learning - Academic Conferences Limited
learning - Academic Conferences Limited learning - Academic Conferences Limited
Elaine Garcia et al. issues of privacy, trust and security, and, the ambiguity of perceived benefits aside from social relationships. The issues of age and gender are important considerations within the context of SNS in both institutions and can be difficult to measure due to the nature of these groups where females and elderly members of staff are underrepresented within both institutions either due to the familiarity with the technology or due to the threat of privacy. Issues of gender are likely to be directly linked to religious, cultural and social norms within Arab states and therefore may continue to exist or take time to change as political and social change occurs within the region. Issues of gender may also be linked to age as due to these sites only recently entering the Arab world, younger generations are more conversant and comfortable with them and this may result in greater acceptance as the technology and population matures. 6.3 Motivation for use In terms of motivation for use within Al-Mustansirya there appears to be a contradiction regarding the extent to which KS is encouraged within the institution for whilst the Deputy Dean and Departmental Heads indicated KS is open and encouraged, academic staff claim it is constrained: “We always hear the term “open culture” at work but if you try to share ideas with somebody higher than you in the organisational structure you will find a wall” (AS.8). However, all interviewees agreed motivations for use will include benefits such as networking, selfexpression and KS enhancement particularly in informal environments. There was additionally however some resistance to motivation for use due to some of the issues previously found such as the perception of sites as solely social: “I consider these sites social. It is custom only to use them only for communicating with friends and relatives” (AS.7). However within Mansoura, where some use of SNS is already occurring and common as indicated by one interviewees who did consider the social aspect of SNS to be useful for KS: “SNS are useful in increasing the social bond of the staff which increases job satisfaction and makes the work environment more likable” (AS3). Furthermore within Mansoura the existing use of SNS appears to a greater understanding of potential benefits as all interviewees agree that Mansoura is already benefiting from SNS use. These benefits vary from networking, global KS, speed of communication, constructive feedback, supporting innovation, generating new ideas, mass opinion polling cheaply, developing more social/collaborative views of learning, improved motivation, engagement , creating a connection to real-life learning and finally flexibility of use as one of the interviewees at Mansoura commented: “SNS technology is already available free of charge to many people either at home, work or even while they are on move. This makes it very easy and quick to use” (AS1). The existing use within Mansoura also highlights the role that senior managers play in motivating staff to use such sites as whilst senior managers consider that SNS can act as a sensor to evaluate the popularity of their decisions and as a way to disseminate information to staff: “SNS are a good way to know the problems within the school and respond to it quickly” (SM5). However from observation of the Mansoura Faculty group within Facebook and the interviews undertaken it would appear that the contributions from senior managers are relatively limited and this is noticed by staff: I felt that the use of SNS by senior management within the school is just as a publicrelations tool rather than a means of communication and solving people problems” (AS11). 290
Elaine Garcia et al. It would appear that this lack of contribution is considered to also indicate a lack of commitment from senior managers and this is considered by academic staff to result in confusion and a lack of clear direction: “Lack of purpose and clarity of common goals of using these websites in terms of the conflict of the nature of use .......will continue in the future until we have more commitment from both senior management and academic staff” (AS6). To conclude it is clear that there are no clear policies in place within either institution to adopt and use SNS as a KS tool however the organic growth of a community of this nature within Mansoura would appear to suggest that the institution is in the early stages of adoption and may be of significance in the future. It is also clear from the results that Arabic culture and social norms play important roles in the use of SNS within these countries. Females in both countries tended to be more concerned about online privacy than males. There is, nonetheless, a general acceptance and recognition that SNS encourage and enable discussion, communication and KS. 7. Discussion From the findings it is clear that these institutions are at very differing points of development in terms of SNS usage, KS