learning - Academic Conferences Limited
learning - Academic Conferences Limited learning - Academic Conferences Limited
Acknowledgments Jana Kapounova et al. This work was supported by the Czech Science Foundation under the contract No. 406090242. References Åström, E. (2009) E-learning quality. Swedish National Agency for Higher Education, Stockholm : Sweden. Clark, R. C., Mayer, R. E. (2002) e-Learning and the Science of Instruction: Proven Guidelines for Consumers and Designers of Multimedia Learning. San Francisco : Pfeiffer. Cummings, H. (2006) Management Information Systems for the Information Age. Toronto : McGraw-Hill Ryerson. Eger, L. (2004) E-learning, evaluace e-learningu + případová studie z projektu Comenius. Plzeň : Západočeská univerzita, Freibergová, Z. (2000) Hodnocení kvality studijních programů. Praha : CSVŠ. Huges, G, Attwell, J. (2003) A framework for the evaluation of e-learning [online], London : KnowNet, . Kapounová, J. (2007) Approaches to the evaluation of eLearning. Proceedings of the Computer Based Learning in Science conference, pp. 208–214. Kapounová, J., Šarmanová, J. (2010) The Evaluation of eLearning Study Supports. Proceedings of the Computer Based Learning in Science conference, pp. 103–109. Khan, B. (2005) Managing e-learning: design, delivery, implementation and evaluation. Information Science Pub. Lacko, B. (2009) Zásady moderního projektového řízení. [online], http://lacko.otw.cz/eseje/Co_je_projektoverizeni.doc.pdf. Lojda, J. (1999) Význam kvality v distančním vzdělávání. In Distanční vzdělávání v České republice – současnost a budoucnost. Praha: CSVŠ – NCDiV, Mechlová, E. (2008) Tvorba e-learningových kurzů pro technické obory. Ostrava : Technical University of Ostrava, Poulová, P. et al. (2006) Efektivita e-learningových kurzů. In Distanční vzdělávání v České republice – současnost a budoucnost. Praha: CSVŠ – NCDiV, Šarmanová, J. (2009) E-learningové prvky pro podporu výuky odborných a technických předmětů (eLearning Elements Used for Support in Teaching of Specialities and Technical Subjects). Project report. Ostrava : Technical University of Ostrava. Schwalbe, K. (2007) Information Technology Project Management. UK : Amazon. Systems Development Life Cycle (2011) [online], http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Systems_Development_Life_Cycle . Winfrey, E. C. (1999) Kirkpatrick's Four Levels of Evaluation. In Hoffman, B. (Ed.), Encyclopedia of Educational Technology. [online], http://coe.sdsu.edu/eet/Articles/k4levels/start.htm. Zlámalová, H. (2002) Principy distanční vzdělávací technologie a možnosti jejího využití v pedagogické praxi na technických vysokých školách. [online], http://virtual.cvut.cz/telel/zlamalova.html. 362
Bridging the Gap – From Teacher to eTeacher Andrea Kelz University of Applied Sciences Burgenland, Campus Pinkafeld, Austria andrea.kelz@fh-burgenland.at Abstract: Virtual learning environments have become part of nearly every educational programme in higher and further education. Hence, competent teachers, tutors and trainers are a major key to success in higher education and need a thorough grounding in how to design, produce, use and evaluate e-learning and blended learning resources. But how do teachers actually gain the skills and insights you need to practice e-learning and blended learning effectively and efficiently and how do they develop a critical understanding of the pedagogical issues involved in the design, development and implementation of e-learning in their professional context? This paper focuses on the support offered to acquire and extend the skills needed to “teach online” from the institutional point of view of an Austrian university of applied sciences. It is shown in what way an institution tries to support teachers to gain the know-how to “transform” their teaching methods, to support them to make effective use of learning management systems and the web as an educational resource. Finally, the paper refers to what kind of nationwide training is offered to university teachers to develop the competencies needed to teach online effectively. Keywords: e-teaching, e-qualifications, train the trainer, professional development 1. Starting point In line with the principles of the treaty of Bologna to converge higher educational systems towards a more transparent system, a transformation of all diploma programmes at Campus Pinkafeld into bachelor’s and master’s degree programmes started in 2004. Since then Campus Pinkafeld has been offering part-time degree programmes using a blended learning approach, allowing for a combination of on-site and off-campus study modules. Our part-time students can pursue degrees in two core competences, either in energy and environmental management or in health management and health promotion. In addition, students without an ‘A’ level equivalent may qualify to study at our university of applied sciences if they pass the accreditation examination in the required subjects. Similar to our bachelor’s and master’s part-time courses the preparatory courses for the required subjects are also based on a blended learning approach (cf. Walitsch 2008). Generally, all students at Campus Pinkafeld enjoy the same level of academic assistance, regardless of whether they opt to study full- or part-time. The 250 full-time students