27.06.2013 Views

learning - Academic Conferences Limited

learning - Academic Conferences Limited

learning - Academic Conferences Limited

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Jana Dlouhá et al.<br />

<strong>learning</strong>: “surface”, “deep” and “achieving <strong>learning</strong> approach” (Biggs, 1987). Research proved that<br />

student approaches to <strong>learning</strong> considerably affect <strong>learning</strong> processes in terms of their efficiency and<br />

have an impact on the final student’s performance. The <strong>learning</strong> environment factors are explored in<br />

studies that concentrate on the educational requirements, the quality of the teaching and the nature of<br />

the assessment, but also student interests and support, the enthusiasm shown by the instructor and<br />

the opportunity for students to manage their own <strong>learning</strong> process (Richardson, 2009).<br />

New methodologies for assessment of the <strong>learning</strong> environment and its psychical (motivations) and<br />

social determinants were subsequently developed and numerous psychometric measurement<br />

techniques based on questionnaires assessing student <strong>learning</strong> experiences have already been<br />

tested so that they can be applied in practice as evaluation instruments for educational management<br />

purposes. The interest of researchers is mostly determined by the attempt to improve student<br />

performance by influencing in particular the <strong>learning</strong> environment as an external prerequisite for a<br />

good <strong>learning</strong> process and consequent success.<br />

1.2 Assessment process<br />

Assessment is a rather complex task both at an institutional or system level, and at the level of<br />

<strong>learning</strong> processes. Different factors that play a role in these processes should be aligned: not only<br />

educational goals and content, but also tasks and assessment. Evaluators of higher education<br />

teaching agree that the most commonly misaligned factor is assessment and “most assessment<br />

strategies tend to focus on what is easy to measure rather than what is important.” For success in<br />

<strong>learning</strong>, all different aspects of the <strong>learning</strong> process are relevant – for example, social interactions<br />

play a role in which students are engaged when they carry out their tasks, such as collaboration and<br />

teamwork, relationships with their tutors, and also <strong>learning</strong> environment factors. Best teaching<br />

assessment practices in higher education should capture these aspects and therefore focus on<br />

“critical thinking, problem solving, creativity, curiosity, concern for ethical issues” as well as “breadth<br />

and depth of specific knowledge”; they also reflect the “methodologies and standards of evidence<br />

used to create that knowledge”. Attention paid to these factors is a requirement of active,<br />

constructivist pedagogy, but in practice, in most cases assessment is based upon multiple-choice<br />

tests or academic essays (Reeves, 2006).<br />

Higher education has therefore many specific features that make the assessment task even more<br />

complex than at lower educational levels. Rather ambitious evaluation goals include not only<br />

assessment of outcomes, but also reflection of the <strong>learning</strong> process itself by teachers AND students<br />

themselves; assessment techniques comprise peer assessment, self-assessment, authentic<br />

assessment and other sophisticated methods. All of these assessment techniques require that<br />

students evaluate work of the same kind that they themselves are producing, and thus also obtain<br />

experience of realistic evaluation (Sadler, 2005). Besides this, they are aware of assessment criteria<br />

that are transparent and could apply to their own performance.<br />

1.3 Social <strong>learning</strong> perspective<br />

A social <strong>learning</strong> definition will be used further as an explanatory framework for the case study<br />

(Wenger, 2000); it describes this phenomenon as “an interplay between social competence and<br />

personal experience; it is a dynamic, two-way relationship between people and social <strong>learning</strong><br />

systems in which they participate. In this constellation, the necessary competences are negotiated<br />

through the experience of direct participation: engagement in joint enterprise requires that members<br />

of a community are competent to contribute to it, to interact and mutually reflect on this interaction;<br />

and they also share a common repertoire of communal resources such as language, routines, etc.<br />

According to Reed, social <strong>learning</strong> “occurs through social interactions and processes between actors<br />

within a social network, either through direct interaction, e.g., conversation, or through other media,<br />

e.g., mass media, telephone, or Web 2.0 applications” (Reed et al. 2010). A role for the open virtual<br />

space such as Wiki in education is also reported by other authors (Wheeler et al, 2008; Wheeler &<br />

Wheeler, 2009).<br />

2. Case study - MPG&SD course in the VCSE network<br />

The Multiple Perspectives on Globalization and Sustainable Development (MPG&SD) course ran over<br />

the 2009/2010 European winter semester. The course was part of the international VCSE network of<br />

European universities and participated in by students from Germany and the Czech Republic. The<br />

167

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!