learning - Academic Conferences Limited

learning - Academic Conferences Limited learning - Academic Conferences Limited

academic.conferences.org
from academic.conferences.org More from this publisher
27.06.2013 Views

An Analysis of Collaborative Learning as a Prevalent Instructional Strategy of South Africa Government eLearning Practices Peter Mkhize, Magda Huisman and Sam Lubbe University of South Africa, South Africa mkhizpl@unisa.ac.za madga.huisman@nwu.ac.za Sam.Lubbe@nwu.ac.za Abstract: A skills shortage seem to be engulfing the South African workplace in all economic sectors (Statistics South Africa 2010). In turn, increasing unemployment rates feed off such lack of critical skills, that cripples the productive capability of those who are suppose to be economically active. Subsequent to the 2001 parliamentary decision to migrate the government’s information system (IS) to an open source platform, the State Information Technology Agency has been faced with the task, among others, to facilitate training during and after the migration process. According to Department of Public Service and Administration (2006), different instructional delivery methods will be used – including eLearning, which allows for a lifelong learning, collaborative learning, flexible, just-in-time, just-in-context learning experience for users who are learning the new platform. In this paper, the researcher will determine the prevalent instructional strategy in relation to current instructional technology available to support eLearning practices in SITA. In doing so, the authors will employ grounded theory analysis techniques within a case study conducted in SITA – the custodian of the open source migration project (Charmaz 2006). The grounded theory analysis technique allows the authors to create a relational networks of codes, as they emerge, for interview transcripts that will be interpreted to determine the instructional value of the instructional tools used in learning practices. In this study, an instructional strategy framework is developed based on code networks as emerged from grounded theory analysis. The result proves to favour collaborative learning as an efficient and effective instructional strategy to support eLearning practices in the public sector, given multiple constraints, towards realising a fully-fledged eLearning programme. Keywords: instructional design, instructional technology, instructional strategy, collaborative learning, eLearning and eLearning delivery modes 1. Introduction After a parliamentary decision to migrate Government’s Information System (IS) to an open source platform, the project team decided on user training methods. One of these was eLearning. Meanwhile, the South African labour market has been engulfed by a skills shortage. It would thus be beneficial for those interested or struggling with facilitating skills training, to learn from eLearning practices as applied during the open source migration project. There are no reports or publications covering successful eLearning experiences in South Africa as there are reported successes in other countries (Bell 2007). In this paper, the authors investigate eLearning practices in the public sector, as used to impart skills to employees who are going to use the new open source systems. This is done by discussing relevant concepts as found in literature, and conducting an empirical investigation using the research method outlined in the research methodology section below. After that, a discussion of the results follows, incorporating a proposition emanating from the results discussion, and the conclusion of the study. 2. Literature review In this paper, the authors decided to conduct a conceptual literature review, instead of the chronological review giving a short history of the eLearning experience, and studies that investigate eLearning practices in the South African context. The following sections unpack the conceptual underpinning of eLearning practices. 2.1 eLearning in a dynamic socioeconomic environment Cross and Hamilton (2002) define eLearning as a learning process that takes place anywhere, any time, at the learner’s own pace. Acton and Golden (2003) add that eLearning is just-in-time education integrated into a high-velocity value chain. However, Asgharkani (2004) asserts that eLearning is aimed at replacing the old, traditional time/place/content predetermined learning, with a just-intime/artwork place/customised/on demand process of learning. This is learning made easy. According to Alsultanny (2006), eLearning programmes should be supported by management, in order to define 492