use the infrastructure of the campus and its adjoining technology centre Monday through Friday while the 350 part-time students complete their programmes through blended learning, which mixes a schedule of on-campus studies on weekends with additional studies using an internet-based platform. This resulted in the overall reduction of the amount of on-site teaching hours by at least one third. The overall design of the part-time programmes at Campus Pinkafeld implies two major organisational differences. First, courses only take place at weekends and second, the amount of face-to-face teaching was reduced by about one third. Offering part-time programmes only at weekends, i. e. Friday afternoons and Saturdays, contributed decisively to a wider acceptance of the technical degree programmes in the field of energy and environmental management as they do not only enable more local people to continue to work alongside their studies but also allow people living in remote areas to participate in the degree programmes. Second, a new constructivist-based didactic framework and its corresponding teaching methods and learning strategies were established to help part-time students acquire the relevant skills and competences for their future field of work. Both objectives could be achieved by technology-aided blended learning settings as they allow for a considerable reduction of face-to-face sessions and help implement new learning scenarios which are based on open, computer-aided, learner-centred, self-directed and collaborative learning arrangements. 2. Blended learning strategy in general and didactic framework in particular Within the part-time degree programmes at Campus Pinkafeld blended learning is the term used to describe learning activities based on a combination of traditional face-to-face with computer and webbased online learning settings, multiple theories of learning and pedagogic approaches and a variety of media and tools employed in face-to-face and virtual learning environments, including traditional print materials as well as all kinds of technology-based materials and activities. The constructivistbased didactic approaches and their corresponding teaching methods and learning strategies pursued at Campus Pinkafeld are supposed to successfully help the students acquire the relevant 363
- Page 338 and 339: Rose Heaney and Megan Anne Arroll A
- Page 340 and 341: Rose Heaney and Megan Anne Arroll l
- Page 342 and 343: Rose Heaney and Megan Anne Arroll
- Page 344 and 345: Rose Heaney and Megan Anne Arroll J
- Page 346 and 347: Amanda Jefferies learning was furth
- Page 348 and 349: Amanda Jefferies way in which the o
- Page 350 and 351: Amanda Jefferies their teaching mat
- Page 352 and 353: A Methodology for Incorporating Usa
- Page 354 and 355: Anne Jelfs and Chetz Colwell To try
- Page 356 and 357: Anne Jelfs and Chetz Colwell We wor
- Page 358 and 359: The Virtual Learning Environment -
- Page 360 and 361: John Jessel 2.1 An outline framewor
- Page 362 and 363: John Jessel teachers who agreed to
- Page 364 and 365: John Jessel ‘“reduce the clicks
- Page 366 and 367: Mutlimodal Teaching Through ICT Edu
- Page 368 and 369: Paraskevi Kanari and Georgios Potam
- Page 370 and 371: Paraskevi Kanari and Georgios Potam
- Page 372 and 373: Rosario Kane-Iturrioz Regarding lan
- Page 374 and 375: Rosario Kane-Iturrioz Figure 2: Exa
- Page 376 and 377: Rosario Kane-Iturrioz Tests very us
- Page 378 and 379: Rosario Kane-Iturrioz When compared
- Page 380 and 381: Rosario Kane-Iturrioz Although the
- Page 382 and 383: Jana Kapounova et al. eLearning is
- Page 384 and 385: Jana Kapounova et al. Each dimensio
- Page 386 and 387: Jana Kapounova et al. project, conn
- Page 390 and 391: Andrea Kelz skills and competences
- Page 392 and 393: Andrea Kelz web-based activities in
- Page 394 and 395: Andrea Kelz system. Most other univ
- Page 396 and 397: Open Courses: The Next big Thing in
- Page 398 and 399: Kaido Kikkas et al. However, in the
- Page 400 and 401: Kaido Kikkas et al. generation of w
- Page 402 and 403: Kaido Kikkas et al. Occasional gue
- Page 404 and 405: John Knight and Rebecca Rochon guid
- Page 406 and 407: Evaluation of Quality of Learning S
- Page 408 and 409: Eugenijus Kurilovas et al. Essalmi
- Page 410 and 411: Eugenijus Kurilovas et al. (LOs), l
- Page 412 and 413: Eugenijus Kurilovas et al. Then hie
- Page 414 and 415: Eugenijus Kurilovas et al. If we lo
- Page 416 and 417: Models of eLearning: The Developmen
- Page 418 and 419: Stella Lee et al. Converging (AC a
- Page 420 and 421: Stella Lee et al. knowledge. Meta k
- Page 422 and 423: Stella Lee et al. Figure 3: Home pa
- Page 424 and 425: Stella Lee et al. Azevedo, R., Crom
- Page 426 and 427: Jake Leith et al. opportunities ble
- Page 428 and 429: Jake Leith et al. Data was collecte
- Page 430 and 431: Jake Leith et al. their informal sk
- Page 432 and 433: Jake Leith et al. For the summative
- Page 434 and 435: Sophisticated Usability Evaluation
- Page 436 and 437: Stephanie Linek and Klaus Tochterma
Bridging the Gap – From Teacher to eTeacher<br />
Andrea Kelz<br />
University of Applied Sciences Burgenland, Campus Pinkafeld, Austria<br />
andrea.kelz@fh-burgenland.at<br />
Abstract: Virtual <strong>learning</strong> environments have become part of nearly every educational programme in higher and<br />
