objective will not be achieved.<br />
CP No. 9/2013-14/T-12023(14)/1/2012- Tariff- Vol - <strong>II</strong>I <strong>Annexure</strong> <strong>II</strong>-B Page 9 of 51<br />
9