learning - Academic Conferences Limited
learning - Academic Conferences Limited learning - Academic Conferences Limited
Danny Glick and Roni Aviram most importantly, allows them to transfer the experience gained in one context to new experiences and contexts. 2) Leaning Environment: A well-designed Web-based learning environment and a user interface that is based on a theory are an integral part of a Mindful Learning Process. Plass (1998) defines user interface as the part of an application in charge of communication with the learner. Plass argues that the user interface has a key function because it conveys the functionality of a computer application to the user, and translates the user's input into a machine-specific format. 3) Learning Process: The learning process is a stage in which the learner realizes the course objectives through interaction with the course platform, content, and communication tools. Anderson (2003) argues that interaction is a critical component of the educational process, and should include three types of interaction: student-student; student-teacher; student-content. 4) Assessment: Assessment is the forth component of a Mindful Learning Process. Using traditional and alterative assessment tools, educators should assess their students’ progress and provide personalized feedback. Birenbaum (2003) claims that the course assessment tools should reflect the course goals and objectives. An online course that wishes to fulfill the MLP requirements must, first and foremost, be based on a learning theory. Bigge and Shermis (1999) claim that action, whether a part of teaching or any other activity in life, either is linked to a theory or is blind and purposeless. A teacher who does not make use of a systematic body of theory in his day-by-day decisions is behaving blindly. Consequently, any purposeful action is governed by theory. Furthermore, the learning environment, learning process and course assessment criteria should reflect the learning theory the course is based on and harmonize with each other. Figure 1: The four components of a Mindful Learning Process The goal of this paper is to check whether the research hypothesis outlined in this chapter may be accepted. To achieve that, the authors have reviewed case studies describing online courses published in peer-reviewed journals in the area of educational technology and e-learning. They authors have identified three case studies that fulfill the MLP requirements stated above, and analyzed them in terms of learning theory, learning processes, learning environment and assessment tools. To measure the impact of the MLP on course outcomes, the authors analyzed these case studies in terms of test scores and students’ perception of the e-learning experience. The next chapter provides a description of the three case studies together with the impact of the MLP-based learning environment on course outcomes. 298
Danny Glick and Roni Aviram 4. The impact of MLP on course outcomes – case study analysis 4.1 A constructivist approach to online college learning (Rovai, 2004) This paper evaluates the effectiveness of an online graduate course in education research design (N=82). This online course, which fulfills the four MLP requirements outlined in chapter 3, was designed and delivered based on constructivist epistemology. The author of this paper fulfills the first MLP requirement (Learning Theory) by linking the course to a learning theory. The author provides a detailed description of a constructivist approach to online learning and outlines the differences between traditional and constructivist learning environments. With regard to the second MLP requirement (Learning Environment), the paper fulfills this requirement by designing a learning environment that reflects the constructivist learning theory the course is based on. The course learning environment includes a wide range of constructivist-based tools such as tools for collaborative group work, Instructor-Student and Student-Student tools for interactions, tools for guided discussions, discussion boards for posting the assessment tasks, etc. The course also fulfills the third MLP requirement (Learning Process) by describing the course constructivist-based learning processes which require learners to participate in a problem-oriented discussion forum, and to solve authentic tasks requiring the evaluation of research-based case study. Finally, the course fulfills the fourth MLP requirement (Assessment) by assessing students’ progress in the course using constructivist-based assessment tools such as authentic assessment tasks, analysis of researchbased