learning - Academic Conferences Limited
learning - Academic Conferences Limited learning - Academic Conferences Limited
Andrea Kelz system. Most other universities taking part in the survey also use open source solutions such as ILIAS or some kind of combination of in-house and open source learning management systems. While competence building in e-learning and blended learning at universities still mostly takes place autonomously, the following universities are jointly offering a nationwide “E-Learning Certificate”: the Universities of Innsbruck, Salzburg, Linz, Graz and Klagenfurt; the University of Business Administration Vienna, the Medical University Graz, the University of Arts in Linz, the Universities of Applied Sciences of Upper Austria, Salzburg, Vorarlberg and Kufstein, the University College Tyrol, the Education Service Tyrol and the Management Centre Innsbruck. The course programme consists of three modules which are offered at beginners’ and advanced levels. Module 1 comprises media didactics in teaching at universities (use of media in teaching, installation and use of e-learning courses in LMS systems and collaborative e-learning), module 2 focuses on media production (digital photography, e-learning and law, e-learning and web 2.0) and module 3 covers questions such as media organisation and e-moderation. If participants have completed all three modules at a minimum of two course providers within 18 months they can apply for an e-learning certificate. The certificate course is understood as a professional development instrument and is offered free of charge. For further information please go to http://www.zertifikat-elearning.at/?home=1. Finally, the Austrian Federal Ministry of Education, Arts and Culture defined the pedagogical and didactical use of IT (especially EPICT) as one of several innovative and integrative principles. Taking account of the principle is demanded in all areas of further education and training and supported by specific initiatives. EPICT – the European Pedagogical ICT Licence – is a comprehensive, flexible and efficient in-service training course introducing a European quality standard for the continued professional development of teachers in the pedagogical integration of information, media and communication technologies (ICT) in education. The European Pedagogical ICT Licence can be acquired after successful completion of a minimum of eight modules of which four are compulsory and four can be chosen out of ten optional modules. The obligatory modules focus on understanding the pedagogical role of ICT in teaching, acquiring basic ICT skills, searching and communicating with internet tools, creating and sharing content, and understanding the requirements of bringing innovation to schools and universities. For further information please go to http://www.epict.org/. 7. Conclusion We have been witnessing a paradigm change in higher education for quite some time now and like in most other universities ICT has become integrated into all courses of our degree programmes. However, as ICT needs to be more than the technology itself and the content it carries, it is not sufficient to provide technical support and technical training to both students and teachers. As students and teachers act in both face-to-face and virtual classroom situations they have to build new learning and teaching concepts. Students need to become more autonomous learners and teachers need to develop the skills to teach blended learning courses effectively. In view of the importance of a successful long-term, campus-wide, blended learning strategy we constantly have to review and analyse the development of our own blended learning practices. The factors critical to the success of blended learning approaches are definitely sufficient training and continual support of the concerned students, teachers and administrators at all levels. Students and teachers do not necessarily mind change but being made to change and become blended learning students and teachers in a new learning and teaching environment turned out to be quite a challenge. So far there has been no direct reward or motivation for members of the teaching staff to make the effort to incorporate ICT and blended learning activities into their courses. The primary incentives have been intrinsic rewards such as personal professional development in terms of teaching techniques, positive student feedback and peer recognition. The main problems which still need to be solved don’t concern the implementation of a blended learning approach in terms of ICT, changing learning environments and roles of the students and teachers, but the impact of blended learning on teacher workload. Compared to traditional teaching blended learning designs involve more time to develop activities and proper course materials. So the next question to be tackled is how the teachers’ workload can be measured effectively when it comes to the preparation of online materials and blended learning activities. With many teachers there’s still a sort of unwillingness to experiment with innovation and the possibilities the use of ICT offers as they do not only lack time but also some sort of extrinsic motivation. We have to find a way to encourage more faculty members and freelancers to develop web-based activities. Financial incentives are being discussed at the moment, but so far we haven’t found any real solution to the problem. 368
