learning - Academic Conferences Limited
learning - Academic Conferences Limited learning - Academic Conferences Limited
Ivana Cechova et al. Although this research was undertaken with distance students, the recommendations suggest several possibilities that could include other student groups. The research determines the strengths and weaknesses of ICT/LMS Barborka in language study and identifies the specific skills which distance students possess, enabling them to use technology effectively for learning English. However, the fundamental question remains: How to achieve balanced communicative competence of distance students and how to motivate them to practice all skills (speaking, listening comprehension, writing and reading comprehension) via the Internet in order to feel confident in English? 7. Material development The research findings show that the students predominantly miss integrated file of materials of military and management terminology with easy access. First we prepared authentic reading materials according to students needs. In the process of choice we have cooperated with teachers from specialized departments and methodologically processed them. We supplemented interactive exercises for vocabulary practice and comprehension check to provide students with appropriate feedback. This was only the first step. The following one in accordance with constructivist theory is to enable students’ active participation in the lessons. It is reflected by their own choice of vocabulary areas needed for their future specializations. Students of the 1st form of the master study programme were asked to use their knowledge of specialized military subjects as well as military training and help us with the creation of study supports for the courses of Military English and English for Management. They agreed with great enthusiasm because they can utilize the gained information and the knowledge from practical military training. In addition the chosen students have a very high level of English (Stanag SLP 3), they are interested in the military and have access to a plenty of authentic literature. Teachers and these students co-operate on a methodological processing of the authentic texts to tailor them for use in e-courses and a future e-book. The students’ involvement motivates both sides of the educational process and influences them qualitatively. Teachers profit from students’ specialized updated knowledge of the topics; students combine their knowledge from specialized subjects with English and ICT, and thus their knowledge becomes complex. From the pedagogical point of view, teachers and students become active partners in the educational process, so they both share the responsibility for students’ study, which is one of the basic goals of tertiary education (Berankova et al. 2011). In Figures 1, 2, and 3 there are examples of students’ involvement in creating study supports. Figure 1: LMS Barborka – military text 114
Figure 2: LMS Barborka – page with exercises Figure 3: LMS Barborka - Exercise Ivana Cechova et al. 115
- Page 90 and 91: Latefa Bin Fryan and Lampros Stergi
- Page 92 and 93: Latefa Bin Fryan and Lampros Stergi
- Page 94 and 95: Faculty development Online course
- Page 96 and 97: Latefa Bin Fryan and Lampros Stergi
- Page 98 and 99: Latefa Bin Fryan and Lampros Stergi
- Page 100 and 101: Alice Bird being reviewed under the
- Page 102 and 103: Alice Bird Developing the process m
- Page 104 and 105: Alice Bird Reflecting on the feasib
- Page 106 and 107: 3.3 Early stage implementation Alic
- Page 108 and 109: Enhancement of e-Testing Possibilit
- Page 110 and 111: Martin Cápay et al. of Likert scal
- Page 112 and 113: Martin Cápay et al. Figure 3 Proce
- Page 114 and 115: Martin Cápay et al. Figure 4: An e
- Page 116 and 117: Martin Cápay et al. On the other h
- Page 118 and 119: Tim Cappelli demand from students t
- Page 120 and 121: Tim Cappelli at a time and increasi
- Page 122 and 123: Tim Cappelli forms were processed a
- Page 124 and 125: Objectives More efficient and faste
- Page 126 and 127: Digital Educational Resources Repos
- Page 128 and 129: Cornélia Castro et al. Economic:
- Page 130 and 131: Cornélia Castro et al. Dimension E
- Page 132 and 133: Cornélia Castro et al. feedback on
- Page 134 and 135: Cornélia Castro et al. EdReNe (200
- Page 136 and 137: Ivana Cechova et al. The influence
- Page 138 and 139: 4. Methodology Ivana Cechova et al.
- Page 142 and 143: 8. Conclusion Ivana Cechova et al.
- Page 144 and 145: Yin Ha Vivian Chan et al. What is s
- Page 146 and 147: Yin Ha Vivian Chan et al. as a viab
- Page 148 and 149: Yin Ha Vivian Chan et al. the ILC h
- Page 150 and 151: The Development and Application of
- Page 152 and 153: Serdar Çiftci and Mehmet Akif Ocak
- Page 154 and 155: 4.3 Data collection Serdar Çiftci
- Page 156 and 157: Serdar Çiftci and Mehmet Akif Ocak
- Page 158 and 159: Table 8: Students’ responses to q
- Page 160 and 161: An Exploratory Comparative Study of
- Page 162 and 163: Marija Cubric et al. Web 2.0 tools
- Page 164 and 165: Marija Cubric et al. Despite all th
- Page 166 and 167: Marija Cubric et al. Staff profile
- Page 168 and 169: Marija Cubric et al. In case 3.2, a
- Page 170 and 171: Marija Cubric et al. Sorcinelli, M.
- Page 172 and 173: Figure 1: Adaptive eLearning system
- Page 174 and 175: Blanka Czeczotková et al. knowledg
- Page 176 and 177: Blanka Czeczotková et al. Figure 2
- Page 178 and 179: Changing Academics, Changing Curric
- Page 180 and 181: Christine Davies 2.2.4 Seminars CEL
- Page 182 and 183: Web Conferencing for us, by us and
- Page 184 and 185: Mark de Groot, paper (Elluminate 20
- Page 186 and 187: Mark de Groot, requested. The targe
- Page 188 and 189: Mark de Groot, members of the group
Figure 2: LMS Barborka – page with exercises<br />
Figure 3: LMS Barborka - Exercise<br />
Ivana Cechova et al.<br />
115