Annexure II - AERA
Annexure II - AERA
Annexure II - AERA
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
management and administration. Consistent with the form of economic<br />
oversight adopted, these costs may be offset by non-aeronautical revenues.<br />
Conclusion:<br />
ICAD does not endorse the Single Till regulation as most preferred form of regulation and<br />
instead has taken a neutral position.<br />
ICAD left till issue to the respective member states to adopt their choice of till based on<br />
suitability to local condition.<br />
Since the Concession Agreement contemplated a Dual Till and ICAD left the choice of Till to the<br />
member states, we request MoCA being a member state to advise <strong>AERA</strong> to adopt Dual Till in<br />
consonance with the provisions of the Concession Agreement.<br />
A detailed analysis in this respect carried out by an independent agency M/s NERA (Consultant<br />
of International repute having 20 offices across North America, Europe and Asia pacific and<br />
ranked as No. 1 in consulting in year 2009, 2010 and 2011 by Vault .com) is enclosed as<br />
<strong>Annexure</strong> A<br />
b. Govt. of Andhra Pradesh (GoAP) stand on Till<br />
We understand that the Govt. of Andhra Pradesh (GoAP) has written to <strong>AERA</strong><br />
clarifying its position on Till:<br />
GoAP has categorically clarified that article 10 (3) of the Concession<br />
Agreement gives the right to HIAL to set tariffs for non-airport facilities and<br />
services. The concession does not envisage cross subsidy of Non- Aeronautical<br />
revenues to defray aeronautical charges.<br />
CONCLUSION ON TILL:<br />
1 The reading of various provisions of the CA it can be concluded that a Dual till was<br />
envisaged in the CA.<br />
2 The Ministry of Civil Aviat ion has adopted Hybrid Till for smaller airports as also<br />
for Delhi and Mumbai and as such it is illogical to assume that a Single Till would<br />
have been envisaged for Hyderabad Airport.<br />
B. Land Monetization/Usage of Land<br />
<strong>Annexure</strong> <strong>II</strong>-B<br />
As already mentioned earlier in this letter, the following are our submissions with<br />
regard to the treatment of land usage and revenue therefrom as per the provisions<br />
of Land Lease Agreement and Concession Agreement respectively:<br />
CP No. 9/2013-14/T-12023(14)/1/2012- Tariff- Vol - <strong>II</strong>I <strong>Annexure</strong> <strong>II</strong>-B Page 8 of 51<br />
8