27.06.2013 Views

Voie d'immunisation et séquence d'administration de l ... - TEL

Voie d'immunisation et séquence d'administration de l ... - TEL

Voie d'immunisation et séquence d'administration de l ... - TEL

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

tel-00827710, version 1 - 29 May 2013<br />

have a boosting effect, due to the <strong>de</strong>sensitization of certain cell types to IFNα (Francois-<br />

Newton <strong>et</strong> al., 2011). This <strong>de</strong>sensitization may explain why imiquimod did not improve the<br />

efficiency of the vaccine during the trial period.<br />

4) Combination of several approaches: example of cancer treatments<br />

In the previous section we discussed the combination b<strong>et</strong>ween antigen and adjuvant as a<br />

single therapy. Now we will consi<strong>de</strong>r the combination b<strong>et</strong>ween more than two different<br />

reagents as they may be combined and used in the treatment of cancer. Several approaches<br />

have been <strong>de</strong>veloped in or<strong>de</strong>r to further un<strong>de</strong>rstand the mechanisms of tumor growth, the anti-<br />

tumor response and the <strong>de</strong>velopment of therapies to enhance tumor clearance. First, the tumor<br />

can be targ<strong>et</strong>ed, either for killing or for modifications that might ren<strong>de</strong>r it more immunogenic.<br />

Secondly, the immune system could be boosted against specific TAAs in or<strong>de</strong>r to obtain an<br />

efficient response even if the initial stimulation by tumor antigens was suboptimal. Finally,<br />

the immunosuppressive environment created by the tumor could be altered such that the<br />

<strong>de</strong>velopment of an effective inflammatory response was allowed (Lesterhuis <strong>et</strong> al., 2011).<br />

(a) Treatments targ<strong>et</strong>ing directly tumor cells<br />

Initial chemotherapy treatments targ<strong>et</strong>ing tumors involved the use of broadly acting<br />

compounds that induced the rapid <strong>de</strong>ath of dividing cells. With time, the signaling pathways<br />

involved in cell survival and tumor growth were i<strong>de</strong>ntified and more specific agents blocking<br />

unique steps in these pathways were <strong>de</strong>veloped to stop tumor progression and promote tumor<br />

cell <strong>de</strong>ath. This approach was minimally successful, <strong>de</strong>monstrating some progress in inducing<br />

tumor regression, but resistance mechanisms often <strong>de</strong>veloped and the treatment benefits did<br />

not extend to long-term survival (Vanneman and Dranoff, 2012). However, these treatments<br />

are interesting for further study because they induced <strong>de</strong>ath in at least a fraction of tumor<br />

cells, facilitating the effect of cytotoxic T cells. These types of treatments also trigger the<br />

release of dying cell <strong>de</strong>bris and danger signals that can be taken up by DCs, such as ATP or<br />

HMGB1 that will result in immune cell activation.<br />

(b) Development of an efficient anti-tumor immune response<br />

Another approach to fight cancer is to boost the immune response in or<strong>de</strong>r to ren<strong>de</strong>r it more<br />

efficient against specific tumor antigens. As discussed previously, different types of antigen<br />

can be used for vaccination (Table 5). The aim is to use a more immunogenic antigen in or<strong>de</strong>r<br />

to mount an effective T cell response directed against tumor. Drugs modulating the steps of<br />

immune response could be combined with the vaccine treatment to obtain the most efficient T<br />

172

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!