27.06.2013 Views

Voie d'immunisation et séquence d'administration de l ... - TEL

Voie d'immunisation et séquence d'administration de l ... - TEL

Voie d'immunisation et séquence d'administration de l ... - TEL

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

tel-00827710, version 1 - 29 May 2013<br />

population observed in the pre-enrichment fraction (Obar <strong>et</strong> al., 2008). By contrast, the<br />

t<strong>et</strong>ramer-positive cell population represents a substantial number of cells following<br />

enrichment (Figure 19B).<br />

B. Combination with intracellular staining<br />

The t<strong>et</strong>ramer-based enrichment strategy allowed us to d<strong>et</strong>ect antigen-specific T cells,<br />

enumerate them and characterize them phenotypically by looking at surface marker<br />

expression. However, we were not able to obtain any information about the functionality of<br />

these cells. To address this, we <strong>de</strong>veloped a protocol that combined the t<strong>et</strong>ramer-based<br />

enrichment with intracellular staining (Figure 20). Unfortunately, several technical hurdles<br />

became immediately apparent, most importantly that these cells nee<strong>de</strong>d restimulation in or<strong>de</strong>r<br />

to secr<strong>et</strong>e cytokines; however, this restimulation also appeared to induce TCR<br />

downregulation, inhibiting enrichment with t<strong>et</strong>ramers.<br />

In or<strong>de</strong>r to find a solution to this problem, we initially <strong>de</strong>veloped a protocol using in vivo<br />

restimulation of the cells. Three hours prior to organ harvest, mice were injected with CpG<br />

formulated with DOTAP combined with SIINFEKL pepti<strong>de</strong>. After the restimulation period<br />

and harvest, we performed t<strong>et</strong>ramer-based enrichment as previously <strong>de</strong>scribed, followed by an<br />

intracellular staining (Figure 20A, Protocol 1). In vivo, the restimulation effect was strong<br />

enough to allow for the observation of<br />

IFNγ production in, and t<strong>et</strong>ramer-positive cells at the same time (Figure 20B).<br />

Non<strong>et</strong>heless, when we attempted to examine the production of other cytokines, we were not<br />

able to d<strong>et</strong>ect a signal, perhaps due to the lower extent of restimulation in vivo. We tried again<br />

to optimize a protocol with ex vivo restimulation with pepti<strong>de</strong>-pulsed splenocytes. This<br />

resulted in a robust restimulation that led to a loss of t<strong>et</strong>ramer staining at this step. Our final<br />

protocol involved first performing the enrichment step, followed by the restimulation with<br />

pepti<strong>de</strong>-pulsed splenocytes for several hours before applying the established staining panels<br />

(Figure 20A, Protocol 2). Although we lost the positive t<strong>et</strong>ramer staining, we knew from the<br />

initial trial (Protocol 1) that IFNγ-positive cells are also t<strong>et</strong>ramer-positive cells and, in this<br />

way, we were able to investigate additional cytokines that are secr<strong>et</strong>ed by these cells.<br />

88

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!