Peter Mkhize et al. and align the vision and plan for learning in the organisational strategy, so that learning can be integrated into the organisation’s daily activities. The author further suggests that eLearning should be used to cultivate a culture of learning in the morning, and “do” in the afternoon. Basically, organisational training has been at the heart of organisational development and performance improvement, used to support skills acquisition and development for employees, and thereby facilitating the shift from traditional (or old) methods to new methods of doing business (Taran 2006). According to Alsultanny (2006), such training should be flexible in terms of place, time and pace, in order to accommodate the different learning styles preferred by learners/employees from differing educational backgrounds. This makes it necessary for an organisation to respond more quickly to the demands of the knowledge-based global economy with an ever-growing demand for learning new skills (Alsultanny 2006). eLearning could therefore contribute towards a solution to training problems – which are related to flexibility and access to developmental training programmes, in supporting organisational growth while sustaining productivity during training. The learning process should therefore no longer be confined to lecture rooms or training rooms, as long as the student or trainee has access to internet connectivity. This is affirmed by Hunter and Carr (2002), who also argue that eLearning is easily accessible to those who have time constraints and are thus unable to attend full-time, class-bound learning programmes. Even though eLearning is gaining in popularity, Li et al. (2003) argue that it dehumanises the learning process, because students or trainees do not come into contact with the facilitator, thereby losing a sense of “belonging”. Meanwhile, Alsultanny (2006) points out the relevance and benefits of using eLearning in the training programme, where eLearning can be reactionary in dealing with the skills problems as they occur in a non-linear manner. Training programmes can then be accessible to employees in times of need, or as the need arises, at the trainee’s own pace. This is in line with the underpinning principles of eLearning as lifelong learning, flexibility of the learning process, collaborative learning, and easy access to learning. These principles are discussed in the following section. 2.2 Lifelong learning El-Khatib et al. (2003) reiterate the fact that the sustenance of the information economy is highly dependent on lifelong learning. Organisations and employees have to keep on learning to survive the revolutionary global competition and the explosion of information technology that incite the need to acquire new skills, knowledge and training. The prevalence of technology in the dynamic information economic conditions necessitates change in the workplace; likewise, skills have to be up to date (Bell 2007; Hunter and Carr 2002). This could means that employees have to improve their skills levels with the latest skills, which are necessary to face the challenges of the new economic conditions and demands. Therefore, employees who want to be productive in their area of expertise must have access to training or learning programmes that would allow for just-in-time and just-in-context learning, to address the specific skills shortage. However, employers have to provide such an environment by investing in eLearning-based training systems that will allow employees to learn as long as they still need to improve their skills, thereby contributing to corporate intelligence (Cross 2004). Lifelong learning has been a maturing topic over the years in Europe (Bell 2007; Asgharkani 2004), as many organisations recognise the need to engage in ongoing learning. In order to realise the benefits of lifelong learning, organisations utilise eLearning-based training programmes that are flexible enough to accommodate personalised learning styles – unlike traditional training models (Cross and Hamilton 2002). Fry (2001) affirms that lifelong learning is becoming the only way to survive the everchanging global economy for organisations that want to sustain competitiveness and ascertain employees’ productivity. This is even more relevant where the knowledge and skills lifespan is rapidly diminishing in the advent of new technology, which is then compelling organisations to change their production methods (Abdul-Salam et al. 2006; Acton and Golden 2003). Employers have to provide a lifelong learning environment that is timely, accessible and affordable for employees who want to upgrade their skills and knowledge in order to successfully fulfill their job responsibilities (Wiegel 2002). The eLearning model makes lifelong learning possible, as it is one of the intertwined underpinning principles of eLearning. Again, lifelong learning is more effective in a collaborative learning environment – which is discussed in the following section. 493

Peter Mkhize et al.<br />

and align the vision and plan for <strong>learning</strong> in the organisational strategy, so that <strong>learning</strong> can be integrated<br />

into the organisation’s daily activities. The author further suggests that eLearning should be<br />

used to cultivate a culture of <strong>learning</strong> in the morning, and “do” in the afternoon.<br />

Basically, organisational training has been at the heart of organisational development and performance<br />

improvement, used to support skills acquisition and development for employees, and thereby<br />

facilitating the shift from traditional (or old) methods to new methods of doing business (Taran 2006).<br />

