Voie d'immunisation et séquence d'administration de l ... - TEL

Voie d'immunisation et séquence d'administration de l ... - TEL Voie d'immunisation et séquence d'administration de l ... - TEL

tel.archives.ouvertes.fr
from tel.archives.ouvertes.fr More from this publisher
27.06.2013 Views

tel-00827710, version 1 - 29 May 2013 compared to other APC populations. Moreover, DCs also express high levels of costimulatory molecules and immunostimulatory cytokines upon activation that are required for an effective T cell response. Consequently many trials have been performed to investigate the capability of these cells to mount an anti-tumor immune response when given as a vaccine. Together, these studies have demonstrated that DCs pulsed with tumor antigens can induce a protective immunity in mouse models (Fuertes et al., 2011), and clinical trials are currently ongoing to evaluate the feasibility of multiple DC-based vaccines in humans (Palucka and Banchereau, 2012). The first human DC-based vaccine trials were performed using cDCs that have been isolated or expanded ex vivo and then loaded with the antigen of interest. DCs can either be loaded with the specific peptide or the protein, or they can be transfected with the nucleic acid encoding the specific epitope for presentation (Palucka et al., 2005). The prostate cancer DC- based vaccine, sipuleucel-T, is the only DC-based vaccine that has received the approval of the FDA. Sipuleucel-T is composed of autologous mononuclear cells cultured with a fusion protein containing a common prostate cancer antigen, the prostatic acid phosphatase (PAP), linked to GM-CSF (Higano et al., 2009). The main limitation of this approach is that the sequence of the antigen and the epitope must be well defined. Another approach without this caveat is to load DCs with dying cells or tumor lysates in order to promote an anti-tumor response based on the processing and presentation of unknown tumor antigens. In this case, the immunodominant epitope(s) is/are likely present but does not require detailed knowledge on the part of the investigator (Palucka et al., 2006). There are, however, limitations with this approach as well. First, the majority of DCs injected remains at the injection site upon administration and fail to migrate to the lymph node. This sequestration could result in DC dedifferentiation due to extended time in the injected site tissue microenvironment; a potential consequence of this is the induction of immune tolerance by these cells, rather than activation. Second, there is a concern that DCs are terminally differentiated cells. Consequently, they cannot be expanded to large numbers ex vivo and the life span of these cells upon injection is only about 24-48 hours. This limited time frame results in poor antigen delivery to the lymphoid tissue, where optimal T cell priming occurs. Several studies have been performed to address and, hopefully, circumvent these potential problems using strategies such as using different routes of vaccination and, in particular, the use of intranodal injection (Aarntzen et al., 2008). Multiple observations made during these studies have allowed for the optimization of DC-based vaccine development. It has been shown that upon uptake, the antigen must be transferred to endogenous DCs in order for the 58

tel-00827710, version 1 - 29 May 2013 vaccine to be efficient (Kleindienst and Brocker, 2003). Moreover, selective ablation of endogenous DCs or the injection of dying, loaded DCs, rather than live cells, are enough to abrogate the effects of a vaccine (Petersen et al., 2011). This indicates that the injected DCs have to migrate away from the injection site and transfer antigen to resident DCs to promote an efficient response. In parallel, knowledge about DC subsets has been expanded and improved. The murine resident CD8α + DC subset has been identified as the most competent for cross-presentation (den Haan et al., 2000). The human equivalent has recently been identified and characterized by its expression of the receptor Clec9A (Crozat et al., 2010; Poulin et al., 2010; Zhang et al., 2012). This subset is likely implicated in the engulfment of antigens that enter the lymphoid tissue, as well as antigen that may be transferred from peripheral, migratory DCs. From these data it made sense to enhance the delivery of antigen directly to the CD8α + DC subset, hoping that this strategy would help to avoid the problems of injecting ex vivo generated DCs. These antigens are targeted to the CD8α + DC subset via conjugation to antibodies specific of CD8α + DC surface receptors such as DEC-205 or DC- SIGN, both members of the C-type lectin receptor family (Bonifaz et al., 2002). This approach has great interest in the field of cancer vaccines, because it can be developed on a large scale. The existing limitation is that it must be combined with an adjuvant to trigger T cell priming (Bonifaz et al., 2004). (c) T cells used as cell-associated antigens Initially, because of their role in promoting an effective immune response, DCs appeared to be the best candidate for the development of a cellular vaccine. However it is possible that other cell types may be used as antigen delivery vehicles. Following interesting observations during a clinical study, T cells appeared to be a potential vehicle to deliver antigen in vivo. In this trial, during allogeneic bone marrow transplantation, lymphocytes were infused into patients. However, these cells had been genetically modified to express the herpes simplex virus thymidine kinase (HSV-TK) “suicide gene”, as a security mechanism in case of an autoreactive response against these transferred cells (Bonini et al., 1997). In this case, it was shown that patients developed anti-HSV-TK CD4 + and CD8 + T cell responses that promoted the elimination of the therapeutically transferred T cells; furthermore, memory T cells targeting HSV-TK were generated (Berger et al., 2006). Due to this unexpected response, T cells were then considered as a potential source of antigen. More than just an antigen delivery vehicle in the context of vaccination, T cells also have some advantages as compared to DCs: (i) these cells efficiently migrate to the lymphoid tissues allowing for the optimal localization of antigen for phagocytosis by resident DCs and induction of a T cell response; (ii) T cells can Page 59 of 256

