27.06.2013 Views

learning - Academic Conferences Limited

learning - Academic Conferences Limited

learning - Academic Conferences Limited

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

4. Methodology<br />

Ivana Cechova et al.<br />

In academic year 2010/11 we designed a research study the task of which was to find out if and how<br />

ICT help the distance students in their study, how distance students assess ICT in their language<br />

training and especially how the students assess LMS Barborka. For the first step of our research we<br />

chose the method of interviews which were carried out via Skype. All respondents were our distance<br />

students and graduates. The interviews were semi-structured, using an 'interview plus' approach to<br />

enhance discussion (Bloom 1953; JISC 2009). The interview questions focused on four main themes:<br />

likes and dislikes dealing with English study; language <strong>learning</strong> and ICT; LMS Barborka as a tool for<br />

language <strong>learning</strong>; LMS Barborka and its evaluation from the students’ point of view. Ten interviews<br />

were undertaken, with each lasting approximately one hour. Data were fully transcribed and entered<br />

into INVivo. Initial coding was inductive (Thomas 2006) and categories that reflected the question<br />

schedule and main trends were developed. The coded data were then reviewed by the research team<br />

and a series of key themes were determined by consensus. The data were then re-coded according<br />

to the agreed themes, and through this iterative process the project's findings emerged (Strauss,<br />

Corbin 2004). We tried to achieve answers to the following research questions:<br />

What are the students’ likes and dislikes dealing with English?<br />

How do the students evaluate LMS Barborka as a tool for studying English and how do they<br />

evaluate the study supports presented in LMS Barborka?<br />

What are the advantages and disadvantages of ICT in language <strong>learning</strong>?<br />

The second part of the research is a questionnaire aimed at creating a distance learner profile by<br />

establishing baseline data on technology use. The questions elicited prior experience and<br />

expectations of using technology for <strong>learning</strong>, and the impacts of e-<strong>learning</strong>. Then we wanted to find<br />

out if our distance students prefer to use up-to-date technologies (the Internet, an in-house Study<br />

Portal and on-line sessions in language lessons) or to be taught in a classical way (without computer<br />

technology programs), furthermore we wanted to know the students’ preferences and needs while<br />

using ICT in the language classes and the LMS Barborka utility. We wanted either to confirm or reject<br />

the following hypothesis:<br />

The students prefer the use of up-to-date technologies to a classical way of <strong>learning</strong>.<br />

ICT can influence English training in a positive way.<br />

Study materials and communication via LMS Barborka can influence English training in a positive<br />

way.<br />

The respondents were distance students of the University of Defence, the Faculty of Economics and<br />

Management.<br />

5. Findings<br />

In some answers the opinions of distance study students do not differ from those of full-time ones<br />

(research carried out in 2004-2009). All students highly appreciate the access to LMS Barborka,<br />

which offers interesting texts from different economic and military areas full of various specialized<br />

terminology. They like most especially those texts which differ from commercial textbooks and the<br />

Internet materials. In this context they often express a demand for topics regarding their<br />

specializations or military-political ones.<br />

“Topics dealing with military and terrorism, as I can’t find them anywhere else.” (R4,<br />

March 2011)<br />

“Study supports for individual topics, they are well arranged and written in readable<br />

English.” (R1, May 2011)<br />

Students asses positively the communication with their tutors, tutors’ fast response to the questions,<br />

the correction and evaluation of their homework and they also appreciate the possibility of electronic<br />

testing, mainly in terms of the necessity to pass the STANAG 6001 exam.<br />

“The evaluation of homework was a big surprise for me, it is accomplished at a high<br />

technical level.” (R9, April 2011)<br />

“The study materials enable to revise, possibly to deepen knowledge of the topics. They<br />

are useful for the STANAG 6001 exam preparation as well.”(R10, April 2011)<br />

112

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!