Voie d'immunisation et séquence d'administration de l ... - TEL
Voie d'immunisation et séquence d'administration de l ... - TEL
Voie d'immunisation et séquence d'administration de l ... - TEL
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
tel-00827710, version 1 - 29 May 2013<br />
will direct antigen to various intracellular compartments or sequences coding for<br />
immunomodulatory molecules can be ad<strong>de</strong>d to these vaccines. The main limitation of this<br />
approach is the inefficiency of the vaccine <strong>de</strong>livery m<strong>et</strong>hod. Intramuscular injections such as<br />
those optimized for DNA vaccine <strong>de</strong>livery in mice did not show the same efficiency in<br />
humans, perhaps due to the different volume used for injection. Viral vectors have been tested<br />
for their efficiency as DNA vaccine <strong>de</strong>livery systems with b<strong>et</strong>ter success, but reactivity<br />
against the vector itself limited their efficacy overall. An electroporation m<strong>et</strong>hod seems<br />
promising thus far, as it has been shown to enhance antigen expression upon intramuscular<br />
injection (Ahlen <strong>et</strong> al., 2007).<br />
Despite similar limitations concerning their <strong>de</strong>livery, RNA vaccines have also been tested. It<br />
was observed that mRNA injection into the muscle induces protein expression in mice (Wolff<br />
<strong>et</strong> al., 1990). Additionally, it was <strong>de</strong>monstrated that intra<strong>de</strong>rmal injection of antigen-encoding<br />
RNA, tog<strong>et</strong>her with an adjuvant, had a positive impact on the anti-tumor immune response<br />
(Wei<strong>de</strong> <strong>et</strong> al., 2009). In or<strong>de</strong>r to optimize injection procedures, stabilization of RNA with<br />
protamine has been used to protect the molecule from RNases and promote persistence.<br />
Similar to DNA transfection, following mRNA injection, transfected cells are engulfed by<br />
DCs that cross-present antigen, unless the DCs themselves were directly transfected.<br />
Interestingly, Fotin-Mleczek and colleagues combined the same mRNAs in two different<br />
forms to induce a potent immune response in a mouse mo<strong>de</strong>l of tumor vaccination: a non-<br />
complexed free RNA known to have a high translation efficiency and a stabilized protamine-<br />
complexed mRNA, which stimulated TLR7 (Fotin-Mleczek <strong>et</strong> al., 2011). This combination<br />
triggered a humoral and cellular response and allowed the immune system to mount a<br />
response <strong>de</strong>spite the tumor-induced immune suppression.<br />
3) Cell-based vaccines<br />
Cellular vaccines have also been <strong>de</strong>veloped in the context of cancer immunotherapy. The<br />
overall aim of cancer vaccines is to induce an anti-tumor CD8 + T cell response against the<br />
TAAs. Several cell-based strategies have been tested to achieve that goal, including using the<br />
tumor cells directly as a source of antigen, or injecting DCs that have been previously loa<strong>de</strong>d<br />
with the tumor antigen of interest. Additionally, other cell types have been examined for their<br />
feasibility as antigen <strong>de</strong>livery vehicles.<br />
(a) Whole tumor-cell vaccines<br />
The main benefit of using tumor cells as a source of antigen is that it does not require d<strong>et</strong>ailed<br />
prior knowledge of the immunodominant antigen responsible for promoting a protective<br />
56