28.06.2013 Views

Annexure II - AERA

Annexure II - AERA

Annexure II - AERA

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

NERA<br />

Economic Consulting<br />

• sub-concession;<br />

• real estate activities (except hotels).<br />

Conversely, non-aeronautical activities that are excluded from the perimeter of the<br />

regulatory till are:<br />

• retail activities (such as profits accrued by World Duty Free);<br />

• real estate activities (only hotels run by BAA).<br />

3. Evaluation and sale of surplus land<br />

We have examined how surplus land - i.e. land in excess of what is needed for<br />

aeronautical use - is treated in the following countries: Australia, Belgium, Denmark,<br />

France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, South Africa, The Netherlands and<br />

UK.<br />

For each country we have detected:<br />

• How surplus land is evaluated (e.g. current cost or historic cost) if it is included in<br />

the till;<br />

• Whether the surplus land can be sold and, if this is the case, whether such<br />

revenues will be included in the regulatory till.<br />

The results of our analysis can be summarized as follows:<br />

• In cases where surplus land (i.e. land used for non-aeronautical activities) is<br />

included in the till, it can be evaluated either at current cost (Ireland, Italy, UK) or<br />

at historic cost (Belgium, Denmark, South Africa, The Netherlands). None of the<br />

considered airports include such land in the RAB at market price.<br />

• Surplus land can be sold in some countries (Australia, Belgium, Ireland, Germany,<br />

New Zealand, South Africa, UK). In general, sale revenues follow the same rule<br />

which applies to non-aeronautical real estate revenues. In Italy surplus land cannot<br />

be sold but it can be subleased at the same conditions which apply to nonaeronautical<br />

real estate revenues. In some other countries (France, Denmark,<br />

Sweden) there are no clear rules on the matter. In most instances there have not<br />

been precedents.<br />

The following paragraphs illustrate our analysis of the treatment of surplus land in the<br />

different jurisdictions.<br />

3.1. Australia: Adelaide, Brisbane, Melbourne, Perth and Sydney<br />

In Australia, only a price monitoring applies, therefore land used for non aeronautical<br />

activities is not evaluated in order to calculate aeronautical charges.<br />

8<br />

<strong>Annexure</strong> <strong>II</strong>-B<br />

CP No. 9/2013-14/T-12023(14)/1/2012- Tariff- Vol - <strong>II</strong>I <strong>Annexure</strong> <strong>II</strong>-B Page 46 of 51

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!