Andrea Kelz Within the last seven years it has proved that the use of ICT requires a continuous process of development of competencies online teachers should have and demands professional preparation and proper pedagogical and didactical training. Face-to-face teaching has remained central in our still campus-based institution and blended learning is mainly received as distance learning, enriched by ICT, supplementing on-campus degree programmes. In future even more emphasis will have to be put on the pedagogy and didactics of blended learning as some teachers unfortunately still think that it is possible to simply transfer their teaching material and activities used in the classroom to the web. Many teachers still have to learn how to cope with the role of becoming facilitators in the learning process and have to realize that a learning management system is more than a digital library to store and provide learning materials. Only then they will stop to wonder why no one uses the discussion forums they provided in their courses. References Apel, Heino et al (2003) Online Lehren. Planung und Gestaltung netzbasierter Weiterbildung, Bertelsmann, Bielefeld. EvaSys – Education Survey Automation Suite (2011) [online], Electric Paper Official Website, http://www.electricpaper.biz/products/evasys-education.html. European Pedagogical ICT Licence (2011) [online], EPICT Official Website, http://www.epict.org/concept.shtml. Forum Neue Medien Austria (2011) [online], FNM Official Website, http://www.fnm-austria.at/Home/Home/. Garrison, D. Randy and Vaughan, Norman D. (2008) Blended Learning in Higher Education: Framework, Principles, and Guidelines, John Wiley & Sons, San Francisco. Gierke, Christiane et al (2003) Vom Trainer zum E-Trainer. Neue Chancen für den Trainer von morgen, GABAL, Offenbach. ILIAS Open Source e-Learning (2011) [online], ILIAS Official Website, http://www.ilias.de/docu/goto_docu_cat_580.html. Kelz, A. (2008) “E-Learning Strategies in Technical Part-Time Studies – Constructivist and Collaborative Approaches to Learning and Teaching”, 7 th European Conference on e-Learning, Volume 1, APL, Reading, pp 557-563. Reinmann-Rothmaier, Gabi (2003) Didaktische Innovation durch Blended Learning. Leitlinien anhand eines Beispiels aus der Hochschule. Huber Psychologie Praxis. Lernen mit neuen Medien, Verlag Hans Huber, Bern. Smith, T. C. (2005) “Fifty-One Competencies for Online Instruction”, [online], The Journal of Educators Online, Volume 2, Number 2, July 2005, http://www.thejeo.com/Ted%20Smith%20Final.pdf. Walitsch, M. (2008) “Successful Blended Learning Concept for Non-Traditional University Access in Austria”, Proceedings of the IADIS International Conference on e-Learning 2009, Algarve, Portugal 17-20 June 2009, pp 253-256. Zertifikat eLearning (2011) [online], Official Website, http://www.zertifikat-elearning.at/?home=1. 369
- Page 344 and 345: Rose Heaney and Megan Anne Arroll J
- Page 346 and 347: Amanda Jefferies learning was furth
- Page 348 and 349: Amanda Jefferies way in which the o
- Page 350 and 351: Amanda Jefferies their teaching mat
- Page 352 and 353: A Methodology for Incorporating Usa
- Page 354 and 355: Anne Jelfs and Chetz Colwell To try
- Page 356 and 357: Anne Jelfs and Chetz Colwell We wor
- Page 358 and 359: The Virtual Learning Environment -
- Page 360 and 361: John Jessel 2.1 An outline framewor
- Page 362 and 363: John Jessel teachers who agreed to
- Page 364 and 365: John Jessel ‘“reduce the clicks
- Page 366 and 367: Mutlimodal Teaching Through ICT Edu
- Page 368 and 369: Paraskevi Kanari and Georgios Potam
- Page 370 and 371: Paraskevi Kanari and Georgios Potam
- Page 372 and 373: Rosario Kane-Iturrioz Regarding lan
- Page 374 and 375: Rosario Kane-Iturrioz Figure 2: Exa
- Page 376 and 377: Rosario Kane-Iturrioz Tests very us
- Page 378 and 379: Rosario Kane-Iturrioz When compared
- Page 380 and 381: Rosario Kane-Iturrioz Although the
- Page 382 and 383: Jana Kapounova et al. eLearning is
- Page 384 and 385: Jana Kapounova et al. Each dimensio
- Page 386 and 387: Jana Kapounova et al. project, conn
- Page 388 and 389: Acknowledgments Jana Kapounova et a
- Page 390 and 391: Andrea Kelz skills and competences
- Page 392 and 393: Andrea Kelz web-based activities in
- Page 396 and 397: Open Courses: The Next big Thing in
- Page 398 and 399: Kaido Kikkas et al. However, in the
- Page 400 and 401: Kaido Kikkas et al. generation of w
- Page 402 and 403: Kaido Kikkas et al. Occasional gue
- Page 404 and 405: John Knight and Rebecca Rochon guid
- Page 406 and 407: Evaluation of Quality of Learning S
- Page 408 and 409: Eugenijus Kurilovas et al. Essalmi
- Page 410 and 411: Eugenijus Kurilovas et al. (LOs), l
- Page 412 and 413: Eugenijus Kurilovas et al. Then hie
- Page 414 and 415: Eugenijus Kurilovas et al. If we lo
- Page 416 and 417: Models of eLearning: The Developmen
- Page 418 and 419: Stella Lee et al. Converging (AC a
- Page 420 and 421: Stella Lee et al. knowledge. Meta k
- Page 422 and 423: Stella Lee et al. Figure 3: Home pa
- Page 424 and 425: Stella Lee et al. Azevedo, R., Crom
- Page 426 and 427: Jake Leith et al. opportunities ble
- Page 428 and 429: Jake Leith et al. Data was collecte
- Page 430 and 431: Jake Leith et al. their informal sk
- Page 432 and 433: Jake Leith et al. For the summative
- Page 434 and 435: Sophisticated Usability Evaluation
- Page 436 and 437: Stephanie Linek and Klaus Tochterma
- Page 438 and 439: Stephanie Linek and Klaus Tochterma
- Page 440 and 441: Stephanie Linek and Klaus Tochterma
- Page 442 and 443: Social Networks, eLearning and Inte
Andrea Kelz<br />
system. Most other universities taking part in the survey also use open source solutions such as ILIAS<br />
or some kind of combination of in-house and open source <strong>learning</strong> management systems.<br />
While competence building in e-<strong>learning</strong> and blended <strong>learning</strong> at universities still mostly takes place<br />
