27.06.2013 Views

Voie d'immunisation et séquence d'administration de l ... - TEL

Voie d'immunisation et séquence d'administration de l ... - TEL

Voie d'immunisation et séquence d'administration de l ... - TEL

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

tel-00827710, version 1 - 29 May 2013<br />

1) Current techniques<br />

(a) Limiting dilutions analysis<br />

For many years, limiting dilution analysis was the standard m<strong>et</strong>hod used to d<strong>et</strong>ermine the<br />

frequency of antigen-specific T cells in a particular mo<strong>de</strong>l. The main limitations of this<br />

approach were the requirement for exogenous stimulation and expansion, which introduced<br />

potential bias and significant inter-assay variability.<br />

(b) T<strong>et</strong>ramer staining<br />

The generation of MHC-I t<strong>et</strong>rameric complexes, originally <strong>de</strong>scribed by Altman and Davis,<br />

represents what has been proven to be a major technical advance for the study of the antigen-<br />

specific T cell responses (Altman <strong>et</strong> al., 1996). MHC t<strong>et</strong>ramers are reagents that carry 4 MHC<br />

class I-pepti<strong>de</strong> complexes and, thus, have the ability to interact with multiple TCRs at the<br />

surface of a single CD8 + T cell. Fluorescent labeling of t<strong>et</strong>ramers has allowed the<br />

i<strong>de</strong>ntification of antigen-specific T lymphocytes based on the avidity of their TCR. By<br />

combining this m<strong>et</strong>hod with other antibody-based staining protocols (surface markers or<br />

intracellular cytokines), it is now possible to phenotypically and functionally characterize the<br />

antigen-specific T cell response. Nevertheless, there remains one important technical<br />

limitation: the limit of d<strong>et</strong>ection is relatively high – for t<strong>et</strong>ramer staining, only one cell in 10 4<br />

can be observed, which does not permit the direct d<strong>et</strong>ection of rare antigen-specific<br />

populations such as circulating naïve antigen-specific T cells (Figure 13).<br />

(c) ELISPOT and intracellular staining<br />

Both ELISPOT and intracellular staining techniques allow the functional characterization of<br />

the T cell populations of interest. These assays are based on the ability of antigen-specific T<br />

cells to secr<strong>et</strong>e cytokines upon short, in vitro restimulation with cognate pepti<strong>de</strong>. Such<br />

approaches are capable of distinguishing lymphocytes possessing the capacity to secr<strong>et</strong>e a<br />

given cytokine at the time of the assay, indicating the extend of prior T cell priming; however<br />

this response corresponds only to a fraction of the antigen-specific population.<br />

72

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!