27.06.2013 Views

Voie d'immunisation et séquence d'administration de l ... - TEL

Voie d'immunisation et séquence d'administration de l ... - TEL

Voie d'immunisation et séquence d'administration de l ... - TEL

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

tel-00827710, version 1 - 29 May 2013<br />

Figure 50. The differential effects of adjuvant impact protection against Listeria. Mice were<br />

immunized i.d. with 5x10 5 K bm1 mOva splenocytes. Poly I:C was administered either the day of<br />

immunization or 3 days later. On day 9 post-immunization, mice were challenged with 5x10 5 CFU of<br />

Ova-expressing Listeria. Two days later, the spleen (A) and the liver (B) were harvested and bacterial<br />

load per organ was d<strong>et</strong>ermined. NI, non-immunized mice. Dotted lines correspond to median CFU in<br />

the absence of poly I:C. Mann-Whitney test p-values were calculated, comparing immunization<br />

condition to the NI control.<br />

In this chapter, we have <strong>de</strong>monstrated that the optimal timing for adjuvant <strong>de</strong>livery is<br />

critically <strong>de</strong>pen<strong>de</strong>nt on the route of immunization. Our data strongly suggest that this effect is<br />

due to the different kin<strong>et</strong>ics of antigen uptake and presentation upon i.d. or i.v. antigen<br />

<strong>de</strong>livery. Specifically, the timing of antigen capture and T cell engagement has a profound<br />

impact on the appropriate timing for adjuvant treatment. For optimal vaccination, there is<br />

interest and need to optimize the coordination b<strong>et</strong>ween innate and adaptive immune<br />

responses; our data suggest that a careful optimization of adjuvant and antigen administration<br />

will be required.<br />

Page 133 of 256

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!