case studies, use of rubrics to assess forum discussions and collaborative work, etc. The research findings reveal that the course outcomes were positive in terms of course grades and student level of satisfaction. With regard to course grades, course letter grades were distributed as follows: F, 3 students; C, 3 students; C+, 0 students; B−, 7 students; B, 23 students; B+, 15 students; A−18 students; and A, 3 students. In other words, 69 students (81.9%) have earned an A or a B grade. To measure perceived learning effectiveness, students were asked to respond to the following item via an online survey: On a scale of 0 to 9, how much did you learn in this course, with 0 meaning you learned nothing and 9 meaning you learned more than in any other course you’ve had? The mean and standard deviation for perceived learning among this group of participants were 7.17 (on a 9-point scale) and 1.23, respectively. When comparing this course with other courses (both traditional and Web-based), students report that they learn more than in most other courses that they have learned. 4.2 Community building, emergent design and expecting the unexpected: Creating a quality eLearning experience (Thompson & MacDonald, 2005) This paper evaluates the effectiveness and factors that influence the quality of an online Synthesis Seminar, the last of ten courses required to obtain a M.Ed. at the University of Ottawa. This online course, which was based on a constructivist learning theory, fulfills the four MLP requirements. In this Synthesis Seminar, learners (N=19) reflect on their professional development throughout the M.Ed. program and demonstrate that they can apply new learnings by writing a 25-page research paper. The knowledge built throughout this learning experience was directly related to the learners’ professional and personal interests and constructed as they wrote their paper and shared insights in the discussion groups. The only content provided were brief online documents designed to support learners in this constructivist learning environment. As mandated by the University, this pass/fail course was based on assessment of the research paper. To help learners produce the best possible paper, a series of five cumulative assignments provided opportunities for formative assessment and enabled the learners to build their papers in stages. Several strategies were employed to encourage online participation: (a) online participation was included in the list of course requirements to emphasize its importance; (b) online forums were intended to be useful to the learners and designed to have the potential to engage a diverse group of people in a meaningful dialogue that would enhance their research papers; and (c) the focus of each discussion group was highlighted in the course outline and the forum moderator posted frequent reminders and encouragement. Constructivists acknowledge that learning is active, situated, and social. Consequently several strategies were implemented to facilitate community in the course. First, learners were grouped into triads; triad members were expected to give each other feedback on course assignments. Second, dialogue in the discussion groups was emphasized. Eight one-week discussion groups were strategically placed throughout the course. Learners were asked to share: aspects of their paper, 299
- Page 274 and 275: Sérgio André Ferreira et al. and
- Page 276 and 277: Sérgio André Ferreira et al. is p
- Page 278 and 279: Sérgio André Ferreira et al. Look
- Page 280 and 281: Sérgio André Ferreira et al. In F
- Page 282 and 283: To What Extent Does a Digital Audio
- Page 284 and 285: Rachel Fitzgerald consideration of
- Page 286 and 287: Rachel Fitzgerald understand, altho
- Page 288 and 289: Rachel Fitzgerald Although this is
- Page 290 and 291: Rachel Fitzgerald “The survey was
- Page 292 and 293: Messages of Support: Using Mobile T
- Page 294 and 295: Julia Fotheringham and Emily Alder
- Page 296 and 297: Julia Fotheringham and Emily Alder
- Page 298 and 299: Table 6: Results for reflective cyc
- Page 300 and 301: Blended Learning at the Alpen-Adria
- Page 302 and 303: Gabriele Frankl and Sofie Bitter to
- Page 304 and 305: Figure 4 Moodle usage among the AAU
- Page 306 and 307: Gabriele Frankl and Sofie Bitter No
- Page 308 and 309: Gabriele Frankl and Sofie Bitter wh
- Page 310 and 311: Evaluating the use of Social Networ
- Page 312 and 313: Elaine Garcia et al. The process by
- Page 314 and 315: 4.3 Data analysis Elaine Garcia et
- Page 316 and 317: Elaine Garcia et al. issues of priv
- Page 318 and 319: 8. Conclusions and recommendations
