Voie d'immunisation et séquence d'administration de l ... - TEL

Voie d'immunisation et séquence d'administration de l ... - TEL Voie d'immunisation et séquence d'administration de l ... - TEL

tel.archives.ouvertes.fr
from tel.archives.ouvertes.fr More from this publisher
27.06.2013 Views

tel-00827710, version 1 - 29 May 2013 Each of these PRRs may allow for the distinction between “self” and “non-self” by the recognition of specialized microbial components. However, in 1994, Polly Matzinger proposed “the danger model”, another theory that describes the signals that activate APCs and explains how and when the immune system decides to mount an inflammatory response (Matzinger, 1994). In Matzinger’s model, the immune system would be more concerned with damage than foreigness and, as a result, would be more activated by alarm signals from injured tissues than by the recognition of non-self components. Both Janeway’s and Matzinger’s models assume that APCs can be activated by signals from their environment but Janeway restricted these signals to the detection of PAMPs, whereas Matzinger hypothesized the involvement of more general danger signals, both exogenous molecules from pathogens, or endogenous signals released from injured tissues of the host. For instance, danger signals can be molecules derived from a pathogen (PAMP) but also RNA, heat shock proteins, hydrophobic molecules or components of the extracellular matrix. Under normal conditions, these components are not detectable by the immune system but after damage they can be released in the microenvironment and activate immune cells. (b) Damage-Associated Molecular Patterns (DAMPs) In 1999, Gallucci and colleagues demonstrated that DCs can be activated by mechanical stimulation without the addition of any exogenous molecules (Gallucci et al., 1999). Concurrently, necrosis was described as a cell death mechanism producing generally more danger signals than apoptosis, which was considered as a controlled and less damage-signal inducing form of cell death. Thus began the field of investigation into Damage-Associated Molecular Patterns (DAMPs) (Chen and Nunez, 2010) (Table 3). Among the first molecular damage signals described were heat-shock proteins, which were shown to activate dendritic cells when they were released from dying cells (Basu et al., 2000). The DNA-binding protein High-Mobility Group Box 1 protein (HMGB1) was also discovered to be an important mediator of damage signaling, since it induces inflammation. Furthermore, it is involved in the differential damage signaling activities of necrotic versus apopotic cells. Other molecules such as extracellular ATP or uric acid have also been shown to be released after injury and have the ability to activate the immune system. Interestingly, some of these DAMPs can also be detected by PRRs such as TLRs (Ohashi et al., 2000). Another pathway discovered only recently, the inflammasome, acts as a molecular platform capable of converging danger stimuli including both PAMPs and DAMPs (Schroder and Tschopp, 2010). The activation of this complex triggers the release of inflammatory cytokines such as IL-1β and IL-18. 34

tel-00827710, version 1 - 29 May 2013 Table 3. Diversity of DAMPs. ECM, extracellular matrix. B. Characteristics of the different subsets of dendritic cells 1) Heterogeneity of DCs Phenotypically and functionally, all DCs are not equal. Different DC subsets have been described based on their surface marker expression profile, tissue localization and specialization in antigen presentation (Table 4). The first distinction can be made between conventional DC (cDCs) and plasmacytoid DC (pDCs) populations that can be observed and Page 35 of 256

tel-00827710, version 1 - 29 May 2013<br />

Each of these PRRs may allow for the distinction b<strong>et</strong>ween “self” and “non-self” by the<br />

recognition of specialized microbial components. However, in 1994, Polly Matzinger<br />

proposed “the danger mo<strong>de</strong>l”, another theory that <strong>de</strong>scribes the signals that activate APCs<br />

and explains how and when the immune system <strong>de</strong>ci<strong>de</strong>s to mount an inflammatory response<br />

(Matzinger, 1994). In Matzinger’s mo<strong>de</strong>l, the immune system would be more concerned with<br />

damage than foreigness and, as a result, would be more activated by alarm signals from<br />

injured tissues than by the recognition of non-self components. Both Janeway’s and<br />

Matzinger’s mo<strong>de</strong>ls assume that APCs can be activated by signals from their environment but<br />

Janeway restricted these signals to the d<strong>et</strong>ection of PAMPs, whereas Matzinger hypothesized<br />

the involvement of more general danger signals, both exogenous molecules from pathogens,<br />

or endogenous signals released from injured tissues of the host. For instance, danger signals<br />

can be molecules <strong>de</strong>rived from a pathogen (PAMP) but also RNA, heat shock proteins,<br />

hydrophobic molecules or components of the extracellular matrix. Un<strong>de</strong>r normal conditions,<br />

these components are not d<strong>et</strong>ectable by the immune system but after damage they can be<br />

released in the microenvironment and activate immune cells.<br />

(b) Damage-Associated Molecular Patterns (DAMPs)<br />

In 1999, Gallucci and colleagues <strong>de</strong>monstrated that DCs can be activated by mechanical<br />

stimulation without the addition of any exogenous molecules (Gallucci <strong>et</strong> al., 1999).<br />

Concurrently, necrosis was <strong>de</strong>scribed as a cell <strong>de</strong>ath mechanism producing generally more<br />

danger signals than apoptosis, which was consi<strong>de</strong>red as a controlled and less damage-signal<br />

inducing form of cell <strong>de</strong>ath. Thus began the field of investigation into Damage-Associated<br />

Molecular Patterns (DAMPs) (Chen and Nunez, 2010) (Table 3). Among the first molecular<br />

damage signals <strong>de</strong>scribed were heat-shock proteins, which were shown to activate <strong>de</strong>ndritic<br />

cells when they were released from dying cells (Basu <strong>et</strong> al., 2000). The DNA-binding protein<br />

High-Mobility Group Box 1 protein (HMGB1) was also discovered to be an important<br />

mediator of damage signaling, since it induces inflammation. Furthermore, it is involved in<br />

the differential damage signaling activities of necrotic versus apopotic cells. Other molecules<br />

such as extracellular ATP or uric acid have also been shown to be released after injury and<br />

have the ability to activate the immune system. Interestingly, some of these DAMPs can also<br />

be d<strong>et</strong>ected by PRRs such as TLRs (Ohashi <strong>et</strong> al., 2000). Another pathway discovered only<br />

recently, the inflammasome, acts as a molecular platform capable of converging danger<br />

stimuli including both PAMPs and DAMPs (Schro<strong>de</strong>r and Tschopp, 2010). The activation of<br />

this complex triggers the release of inflammatory cytokines such as IL-1β and IL-18.<br />

34

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!