27.06.2013 Views

Voie d'immunisation et séquence d'administration de l ... - TEL

Voie d'immunisation et séquence d'administration de l ... - TEL

Voie d'immunisation et séquence d'administration de l ... - TEL

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

tel-00827710, version 1 - 29 May 2013<br />

of monocytes into DCs with varying phenotypes and functions. Activation of monocytes with<br />

IL-4, IFNα, TNF or IL-15 gave rise to different populations of DCs with diverse phenotypes.<br />

That could explain the different efficiencies of these cells in mounting CD8 + T cell responses<br />

(Paqu<strong>et</strong>te <strong>et</strong> al., 1998; Dubsky <strong>et</strong> al., 2007).<br />

(b) Si<strong>de</strong> effects of type I IFN treatment on DCs<br />

Not all type I IFN effects on DCs promote a well-regulated immune response. Autoimmune<br />

disor<strong>de</strong>rs have been observed in melanoma patients un<strong>de</strong>rgoing treatment with type I IFN.<br />

One hypothesis is that IFN induced in vivo maturation of DCs that have taken up self-antigen<br />

and this led to an autoimmune response (Rizza <strong>et</strong> al., 2010).<br />

(c) Targ<strong>et</strong>ing DCs with specific antigens<br />

It was previously introduced that the type of antigen and thus the type of receptor implicated<br />

for antigen uptake plays a role in the efficiency of the subsequent immune response. One<br />

promising approach for vaccination <strong>de</strong>velopment is to targ<strong>et</strong> antigens to a specific subs<strong>et</strong> of<br />

DCs by coupling them with antibodies directed against DC-specific cell-surface molecules.<br />

The CD8α + DC subs<strong>et</strong> has been the most studied thus far, due to its specialization for cross-<br />

priming. Antibodies coupled to Ovalbumin and targ<strong>et</strong>ing different receptors, DEC-205,<br />

Clec9A and Clec12A were tested. Interestingly it was observed that the outcome of the<br />

response and the requirement for adjuvant <strong>de</strong>pends on which receptor was targ<strong>et</strong>ed. DEC-205<br />

and Clec9A are effective targ<strong>et</strong>s to promote cytotoxic T cell responses, while Clec12A was<br />

shown to be inefficient (Lahoud <strong>et</strong> al., 2011). Addition of adjuvant is always required to<br />

induce a CD8 + T cell response. In contrast, a potent humoral response can be obtained upon<br />

targ<strong>et</strong>ing of antigen to Clec9A in the absence of adjuvant (Figure 56). Since Clec9A<br />

expression is restricted to CD8α + DCs and pDCs, this observation may be due to a longer<br />

persistence of antigen coupled to antibody in the blood because fewer cells are available that<br />

can endocytosed it, allowing for a sustained presentation on MHC-II.<br />

170

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!