Voie d'immunisation et séquence d'administration de l ... - TEL

Voie d'immunisation et séquence d'administration de l ... - TEL Voie d'immunisation et séquence d'administration de l ... - TEL

tel.archives.ouvertes.fr
from tel.archives.ouvertes.fr More from this publisher
27.06.2013 Views

tel-00827710, version 1 - 29 May 2013 irradiated cells alone (McBride et al., 2006). One explanation may be that when dsRNA is associated with the antigen, it can be sensed by DCs simultaneously with antigen uptake and this process ensures optimal adjuvant action. In contrast, when irradiated cells were injected s.c. with soluble poly I:C, the dsRNA adjuvant might have disseminated faster than cells and was detected first by DCs. Similarly, it was demonstrated that CpG-conjugated apoptotic tumor cells induce a better anti-tumor response than the same cells formulated with free CpG (Shirota and Klinman, 2011). The authors hypothesize that direct conjugation of antigen with CpG enhances antigen uptake through DNA receptors, but it may also ensure that DC does not sense soluble CpG prior to antigen. Generally, Blander and Sander point out in a recent review that the detection of PAMPs, either soluble or linked to a pathogen, influences the development of the subsequent response (Blander and Sander, 2012). Most studies reviewed had been performed with soluble PAMPs that could be found at a distance from the site of infection, while detection of PAMPs linked to a pathogen is a direct sign of local pathogen presence that requires a microbicidal response. They suggested that phagocytosis of the pathogen must occurr in parallel of PAMP sensing in order to activate the appropriate response. This explanation could also explain the results of the previous two studies described. When TLR ligands are free, it is sensed but there is not associated antigen and, therefore, no need for an active immune response. To conclude for cell-associated antigen, we propose that (Table 6): - Either the antigen is physically linked to the adjuvant, allowing a simultaneous detection of both by DCs. - Or, the adjuvant is free, and must be delivered with a delay after immunization in order to ensure antigen uptake prior to adjuvant sensing by DCs. 164

tel-00827710, version 1 - 29 May 2013 Table 6. Combination of antigen with adjuvant. Compiled from our data and previous studies, we predict the optimal timing for adjuvant delivery. 5) Conclusion Together, these results highlight the need for an increased and deeper understanding of the mechanisms of antigen uptake, processing and presentation in order to adapt the timing for optimal adjuvant delivery. Each form of antigen likely requires a different adjuvant delivery schedule. Cell-associated antigen requires the longest time between immunization and presentation, and therefore a delay should be considered when deciding upon an adjuvant delivery schedule. Although the presentation requires the same processing as cell-associated antigen, vaccination with a soluble protein antigen that disseminates quickly will result in a more rapide presentation and reduce the overall duration of the process. Consequently, the optimal timing for adjuvant administration will be closer to the initial timing of immunization. Finally, vaccination with a peptide, that directly interacts with the MHC molecules triggers a rapid presentation, and, therefore, we propose that co-administration with adjuvant would provide the optimal effect. To conclude, we propose that antigen needs to be detected and taken up at the same time as adjuvant is sensed, but not necessarily co-administered. Most importantly, depending on the time required for antigen to be disseminated, processed and detected, the timing of adjuvant delivery must be adjusted in order to obtain optimal boosting of the subsequent immune response. Page 165 of 256

tel-00827710, version 1 - 29 May 2013<br />

Table 6. Combination of antigen with adjuvant. Compiled from our data and previous studies, we<br />

predict the optimal timing for adjuvant <strong>de</strong>livery.<br />

5) Conclusion<br />

Tog<strong>et</strong>her, these results highlight the need for an increased and <strong>de</strong>eper un<strong>de</strong>rstanding of the<br />

mechanisms of antigen uptake, processing and presentation in or<strong>de</strong>r to adapt the timing for<br />

optimal adjuvant <strong>de</strong>livery. Each form of antigen likely requires a different adjuvant <strong>de</strong>livery<br />

schedule. Cell-associated antigen requires the longest time b<strong>et</strong>ween immunization and<br />

presentation, and therefore a <strong>de</strong>lay should be consi<strong>de</strong>red when <strong>de</strong>ciding upon an adjuvant<br />

<strong>de</strong>livery schedule. Although the presentation requires the same processing as cell-associated<br />

antigen, vaccination with a soluble protein antigen that disseminates quickly will result in a<br />

more rapi<strong>de</strong> presentation and reduce the overall duration of the process. Consequently, the<br />

optimal timing for adjuvant administration will be closer to the initial timing of<br />

immunization. Finally, vaccination with a pepti<strong>de</strong>, that directly interacts with the MHC<br />

molecules triggers a rapid presentation, and, therefore, we propose that co-administration with<br />

adjuvant would provi<strong>de</strong> the optimal effect.<br />

To conclu<strong>de</strong>, we propose that antigen needs to be d<strong>et</strong>ected and taken up at the same time as<br />

adjuvant is sensed, but not necessarily co-administered. Most importantly, <strong>de</strong>pending on the<br />

time required for antigen to be disseminated, processed and d<strong>et</strong>ected, the timing of adjuvant<br />

<strong>de</strong>livery must be adjusted in or<strong>de</strong>r to obtain optimal boosting of the subsequent immune<br />

response.<br />

Page 165 of 256

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!