Annexure II - AERA
Annexure II - AERA
Annexure II - AERA
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Regulatory Approaches in Selected Countries<br />
Country Airport Regulatorv Till<br />
Australia Adelaide, Brisbane, Melbourne, Perth, Sydney Ex post regulation<br />
Belgium Brussels Single till (moving towards dual ti I<br />
Denmark Copenhagen Hvbrid till<br />
France Charles de Gaulle, Orly Single till ....<br />
Germany Frankfurt, Hamburg Dual till<br />
Germany Berlin, Cologne-Bonn, Dusseldorf, Hannover, Munich, Stuttgart Single till<br />
Greece Athens Dual till<br />
Huriaarv Budapest, Ferihegy Dual till<br />
Ireland Dublin Si ngl e ti <strong>II</strong> * *'*<br />
Italy Rome, Milan, Venice Dual till<br />
Italy Other airports Hybrid till<br />
Malta Malta International Dual till<br />
New Zealand Auckland, Christchurch, Wellington Ex post regulation<br />
The Netherlands Amsterdam Dual till<br />
Portugal ANA airports Single till<br />
South Africa ACSA airports Single till<br />
Spain AENA airports Administrated tariffs<br />
Sweden Stockhol m-Arlanda, Mal rno Single till<br />
United Kingdom Heathrow, Gatwick, Stansted Single t ill ****<br />
* No-airport-related (non-airport) real estate activities are excluded from the regulatory till<br />
** Activities such as retail, advertising, no airport-related (non-airport) real estate, ground handling and activities carri<br />
by subsidiaries are excluded from the regulatory till<br />
*** Activities with non nexus to the airport (AerRianta International, Cork and Shannon airports, International<br />
investments, property related to joi nt ventures) are excl uded from the regulatory ti <strong>II</strong><br />
**** Some retail activities and real estate pertaining hotels are excluded from the regulatory till<br />
Source: NERA analysis<br />
Thus it is evident from the above that majority of contracting states of ICAO has<br />
adopted Dual Till approach for regulating the aeronautical service charges. A detailed<br />
analysis in this respect carried out by an independent agency MIs NERA (Consultant of<br />
International repute having 20 offices across North America, Europe and Asia Pacific and<br />
ranked as No.1 in consulting in year 2009, 2010 and 2011 by Vault.com) is enclosed as<br />
<strong>Annexure</strong> A<br />
c. European Union on Till :<br />
<strong>Annexure</strong> <strong>II</strong>-B<br />
The EU Directive, that explicitly mentions policies on airport charges endorsed<br />
by ICAO, states that:<br />
"It is necessary to establish a common framework regulating the<br />
essential features of airport charges and the way they are set [oo.}. Such a<br />
framework should be without prejudice to the possibility for a Member<br />
State to determine if and to what extent revenues from an airport's<br />
commercial activities may be taken into account in establishing airport<br />
charges." (Emphasis added) .<br />
[Source: EU Directive 2009/12/CE of the EU Parliament and of the Council of 11<br />
March 2009 on Airport Charges.]<br />
CP No. 9/2013-14/T-12023(14)/1/2012- Tariff- Vol - <strong>II</strong>I <strong>Annexure</strong> <strong>II</strong>-B Page 13 of 51<br />
13
Change language