autonomously, the following universities are jointly offering a nationwide “E-Learning Certificate”: the<br />
Universities of Innsbruck, Salzburg, Linz, Graz and Klagenfurt; the University of Business<br />
Administration Vienna, the Medical University Graz, the University of Arts in Linz, the Universities of<br />
Applied Sciences of Upper Austria, Salzburg, Vorarlberg and Kufstein, the University College Tyrol,<br />
the Education Service Tyrol and the Management Centre Innsbruck. The course programme consists<br />
of three modules which are offered at beginners’ and advanced levels. Module 1 comprises media<br />
didactics in teaching at universities (use of media in teaching, installation and use of e-<strong>learning</strong><br />
courses in LMS systems and collaborative e-<strong>learning</strong>), module 2 focuses on media production (digital<br />
photography, e-<strong>learning</strong> and law, e-<strong>learning</strong> and web 2.0) and module 3 covers questions such as<br />
media organisation and e-moderation. If participants have completed all three modules at a minimum<br />
of two course providers within 18 months they can apply for an e-<strong>learning</strong> certificate. The certificate<br />
course is understood as a professional development instrument and is offered free of charge. For<br />
further information please go to http://www.zertifikat-e<strong>learning</strong>.at/?home=1.<br />
Finally, the Austrian Federal Ministry of Education, Arts and Culture defined the pedagogical and<br />
didactical use of IT (especially EPICT) as one of several innovative and integrative principles. Taking<br />
account of the principle is demanded in all areas of further education and training and supported by<br />
specific initiatives. EPICT – the European Pedagogical ICT Licence – is a comprehensive, flexible and<br />
efficient in-service training course introducing a European quality standard for the continued<br />
professional development of teachers in the pedagogical integration of information, media and<br />
communication technologies (ICT) in education. The European Pedagogical ICT Licence can be<br />
acquired after successful completion of a minimum of eight modules of which four are compulsory and<br />
four can be chosen out of ten optional modules. The obligatory modules focus on understanding the<br />
pedagogical role of ICT in teaching, acquiring basic ICT skills, searching and communicating with<br />
internet tools, creating and sharing content, and understanding the requirements of bringing<br />
innovation to schools and universities. For further information please go to http://www.epict.org/.<br />
7. Conclusion<br />
We have been witnessing a paradigm change in higher education for quite some time now and like in<br />
most other universities ICT has become integrated into all courses of our degree programmes.<br />
However, as ICT needs to be more than the technology itself and the content it carries, it is not<br />
sufficient to provide technical support and technical training to both students and teachers. As<br />
students and teachers act in both face-to-face and virtual classroom situations they have to build new<br />
<strong>learning</strong> and teaching concepts. Students need to become more autonomous learners and teachers<br />
need to develop the skills to teach blended <strong>learning</strong> courses effectively.<br />
In view of the importance of a successful long-term, campus-wide, blended <strong>learning</strong> strategy we<br />
constantly have to review and analyse the development of our own blended <strong>learning</strong> practices. The<br />
factors critical to the success of blended <strong>learning</strong> approaches are definitely sufficient training and<br />
continual support of the concerned students, teachers and administrators at all levels. Students and<br />
teachers do not necessarily mind change but being made to change and become blended <strong>learning</strong><br />
students and teachers in a new <strong>learning</strong> and teaching environment turned out to be quite a challenge.<br />
So far there has been no direct reward or motivation for members of the teaching staff to make the<br />
effort to incorporate ICT and blended <strong>learning</strong> activities into their courses. The primary incentives<br />
have been intrinsic rewards such as personal professional development in terms of teaching<br />
techniques, positive student feedback and peer recognition. The main problems which still need to be<br />
solved don’t concern the implementation of a blended <strong>learning</strong> approach in terms of ICT, changing<br />
<strong>learning</strong> environments and roles of the students and teachers, but the impact of blended <strong>learning</strong> on<br />
teacher workload. Compared to traditional teaching blended <strong>learning</strong> designs involve more time to<br />
develop activities and proper course materials. So the next question to be tackled is how the teachers’<br />
workload can be measured effectively when it comes to the preparation of online materials and<br />
blended <strong>learning</strong> activities. With many teachers there’s still a sort of unwillingness to experiment with<br />
innovation and the possibilities the use of ICT offers as they do not only lack time but also some sort<br />
of extrinsic motivation. We have to find a way to encourage more faculty members and freelancers to<br />
develop web-based activities. Financial incentives are being discussed at the moment, but so far we<br />
haven’t found any real solution to the problem.<br />
368