strategy and technology usage. To some extent the differences appear to highlight the importance of senior management support for whilst Mansoura appears to have a KS strategy and SNS policy in place and thereby some acceptance of SNS use, Al-Mustansirya has neither. This therefore appears to highlight the importance of senior management support, as identified in the literature, for achieving the use of SNS for KS. From both institutions issues of privacy, trust and openness seem to be prevalent. This interestingly relates to concerns identified in the previous literature but there is also a cultural dimension relating to issues of gender that are evident within Arab nations as a wider cultural issue. This consideration is not one which has been given a great deal of attention within the area of SNS literature as the majority of previous studies focus upon the role of SNS within the developed world; largely within the USA and UK. In relation to privacy and trust, as within previous studies, there appear to be a number of concerns relating to the informal nature of SNS and the manner in which users are required to combine personal and professional profiles. In addition it would appear that the inclusion of “social” within the name of such tools gives users a sense that the sites are not serious and cannot be used for work. This view is supported in both institutions. This therefore suggests that the name of the site is value laden and represents a barrier to use. Technological barriers appear to be present within both institutions but are to some extent related to age. Increased barriers to use relating to technology within Al-Mustansirya may exist more due to the nature of the organisation, its culture and strategy than necessarily in relation to individual usage although previous literature has suggested that age may be a factor. Within Al-Mustansirya for example there is no clear KS strategy and this perhaps reflects that the institution does not know how knowledge transfer can be accomplished effectively and certainly how SNS could assist in enabling this to occur. The two institutions appear to be at different stages of cultural acceptance of SNS as would be predicted from the number of existing users of Facebook within both countries. Whilst Egypt appears to be reporting benefits already from using such tools and support comes from the possibilities of social bonding, free software and easily accessible sites, within Iraq benefits relate to networking, self-expression and knowledge enhancement but its role outside that of a communication tool for friends and family is difficult for interviewees to comprehend. Overall the findings appear to suggest that the higher usage of SNS within Egypt does result in a greater acceptance and understanding of the role that SNS could play in KS whilst the slower gain in usage within Iraq seems to result in lower acceptance of formal use within the workplace. 291
- Page 266 and 267: Ana Mª Fernández-Pampillón et al
- Page 268 and 269: Ana Mª Fernández-Pampillón et al
- Page 270 and 271: Ana Mª Fernández-Pampillón et al
- Page 272 and 273: Cognitive Communication 2.0 in the
- Page 274 and 275: Sérgio André Ferreira et al. and
- Page 276 and 277: Sérgio André Ferreira et al. is p
- Page 278 and 279: Sérgio André Ferreira et al. Look
- Page 280 and 281: Sérgio André Ferreira et al. In F
- Page 282 and 283: To What Extent Does a Digital Audio
- Page 284 and 285: Rachel Fitzgerald consideration of
- Page 286 and 287: Rachel Fitzgerald understand, altho
- Page 288 and 289: Rachel Fitzgerald Although this is
- Page 290 and 291: Rachel Fitzgerald “The survey was
- Page 292 and 293: Messages of Support: Using Mobile T
- Page 294 and 295: Julia Fotheringham and Emily Alder
- Page 296 and 297: Julia Fotheringham and Emily Alder
- Page 298 and 299: Table 6: Results for reflective cyc
- Page 300 and 301: Blended Learning at the Alpen-Adria
- Page 302 and 303: Gabriele Frankl and Sofie Bitter to
- Page 304 and 305: Figure 4 Moodle usage among the AAU
- Page 306 and 307: Gabriele Frankl and Sofie Bitter No
- Page 308 and 309: Gabriele Frankl and Sofie Bitter wh
- Page 310 and 311: Evaluating the use of Social Networ
- Page 312 and 313: Elaine Garcia et al. The process by
- Page 314 and 315: 4.3 Data analysis Elaine Garcia et
- Page 318 and 319: 8. Conclusions and recommendations
- Page 320 and 321: Elaine Garcia et al. Nabi, A. (2011
- Page 322 and 323: Danny Glick and Roni Aviram univers
- Page 324 and 325: Danny Glick and Roni Aviram most im
- Page 326 and 327: Danny Glick and Roni Aviram opinion
- Page 328 and 329: Danny Glick and Roni Aviram Bernard
- Page 330 and 331: Andrea Gorra and Ollie Jones to hel
- Page 332 and 333: Andrea Gorra and Ollie Jones Howeve
- Page 334 and 335: Andrea Gorra and Ollie Jones Figure
- Page 336 and 337: Andrea Gorra and Ollie Jones Studen
- Page 338 and 339: Rose Heaney and Megan Anne Arroll A
- Page 340 and 341: Rose Heaney and Megan Anne Arroll l
- Page 342 and 343: Rose Heaney and Megan Anne Arroll
- Page 344 and 345: Rose Heaney and Megan Anne Arroll J