According to Alsultanny (2006), such training should be flexible in terms of place, time and pace, in<br />

order to accommodate the different <strong>learning</strong> styles preferred by learners/employees from differing<br />

educational backgrounds. This makes it necessary for an organisation to respond more quickly to the<br />

demands of the knowledge-based global economy with an ever-growing demand for <strong>learning</strong> new<br />

skills (Alsultanny 2006). eLearning could therefore contribute towards a solution to training problems –<br />

which are related to flexibility and access to developmental training programmes, in supporting organisational<br />

growth while sustaining productivity during training.<br />

The <strong>learning</strong> process should therefore no longer be confined to lecture rooms or training rooms, as<br />

long as the student or trainee has access to internet connectivity. This is affirmed by Hunter and Carr<br />

(2002), who also argue that eLearning is easily accessible to those who have time constraints and are<br />

thus unable to attend full-time, class-bound <strong>learning</strong> programmes.<br />

Even though eLearning is gaining in popularity, Li et al. (2003) argue that it dehumanises the <strong>learning</strong><br />

process, because students or trainees do not come into contact with the facilitator, thereby losing a<br />

sense of “belonging”. Meanwhile, Alsultanny (2006) points out the relevance and benefits of using<br />

eLearning in the training programme, where eLearning can be reactionary in dealing with the skills<br />

problems as they occur in a non-linear manner. Training programmes can then be accessible to employees<br />

in times of need, or as the need arises, at the trainee’s own pace. This is in line with the underpinning<br />

principles of eLearning as lifelong <strong>learning</strong>, flexibility of the <strong>learning</strong> process, collaborative<br />

<strong>learning</strong>, and easy access to <strong>learning</strong>. These principles are discussed in the following section.<br />

2.2 Lifelong <strong>learning</strong><br />

El-Khatib et al. (2003) reiterate the fact that the sustenance of the information economy is highly dependent<br />

on lifelong <strong>learning</strong>. Organisations and employees have to keep on <strong>learning</strong> to survive the<br />

revolutionary global competition and the explosion of information technology that incite the need to<br />

acquire new skills, knowledge and training. The prevalence of technology in the dynamic information<br />

economic conditions necessitates change in the workplace; likewise, skills have to be up to date (Bell<br />

2007; Hunter and Carr 2002). This could means that employees have to improve their skills levels<br />

with the latest skills, which are necessary to face the challenges of the new economic conditions and<br />

demands.<br />

Therefore, employees who want to be productive in their area of expertise must have access to training<br />

or <strong>learning</strong> programmes that would allow for just-in-time and just-in-context <strong>learning</strong>, to address<br />

the specific skills shortage. However, employers have to provide such an environment by investing in<br />

eLearning-based training systems that will allow employees to learn as long as they still need to improve<br />

their skills, thereby contributing to corporate intelligence (Cross 2004).<br />

Lifelong <strong>learning</strong> has been a maturing topic over the years in Europe (Bell 2007; Asgharkani 2004), as<br />

many organisations recognise the need to engage in ongoing <strong>learning</strong>. In order to realise the benefits<br />

of lifelong <strong>learning</strong>, organisations utilise eLearning-based training programmes that are flexible<br />

enough to accommodate personalised <strong>learning</strong> styles – unlike traditional training models (Cross and<br />

Hamilton 2002). Fry (2001) affirms that lifelong <strong>learning</strong> is becoming the only way to survive the everchanging<br />

global economy for organisations that want to sustain competitiveness and ascertain employees’<br />

productivity. This is even more relevant where the knowledge and skills lifespan is rapidly<br />

diminishing in the advent of new technology, which is then compelling organisations to change their<br />

production methods (Abdul-Salam et al. 2006; Acton and Golden 2003). Employers have to provide a<br />

lifelong <strong>learning</strong> environment that is timely, accessible and affordable for employees who want to upgrade<br />

their skills and knowledge in order to successfully fulfill their job responsibilities (Wiegel 2002).<br />

The eLearning model makes lifelong <strong>learning</strong> possible, as it is one of the intertwined underpinning<br />

principles of eLearning. Again, lifelong <strong>learning</strong> is more effective in a collaborative <strong>learning</strong> environment<br />

– which is discussed in the following section.<br />

493

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!