27.06.2013 Views

learning - Academic Conferences Limited

learning - Academic Conferences Limited

learning - Academic Conferences Limited

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Samuel Adu Gyamfi et al.<br />

completion of projects. Generative <strong>learning</strong> activities call for the use of cognitive apprenticeship<br />

form of instruction (Grabinger & Dunlap (1995). According to Grabinger & Dunlap (1995) in<br />

cognitive apprenticeship the goal of the teacher is to help students generalize and transfer their<br />

<strong>learning</strong> through conditionalised and indexed knowledge. This is done through the presentation of<br />

a range of tasks that encourage reflection and identification of common transferable elements<br />

across tasks.<br />

Authentic <strong>learning</strong> contexts – according to Grabinger & Dunlap (1995) authenticity is important to<br />

REALs for three reasons. First realistic problems hold more relevance to students’ needs and<br />

experiences because they can relate what they are <strong>learning</strong> to problems and goals they see every<br />

day. Secondly, because the situations students encounter during <strong>learning</strong> are authentic, they<br />

develop deeper and richer knowledge structures, leading to a higher likelihood of transfer to novel<br />

situations. Finally, because complex problems require a team approach that provides natural<br />

opportunities for learners to test and refine their ideas and to help each other understand the<br />

content, it encourages collaboration and negotiation. REALs therefore, propose anchored<br />

instructional strategies to achieve authenticity. According to Grabinger & Dunlap (1995) because<br />

anchored instructional strategies encourage students to work together to solve complex problems<br />

they are exposed to multiple perspectives in an environment that gives them the opportunity to<br />

test out their ideas, solutions and processes and consequently overcome the problem of inert<br />

knowledge.<br />

Authentic assessment strategies – Authentic assessment strategies refer to the measurement of<br />

intellectual accomplishments that are worthwhile, significant and meaningful as compared to<br />

standardized tests inherent in conventional schooling (Grabinger & Dunlap (1995). Accordingly<br />

Grabinger & Dunlap (1995), quotes Wiggins (1989) as explaining that authentic tests show the<br />

intellectual design features that emphasize complexity, stress depth more than breath, include illstructured<br />

tasks or problems, and require students to contextualize content knowledge. When<br />

applying authentic assessment to student <strong>learning</strong> and achievement, a teacher applies criteria<br />

related to “construction of knowledge, disciplined inquiry, and the value of achievement beyond<br />

the school.<br />

Co-operative support – according to Grabinger & Dunlap (1995), “working in groups helps<br />

students refine their knowledge through argumentation, structured controversy and the sharing<br />

and testing of ideas and perspectives”. “Co-operative <strong>learning</strong> and problem-solving groups also<br />

address students’ needs for scaffolding during unfamiliar <strong>learning</strong> and problem-solving activities;<br />

therefore, with the support of others in the group, students are more likely to achieve goals they<br />

may not have been able to meet on their own (Dunlap, 1999). Grabinger & Dunlap (1995) suggest<br />

problem-based <strong>learning</strong> as a REAL strategy for achieving co-operative <strong>learning</strong>. In problem-based<br />

<strong>learning</strong> students work with problems in a manner that fosters reasoning and knowledge<br />

application appropriate to their levels of <strong>learning</strong>. The skills and knowledge acquired by this study<br />

are applied back to the problem to evaluate the effectiveness of <strong>learning</strong> and to reinforce <strong>learning</strong><br />

Grabinger & Dunlap (1995).<br />

The five key principles of REALs amply demonstrate their achievement in promoting the development<br />

of PTS in higher education institutions as outlined in the literature. Indeed Grabinger (1999) has<br />

looked at some research conducted with various implementations of REALs which showed positive<br />

results.<br />

Paradoxically, research has shown that lecturers in our higher educational institutions are challenged<br />

and de-motivated on a day-to-day basis with the practicalities of teaching increasing numbers of<br />

students with a decreasing unit of resources in institutions, especially where competition for funding is<br />

fierce and where there is pressure from external reviews of research and teaching performance, Kitts<br />

& Hancock (1999). Consequently, students often find it difficult to get seating spaces in the lecture<br />

halls let alone hear what the lecturer is saying. Libraries are overcrowded, books are out of date and<br />

journal holdings lag years behind due to budgetary constraints. Therefore, the acquisition function in<br />

higher educational institutions is unduly hampered in most developing economies.<br />

Excessive student numbers have also resulted in a situation whereby academics could hardly set<br />

meaningful exercises let alone mark and present feedback to students. There is also the pressure on<br />

the academics to meet research targets in order to qualify for funding which has compounded the<br />

problem of meeting students’ needs. Therefore, students hardly had time to practice what they learn.<br />

Additionally, small group tutorials and seminars necessary for discussion exercises are hardly feasible<br />

4

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!