27.06.2013 Views

Voie d'immunisation et séquence d'administration de l ... - TEL

Voie d'immunisation et séquence d'administration de l ... - TEL

Voie d'immunisation et séquence d'administration de l ... - TEL

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

tel-00827710, version 1 - 29 May 2013<br />

will direct antigen to various intracellular compartments or sequences coding for<br />

immunomodulatory molecules can be ad<strong>de</strong>d to these vaccines. The main limitation of this<br />

approach is the inefficiency of the vaccine <strong>de</strong>livery m<strong>et</strong>hod. Intramuscular injections such as<br />

those optimized for DNA vaccine <strong>de</strong>livery in mice did not show the same efficiency in<br />

humans, perhaps due to the different volume used for injection. Viral vectors have been tested<br />

for their efficiency as DNA vaccine <strong>de</strong>livery systems with b<strong>et</strong>ter success, but reactivity<br />

against the vector itself limited their efficacy overall. An electroporation m<strong>et</strong>hod seems<br />

promising thus far, as it has been shown to enhance antigen expression upon intramuscular<br />

injection (Ahlen <strong>et</strong> al., 2007).<br />

Despite similar limitations concerning their <strong>de</strong>livery, RNA vaccines have also been tested. It<br />

was observed that mRNA injection into the muscle induces protein expression in mice (Wolff<br />

<strong>et</strong> al., 1990). Additionally, it was <strong>de</strong>monstrated that intra<strong>de</strong>rmal injection of antigen-encoding<br />

RNA, tog<strong>et</strong>her with an adjuvant, had a positive impact on the anti-tumor immune response<br />

(Wei<strong>de</strong> <strong>et</strong> al., 2009). In or<strong>de</strong>r to optimize injection procedures, stabilization of RNA with<br />

protamine has been used to protect the molecule from RNases and promote persistence.<br />

Similar to DNA transfection, following mRNA injection, transfected cells are engulfed by<br />

DCs that cross-present antigen, unless the DCs themselves were directly transfected.<br />

Interestingly, Fotin-Mleczek and colleagues combined the same mRNAs in two different<br />

forms to induce a potent immune response in a mouse mo<strong>de</strong>l of tumor vaccination: a non-<br />

complexed free RNA known to have a high translation efficiency and a stabilized protamine-<br />

complexed mRNA, which stimulated TLR7 (Fotin-Mleczek <strong>et</strong> al., 2011). This combination<br />

triggered a humoral and cellular response and allowed the immune system to mount a<br />

response <strong>de</strong>spite the tumor-induced immune suppression.<br />

3) Cell-based vaccines<br />

Cellular vaccines have also been <strong>de</strong>veloped in the context of cancer immunotherapy. The<br />

overall aim of cancer vaccines is to induce an anti-tumor CD8 + T cell response against the<br />

TAAs. Several cell-based strategies have been tested to achieve that goal, including using the<br />

tumor cells directly as a source of antigen, or injecting DCs that have been previously loa<strong>de</strong>d<br />

with the tumor antigen of interest. Additionally, other cell types have been examined for their<br />

feasibility as antigen <strong>de</strong>livery vehicles.<br />

(a) Whole tumor-cell vaccines<br />

The main benefit of using tumor cells as a source of antigen is that it does not require d<strong>et</strong>ailed<br />

prior knowledge of the immunodominant antigen responsible for promoting a protective<br />

56

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!