further education. Hence, competent teachers, tutors and trainers are a major key to success in higher education<br />
and need a thorough grounding in how to design, produce, use and evaluate e-<strong>learning</strong> and blended <strong>learning</strong><br />
resources. But how do teachers actually gain the skills and insights you need to practice e-<strong>learning</strong> and blended<br />
<strong>learning</strong> effectively and efficiently and how do they develop a critical understanding of the pedagogical issues<br />
involved in the design, development and implementation of e-<strong>learning</strong> in their professional context? This paper<br />
focuses on the support offered to acquire and extend the skills needed to “teach online” from the institutional<br />
point of view of an Austrian university of applied sciences. It is shown in what way an institution tries to support<br />
teachers to gain the know-how to “transform” their teaching methods, to support them to make effective use of<br />
<strong>learning</strong> management systems and the web as an educational resource. Finally, the paper refers to what kind of<br />
nationwide training is offered to university teachers to develop the competencies needed to teach online<br />
effectively.<br />
Keywords: e-teaching, e-qualifications, train the trainer, professional development<br />
1. Starting point<br />
In line with the principles of the treaty of Bologna to converge higher educational systems towards a<br />
more transparent system, a transformation of all diploma programmes at Campus Pinkafeld into<br />
bachelor’s and master’s degree programmes started in 2004. Since then Campus Pinkafeld has been<br />
offering part-time degree programmes using a blended <strong>learning</strong> approach, allowing for a combination<br />
of on-site and off-campus study modules. Our part-time students can pursue degrees in two core<br />
competences, either in energy and environmental management or in health management and health<br />
promotion. In addition, students without an ‘A’ level equivalent may qualify to study at our university of<br />
applied sciences if they pass the accreditation examination in the required subjects. Similar to our<br />
bachelor’s and master’s part-time courses the preparatory courses for the required subjects are also<br />
based on a blended <strong>learning</strong> approach (cf. Walitsch 2008). Generally, all students at Campus<br />
Pinkafeld enjoy the same level of academic assistance, regardless of whether they opt to study full- or<br />
part-time. The 250 full-time students use the infrastructure of the campus and its adjoining technology<br />
centre Monday through Friday while the 350 part-time students complete their programmes through<br />
blended <strong>learning</strong>, which mixes a schedule of on-campus studies on weekends with additional studies<br />
using an internet-based platform. This resulted in the overall reduction of the amount of on-site<br />
teaching hours by at least one third.<br />
The overall design of the part-time programmes at Campus Pinkafeld implies two major organisational<br />
differences. First, courses only take place at weekends and second, the amount of face-to-face<br />
teaching was reduced by about one third. Offering part-time programmes only at weekends, i. e.<br />
Friday afternoons and Saturdays, contributed decisively to a wider acceptance of the technical degree<br />
programmes in the field of energy and environmental management as they do not only enable more<br />
local people to continue to work alongside their studies but also allow people living in remote areas to<br />
participate in the degree programmes. Second, a new constructivist-based didactic framework and its<br />
corresponding teaching methods and <strong>learning</strong> strategies were established to help part-time students<br />
acquire the relevant skills and competences for their future field of work. Both objectives could be<br />
achieved by technology-aided blended <strong>learning</strong> settings as they allow for a considerable reduction of<br />
face-to-face sessions and help implement new <strong>learning</strong> scenarios which are based on open,<br />
computer-aided, learner-centred, self-directed and collaborative <strong>learning</strong> arrangements.<br />
2. Blended <strong>learning</strong> strategy in general and didactic framework in particular<br />
Within the part-time degree programmes at Campus Pinkafeld blended <strong>learning</strong> is the term used to<br />
describe <strong>learning</strong> activities based on a combination of traditional face-to-face with computer and webbased<br />
online <strong>learning</strong> settings, multiple theories of <strong>learning</strong> and pedagogic approaches and a variety<br />
of media and tools employed in face-to-face and virtual <strong>learning</strong> environments, including traditional<br />
print materials as well as all kinds of technology-based materials and activities. The constructivistbased<br />
didactic approaches and their corresponding teaching methods and <strong>learning</strong> strategies<br />
pursued at Campus Pinkafeld are supposed to successfully help the students acquire the relevant<br />
363