27.06.2013 Views

Voie d'immunisation et séquence d'administration de l ... - TEL

Voie d'immunisation et séquence d'administration de l ... - TEL

Voie d'immunisation et séquence d'administration de l ... - TEL

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

tel-00827710, version 1 - 29 May 2013<br />

a limited amount of transgenic cells must be transferred in or<strong>de</strong>r to interpr<strong>et</strong> the data as a<br />

mimic of the endogenous repertoire.<br />

2) Recent improvement: t<strong>et</strong>ramer-based enrichment<br />

To overcome the problem of the low T cell frequency for a given specificity in the<br />

endogenous repertoire, Moon and colleagues <strong>de</strong>veloped a new technique using t<strong>et</strong>ramer-based<br />

enrichment to d<strong>et</strong>ect rare CD4 + T cells of a given specificity (Moon <strong>et</strong> al., 2007). To use this<br />

technique, the cells are first stained with MHC-I-pepti<strong>de</strong> t<strong>et</strong>ramers and then enriched, using<br />

magn<strong>et</strong>ic beads. In this way, it is possible to enrich t<strong>et</strong>ramer-positive T cells more than 100-<br />

fold. This strategy successfully managed to d<strong>et</strong>ect antigen-specific T cells in a naïve mouse<br />

and has been adapted and optimized for the study of CD8 + T cells in vivo (Obar <strong>et</strong> al., 2008).<br />

B. Conditions of immunization<br />

As briefly introduced previously, the outcome of a T cell response may be regulated by the<br />

conditions of immunization. The characteristics of the antigen, the administration m<strong>et</strong>hods,<br />

and the inflammatory context in which the injection is performed are all param<strong>et</strong>ers that could<br />

modify the T cell response. These potential points of variation should be anticipated and<br />

carefully consi<strong>de</strong>red when <strong>de</strong>veloping an experimental system in or<strong>de</strong>r to be as close as<br />

possible to the physiologic and clinical conditions one is attempting to mo<strong>de</strong>l.<br />

1) Antigen form and dose<br />

As <strong>de</strong>scribed previously, different forms of antigen are used in vaccinology, as well as in<br />

experimental animal mo<strong>de</strong>ls. The time nee<strong>de</strong>d to elicit an effector T cell response upon<br />

antigen injection <strong>de</strong>pends on several factors including the nature of antigen and/or the context<br />

of immunization. For instance, antigen presentation occurs rapidly after the injection of 8-10<br />

mer pepti<strong>de</strong> vaccines because processing is not required. On the contrary, there is a<br />

consi<strong>de</strong>rably longer <strong>de</strong>lay when injecting a cell-associated antigen that has to be<br />

phagocytosed and processed prior to presentation. Moreover, it is possible to targ<strong>et</strong> vaccines<br />

to different DC subs<strong>et</strong>s by complexing the antigen with specific antibodies such as DEC-205,<br />

the administration of the vaccine in a specific location, or via its expression as part of viral<br />

vectors that infects a particular cell type of interest. Knowing that DC subs<strong>et</strong>s have different<br />

abilities to present antigen on MHC-I or –II and, as a result, trigger various T cell or B cell<br />

responses, the choices of antigen form and <strong>de</strong>livery technique/location are of major<br />

74

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!