Voie d'immunisation et séquence d'administration de l ... - TEL
Voie d'immunisation et séquence d'administration de l ... - TEL
Voie d'immunisation et séquence d'administration de l ... - TEL
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
tel-00827710, version 1 - 29 May 2013<br />
population observed in the pre-enrichment fraction (Obar <strong>et</strong> al., 2008). By contrast, the<br />
t<strong>et</strong>ramer-positive cell population represents a substantial number of cells following<br />
enrichment (Figure 19B).<br />
B. Combination with intracellular staining<br />
The t<strong>et</strong>ramer-based enrichment strategy allowed us to d<strong>et</strong>ect antigen-specific T cells,<br />
enumerate them and characterize them phenotypically by looking at surface marker<br />
expression. However, we were not able to obtain any information about the functionality of<br />
these cells. To address this, we <strong>de</strong>veloped a protocol that combined the t<strong>et</strong>ramer-based<br />
enrichment with intracellular staining (Figure 20). Unfortunately, several technical hurdles<br />
became immediately apparent, most importantly that these cells nee<strong>de</strong>d restimulation in or<strong>de</strong>r<br />
to secr<strong>et</strong>e cytokines; however, this restimulation also appeared to induce TCR<br />
downregulation, inhibiting enrichment with t<strong>et</strong>ramers.<br />
In or<strong>de</strong>r to find a solution to this problem, we initially <strong>de</strong>veloped a protocol using in vivo<br />
restimulation of the cells. Three hours prior to organ harvest, mice were injected with CpG<br />
formulated with DOTAP combined with SIINFEKL pepti<strong>de</strong>. After the restimulation period<br />
and harvest, we performed t<strong>et</strong>ramer-based enrichment as previously <strong>de</strong>scribed, followed by an<br />
intracellular staining (Figure 20A, Protocol 1). In vivo, the restimulation effect was strong<br />
enough to allow for the observation of<br />
IFNγ production in, and t<strong>et</strong>ramer-positive cells at the same time (Figure 20B).<br />
Non<strong>et</strong>heless, when we attempted to examine the production of other cytokines, we were not<br />
able to d<strong>et</strong>ect a signal, perhaps due to the lower extent of restimulation in vivo. We tried again<br />
to optimize a protocol with ex vivo restimulation with pepti<strong>de</strong>-pulsed splenocytes. This<br />
resulted in a robust restimulation that led to a loss of t<strong>et</strong>ramer staining at this step. Our final<br />
protocol involved first performing the enrichment step, followed by the restimulation with<br />
pepti<strong>de</strong>-pulsed splenocytes for several hours before applying the established staining panels<br />
(Figure 20A, Protocol 2). Although we lost the positive t<strong>et</strong>ramer staining, we knew from the<br />
initial trial (Protocol 1) that IFNγ-positive cells are also t<strong>et</strong>ramer-positive cells and, in this<br />
way, we were able to investigate additional cytokines that are secr<strong>et</strong>ed by these cells.<br />
88