tel-00827710, version 1 - 29 May 2013<br />

compared to other APC populations. Moreover, DCs also express high levels of costimulatory<br />

molecules and immunostimulatory cytokines upon activation that are required for an effective<br />

T cell response. Consequently many trials have been performed to investigate the capability<br />

of these cells to mount an anti-tumor immune response when given as a vaccine. Tog<strong>et</strong>her,<br />

these studies have <strong>de</strong>monstrated that DCs pulsed with tumor antigens can induce a protective<br />

immunity in mouse mo<strong>de</strong>ls (Fuertes <strong>et</strong> al., 2011), and clinical trials are currently ongoing to<br />

evaluate the feasibility of multiple DC-based vaccines in humans (Palucka and Banchereau,<br />

2012).<br />

The first human DC-based vaccine trials were performed using cDCs that have been isolated<br />

or expan<strong>de</strong>d ex vivo and then loa<strong>de</strong>d with the antigen of interest. DCs can either be loa<strong>de</strong>d<br />

with the specific pepti<strong>de</strong> or the protein, or they can be transfected with the nucleic acid<br />

encoding the specific epitope for presentation (Palucka <strong>et</strong> al., 2005). The prostate cancer DC-<br />

based vaccine, sipuleucel-T, is the only DC-based vaccine that has received the approval of<br />

the FDA. Sipuleucel-T is composed of autologous mononuclear cells cultured with a fusion<br />

protein containing a common prostate cancer antigen, the prostatic acid phosphatase (PAP),<br />

linked to GM-CSF (Higano <strong>et</strong> al., 2009). The main limitation of this approach is that the<br />

sequence of the antigen and the epitope must be well <strong>de</strong>fined. Another approach without this<br />

caveat is to load DCs with dying cells or tumor lysates in or<strong>de</strong>r to promote an anti-tumor<br />

response based on the processing and presentation of unknown tumor antigens. In this case,<br />

the immunodominant epitope(s) is/are likely present but does not require d<strong>et</strong>ailed knowledge<br />

on the part of the investigator (Palucka <strong>et</strong> al., 2006).<br />

There are, however, limitations with this approach as well. First, the majority of DCs injected<br />

remains at the injection site upon administration and fail to migrate to the lymph no<strong>de</strong>. This<br />

sequestration could result in DC <strong>de</strong>differentiation due to exten<strong>de</strong>d time in the injected site<br />

tissue microenvironment; a potential consequence of this is the induction of immune tolerance<br />

by these cells, rather than activation. Second, there is a concern that DCs are terminally<br />

differentiated cells. Consequently, they cannot be expan<strong>de</strong>d to large numbers ex vivo and the<br />

life span of these cells upon injection is only about 24-48 hours. This limited time frame<br />

results in poor antigen <strong>de</strong>livery to the lymphoid tissue, where optimal T cell priming occurs.<br />

Several studies have been performed to address and, hopefully, circumvent these potential<br />

problems using strategies such as using different routes of vaccination and, in particular, the<br />

use of intranodal injection (Aarntzen <strong>et</strong> al., 2008). Multiple observations ma<strong>de</strong> during these<br />

studies have allowed for the optimization of DC-based vaccine <strong>de</strong>velopment. It has been<br />

shown that upon uptake, the antigen must be transferred to endogenous DCs in or<strong>de</strong>r for the<br />

58

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!