- Page 346 and 347: Amanda Jefferies learning was furth
- Page 348 and 349: Amanda Jefferies way in which the o
- Page 350 and 351: Amanda Jefferies their teaching mat
- Page 352 and 353: A Methodology for Incorporating Usa
- Page 354 and 355: Anne Jelfs and Chetz Colwell To try
- Page 356 and 357: Anne Jelfs and Chetz Colwell We wor
- Page 358 and 359: The Virtual Learning Environment -
- Page 360 and 361: John Jessel 2.1 An outline framewor
- Page 362 and 363: John Jessel teachers who agreed to
- Page 364 and 365: John Jessel ‘“reduce the clicks
Elaine Garcia et al.<br />
It would appear that this lack of contribution is considered to also indicate a lack of commitment from<br />
senior managers and this is considered by academic staff to result in confusion and a lack of clear<br />
direction:<br />
“Lack of purpose and clarity of common goals of using these websites in terms of the<br />
conflict of the nature of use .......will continue in the future until we have more<br />
commitment from both senior management and academic staff” (AS6).<br />
To conclude it is clear that there are no clear policies in place within either institution to adopt and use<br />
SNS as a KS tool however the organic growth of a community of this nature within Mansoura would<br />
appear to suggest that the institution is in the early stages of adoption and may be of significance in<br />
the future.<br />
It is also clear from the results that Arabic culture and social norms play important roles in the use of<br />
SNS within these countries. Females in both countries tended to be more concerned about online<br />
privacy than males. There is, nonetheless, a general acceptance and recognition that SNS encourage<br />
and enable discussion, communication and KS.<br />
7. Discussion<br />
From the findings it is clear that these institutions are at very differing points of development in terms<br />
of SNS usage, KS strategy and technology usage.<br />
To some extent the differences appear to highlight the importance of senior management support for<br />
whilst Mansoura appears to have a KS strategy and SNS policy in place and thereby some<br />
acceptance of SNS use, Al-Mustansirya has neither. This therefore appears to highlight the<br />
importance of senior management support, as identified in the literature, for achieving the use of SNS<br />
for KS.<br />
From both institutions issues of privacy, trust and openness seem to be prevalent. This interestingly<br />
relates to concerns identified in the previous literature but there is also a cultural dimension relating to<br />
issues of gender that are evident within Arab nations as a wider cultural issue. This consideration is<br />
not one which has been given a great deal of attention within the area of SNS literature as the<br />
majority of previous studies focus upon the role of SNS within the developed world; largely within the<br />
USA and UK.<br />
In relation to privacy and trust, as within previous studies, there appear to be a number of concerns<br />
relating to the informal nature of SNS and the manner in which users are required to combine<br />
personal and professional profiles. In addition it would appear that the inclusion of “social” within the<br />
name of such tools gives users a sense that the sites are not serious and cannot be used for work.<br />
This view is supported in both institutions. This therefore suggests that the name of the site is value<br />
laden and represents a barrier to use.<br />
Technological barriers appear to be present within both institutions but are to some extent related to<br />
age. Increased barriers to use relating to technology within Al-Mustansirya may exist more due to the<br />
nature of the organisation, its culture and strategy than necessarily in relation to individual usage<br />
although previous literature has suggested that age may be a factor.<br />
Within Al-Mustansirya for example there is no clear KS strategy and this perhaps reflects that the<br />
institution does not know how knowledge transfer can be accomplished effectively and certainly how<br />
SNS could assist in enabling this to occur.<br />
The two institutions appear to be at different stages of cultural acceptance of SNS as would be<br />
predicted from the number of existing users of Facebook within both countries. Whilst Egypt appears<br />
to be reporting benefits already from using such tools and support comes from the possibilities of<br />
social bonding, free software and easily accessible sites, within Iraq benefits relate to networking,<br />
self-expression and knowledge enhancement but its role outside that of a communication tool for<br />
friends and family is difficult for interviewees to comprehend.<br />
Overall the findings appear to suggest that the higher usage of SNS within Egypt does result in a<br />
greater acceptance and understanding of the role that SNS could play in KS whilst the slower gain in<br />
usage within Iraq seems to result in lower acceptance of formal use within the workplace.<br />
291