27.06.2013 Views

learning - Academic Conferences Limited

learning - Academic Conferences Limited

learning - Academic Conferences Limited

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Jake Leith et al.<br />

One comment in particular highlighted the significance of problems associated with lack of internet<br />

access at crucial points in the course: “for the entire first term we had problems installing the internet<br />

at home, this made connecting with information that was only available on the internet an obstacle in<br />

accessing information. It shouldn’t be assumed that everyone has full internet access”.<br />

Students still valued the face-to-face elements of the teaching – in particular talks from visiting<br />

lecturers (“I enjoyed the Tom Savigar lecture the most, it was very interesting”; “BJ Cunningham<br />

lecture was great EVERYONE was talking about it”), and face-to-face tutorials. We will be looking at<br />

the possibility next year of including live web conferencing that should simulate many of the benefits<br />

of face to face talks from external practitioners whilst reducing the number of hours required of their<br />

time.<br />

Opinion was divided on the usefulness of online peer assessment (40% found it useful or very useful).<br />

7. Staff team experiences on the impact of the design and implementation of<br />

blended <strong>learning</strong><br />

7.1 Designing the new course content<br />

The short timeframe in which the new course content had to be implemented meant that in many<br />

cases the material was being produced “as we went along”.<br />

The weekly audio podcasts provided by the Course Leader during this academic year were intended<br />

to aid students with general feedback in an informal, ‘human’ manner, more akin to the aural qualities<br />

associated with face to face delivery. These included ‘tip of the week’, which became a weekly feature<br />

of the podcast. The Course Leader, new to the production of podcasts, found it helpful to make bullet<br />

points and prepare written elements of text before making the audio recording. An added advantage<br />

on one or two occasions was the ability to record podcasts in advance and then use the VLE’s ‘timed<br />

release’ function to publish it for students at a predetermined future date.<br />

There was a steep <strong>learning</strong> curve for staff and HPL’s involved in the production of captured lectures.<br />

Again short notice and lack of time available resulted in perhaps not enough “redesign” of content. We<br />

also recognise the need to address intellectual property issues surrounding the capture of lectures by<br />

HPL’s.<br />

7.2 Delivery<br />

As noted above, email was a prime method of communication for the majority of students.<br />

Unfortunately due to circumstances beyond our control, some first year students were not able to<br />

access their university email for several weeks at the start of the first term. This caused considerable<br />

problems, but validated the need for a blended approach to <strong>learning</strong>, as the face-to-face introductory<br />

and project briefing sessions at the start of the term became essential in allowing us to recognise and<br />

deal with the problem.<br />

The online format of the “week by week” programme noted above was supplemented by a hard copy<br />

timetable and project briefing document. These were also stored on the VLE in downloadable form.<br />

We realised early on that the documents (in particular the timetable) needed to be more visually<br />

consistent with the online format, as this could have assisted the students in navigating the VLE.<br />

7.3 Assessment<br />

Online formative peer assessment (using Turnitin software) was conducted to help focus the students’<br />

thinking and provide an opportunity to critically reflect on each other’s projects. This aspect of the<br />

assessment process was complemented with a face to face tutorial session. Students appreciated<br />

being able to see what other groups were doing and assess their progress against this.<br />

Several additional points of assessment were introduced by breaking the projects down into “chunks”.<br />

This was helpful not only to give students structure to their project but also in providing staff with<br />

clearly defined stages to pick up on progress with students. It was also recognised during the delivery<br />

of the project that these stages needed to be more clearly integrated with the delivery of online<br />

materials to facilitate the students’ understanding of these.<br />

405

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!