Annexure II - AERA
Annexure II - AERA
Annexure II - AERA
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
NERA Economic Consulting<br />
NERA Via Basento 37<br />
Economic Consulting<br />
2nd Floor<br />
Rome 00198, Italy<br />
Tel: +39 064888101 Fax: +39 06 485838<br />
www.nera.com<br />
1. Introduction<br />
LAND TREATMENT<br />
28 March 2011<br />
On January 2011, <strong>AERA</strong> (the Airport Economic Regulatory Authority) issued the<br />
Order No. 13/2010-11 which states that:<br />
"the scope of the RAE is that, in normal course, all airport assets will come<br />
under the scope of the single till. However, the Authority may, based on due<br />
consideration of relevant factors, exclude certain assets from the scope of RAE,<br />
provided that if such assets are integral to the airport, the Authority may decide<br />
not to exclude them from the scope of RAE. This approach is reasonable as it<br />
treats the airport as one business yet at the same time enables the Authority to<br />
insulate the users from non related activities, ifany, undertaken by the airports by<br />
suitably ring fencing the relevant assets'.'<br />
The Order provides the principles governing ring fencing to be followed by <strong>AERA</strong>:<br />
"Normally, the land is given free or on highly concessional terms by the<br />
government to the airport operator. (...) In many cases, the land is much in excess<br />
of the requirements purely for the airport development. The Authority also<br />
understand that the excess land is given by the government to make the airport<br />
viable and attractive as a worthwhile investment especially for the private<br />
investors who can exploit the land for the purposes of airport development. The<br />
Authority is mandated by the Act to ensure the financial viability of the airports.<br />
Hence it would be giving Fair Rate of Return to the investors on the capital,<br />
consistent with the risk profile of the airport in question. (. ..) The Authority thus<br />
considers that the benefits of land exploitation should go to the passengers and<br />
cargo facility users in terms ofmoderating the aeronautical charges. (. ..) It would<br />
not be feasible for the Authority to prescribe treatment for all such different forms<br />
of land transfers/alienation. After deliberating on all these factors, the Authority<br />
considers that the best way to capture the benefits of land exploitation for<br />
moderating the aeronautical charges is to make suitable adjustments itself It<br />
would therefore take into account the valuation of land (and any asset thereon)<br />
See article 7.2 of Order No . 13/2010-11 issued by <strong>AERA</strong><br />
NERASrl<br />
tscntta CCIAA <strong>II</strong> 27/0912001 REA 987