28.06.2013 Views

Annexure II - AERA

Annexure II - AERA

Annexure II - AERA

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

a. Land LeaseAgreement<br />

As per Clause 3.1 (a) of the Land Lease Agreement dated 30th<br />

September,2003, the land is permitted to be used for the purpose of<br />

construction of Airport as per the provisions of the Concession Agreement<br />

i.e. Project as defined therein.<br />

As per Clause 3.1 (b) the land also has been permitted to use for other<br />

commercial purposes including but not limited to the following:<br />

"hotels, resorts, flight catering, air craft maintenance, cargo and logistics<br />

centre, convention centre, golf courses, recreation and entertainment<br />

facilities, industrial facilities, fuel farms, terminalling facilities, power plants,<br />

storage and processing terminals, water treatment facilities, commercial<br />

and residential complexes and to undertake any other lawful commercial<br />

activity at the Airport. <strong>II</strong><br />

Thus it is clear that the purpose of land lease is twofold i.e. for (a) Airport<br />

and (b) Non-Airport activities.<br />

Hence, as per the provisions of the <strong>AERA</strong> Act, the Regulator is authorised to<br />

determine charges pertaining to the aeronautical charges at the Airport and<br />

as such the Regulator has no jurisdiction over the Non-Airport activities.<br />

b. GoAP position on land<br />

<strong>Annexure</strong> <strong>II</strong>-B<br />

We understand that the Govt. of AP has written to <strong>AERA</strong> clarifying its<br />

position on the Equity IRR and utilization of land broadly as under.<br />

i. GoAP has categorically clarified that article 10 (3) of the Concession<br />

Agreement gives the right to HIAL to set tariffs for non-airport facilities<br />

and services. The concession does not envisage cross subsidy of Non­<br />

Airport revenues to defray aeronautical charges.<br />

ii. GoAP also clarified that Cargo, Ground Handling and Fuel should not be<br />

regulated. GoAP also clarified that under clause 2.3b(i) of State Support<br />

Agreement, its necessary to maintain an Equity Internal Rate of Return<br />

of 18.33%. It was further clarified that 18.33% was not a cap on the<br />

return on equity.<br />

iii. GoAP also clarified that the land given was for the economic and social<br />

development of the state and by reducing its market value from the<br />

RAB, the desired objective will not be achieved.<br />

CP No. 9/2013-14/T-12023(14)/1/2012- Tariff- Vol - <strong>II</strong>I <strong>Annexure</strong> <strong>II</strong>-B Page 9 of 51<br />

9

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!