- Page 320 and 321: Elaine Garcia et al. Nabi, A. (2011
- Page 322 and 323: Danny Glick and Roni Aviram univers
- Page 326 and 327: Danny Glick and Roni Aviram opinion
- Page 328 and 329: Danny Glick and Roni Aviram Bernard
- Page 330 and 331: Andrea Gorra and Ollie Jones to hel
- Page 332 and 333: Andrea Gorra and Ollie Jones Howeve
- Page 334 and 335: Andrea Gorra and Ollie Jones Figure
- Page 336 and 337: Andrea Gorra and Ollie Jones Studen
- Page 338 and 339: Rose Heaney and Megan Anne Arroll A
- Page 340 and 341: Rose Heaney and Megan Anne Arroll l
- Page 342 and 343: Rose Heaney and Megan Anne Arroll
- Page 344 and 345: Rose Heaney and Megan Anne Arroll J
- Page 346 and 347: Amanda Jefferies learning was furth
- Page 348 and 349: Amanda Jefferies way in which the o
- Page 350 and 351: Amanda Jefferies their teaching mat
- Page 352 and 353: A Methodology for Incorporating Usa
- Page 354 and 355: Anne Jelfs and Chetz Colwell To try
- Page 356 and 357: Anne Jelfs and Chetz Colwell We wor
- Page 358 and 359: The Virtual Learning Environment -
- Page 360 and 361: John Jessel 2.1 An outline framewor
- Page 362 and 363: John Jessel teachers who agreed to
- Page 364 and 365: John Jessel ‘“reduce the clicks
- Page 366 and 367: Mutlimodal Teaching Through ICT Edu
- Page 368 and 369: Paraskevi Kanari and Georgios Potam
- Page 370 and 371: Paraskevi Kanari and Georgios Potam
- Page 372 and 373: Rosario Kane-Iturrioz Regarding lan
Danny Glick and Roni Aviram<br />
most importantly, allows them to transfer the experience gained in one context to new experiences<br />
and contexts.<br />
2) Leaning Environment: A well-designed Web-based <strong>learning</strong> environment and a user interface that<br />
is based on a theory are an integral part of a Mindful Learning Process. Plass (1998) defines user<br />
interface as the part of an application in charge of communication with the learner. Plass argues that<br />
the user interface has a key function because it conveys the functionality of a computer application to<br />
the user, and translates the user's input into a machine-specific format.<br />
3) Learning Process: The <strong>learning</strong> process is a stage in which the learner realizes the course<br />
objectives through interaction with the course platform, content, and communication tools. Anderson<br />
(2003) argues that interaction is a critical component of the educational process, and should include<br />
three types of interaction: student-student; student-teacher; student-content.<br />
4) Assessment: Assessment is the forth component of a Mindful Learning Process. Using traditional<br />
and alterative assessment tools, educators should assess their students’ progress and provide<br />
personalized feedback. Birenbaum (2003) claims that the course assessment tools should reflect the<br />
course goals and objectives.<br />
An online course that wishes to fulfill the MLP requirements must, first and foremost,<br />
be based on a <strong>learning</strong> theory. Bigge and Shermis (1999) claim that action, whether a part of<br />
teaching or any other activity in life, either is linked to a theory or is blind and purposeless. A teacher<br />
who does not make use of a systematic body of theory in his day-by-day decisions is behaving<br />
blindly. Consequently, any purposeful action is governed by theory. Furthermore, the <strong>learning</strong><br />
environment, <strong>learning</strong> process and course assessment criteria should reflect the <strong>learning</strong> theory the<br />
course is based on and harmonize with each other.<br />
Figure 1: The four components of a Mindful Learning Process<br />
The goal of this paper is to check whether the research hypothesis outlined in this chapter may be<br />
accepted. To achieve that, the authors have reviewed case studies describing online courses<br />
published in peer-reviewed journals in the area of educational technology and e-<strong>learning</strong>. They<br />
authors have identified three case studies that fulfill the MLP requirements stated above, and<br />
analyzed them in terms of <strong>learning</strong> theory, <strong>learning</strong> processes, <strong>learning</strong> environment and assessment<br />
tools. To measure the impact of the MLP on course outcomes, the authors analyzed these case<br />
studies in terms of test scores and students’ perception of the e-<strong>learning</strong> experience. The next<br />
chapter provides a description of the three case studies together with the impact of the MLP-based<br />
<strong>learning</strong> environment on course outcomes.<br />
298