Annexure II - AERA
Annexure II - AERA
Annexure II - AERA
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
NERA<br />
Economic Consulting<br />
• sub-concession;<br />
• real estate activities (except hotels).<br />
Conversely, non-aeronautical activities that are excluded from the perimeter of the<br />
regulatory till are:<br />
• retail activities (such as profits accrued by World Duty Free);<br />
• real estate activities (only hotels run by BAA).<br />
3. Evaluation and sale of surplus land<br />
We have examined how surplus land - i.e. land in excess of what is needed for<br />
aeronautical use - is treated in the following countries: Australia, Belgium, Denmark,<br />
France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, South Africa, The Netherlands and<br />
UK.<br />
For each country we have detected:<br />
• How surplus land is evaluated (e.g. current cost or historic cost) if it is included in<br />
the till;<br />
• Whether the surplus land can be sold and, if this is the case, whether such<br />
revenues will be included in the regulatory till.<br />
The results of our analysis can be summarized as follows:<br />
• In cases where surplus land (i.e. land used for non-aeronautical activities) is<br />
included in the till, it can be evaluated either at current cost (Ireland, Italy, UK) or<br />
at historic cost (Belgium, Denmark, South Africa, The Netherlands). None of the<br />
considered airports include such land in the RAB at market price.<br />
• Surplus land can be sold in some countries (Australia, Belgium, Ireland, Germany,<br />
New Zealand, South Africa, UK). In general, sale revenues follow the same rule<br />
which applies to non-aeronautical real estate revenues. In Italy surplus land cannot<br />
be sold but it can be subleased at the same conditions which apply to nonaeronautical<br />
real estate revenues. In some other countries (France, Denmark,<br />
Sweden) there are no clear rules on the matter. In most instances there have not<br />
been precedents.<br />
The following paragraphs illustrate our analysis of the treatment of surplus land in the<br />
different jurisdictions.<br />
3.1. Australia: Adelaide, Brisbane, Melbourne, Perth and Sydney<br />
In Australia, only a price monitoring applies, therefore land used for non aeronautical<br />
activities is not evaluated in order to calculate aeronautical charges.<br />
8<br />
<strong>Annexure</strong> <strong>II</strong>-B<br />
CP No. 9/2013-14/T-12023(14)/1/2012- Tariff- Vol - <strong>II</strong>I <strong>Annexure</strong> <strong>II</strong>-B Page 46 of 51