Voie d'immunisation et séquence d'administration de l ... - TEL
Voie d'immunisation et séquence d'administration de l ... - TEL Voie d'immunisation et séquence d'administration de l ... - TEL
tel-00827710, version 1 - 29 May 2013 Figure 46. Enhancement of cross-priming upon late poly I:C delivery is type I IFN-dependent. WT, IFNAR -/- and IRF3/7DKO mice were immunized i.d. with 5x10 5 K bm1 mOva splenocytes. Three days later, 100µg of poly I:C was administered. On day 10, the spleen and the draining lymph node were harvested and pooled. CD8 + T cells were purified to perform an IFNγ-Elispot. SFC, Spot forming cell. 2) Late type I IFN enhance cross-priming at the level of antigen uptake and/or presentation As we observed that type I IFN are responsible for the enhancement of the response, we were interested in dissecting the mechanisms of this phenomenon and, in particular, determining the targets of these cytokines. CD45.1/2 WT and CD45.2/2 IFNAR -/- OT-I were transferred into CD45.1/1 WT recipients. These mice were then immunized with K bm1 mOva splenocytes and injected with poly I:C three days later. Seven days post-immunization, OT-I cells were enriched with an anti-CD45.2 antibody for further characterization (Figure 47A). We observed that the percentage of IFNγ-producing cells increased upon poly I:C treatment in WT as well as in IFNAR -/- OT-I populations (Figure 47B). Similar increases in expression were obtained by comparing the MFI of the IFNγ signal in the two populations (Figure 47C). Of note, IL-2 and TNFα production by these cells was also evaluated (data not shown). No clear differences were observed for these cytokines either - the cells producing the highest amount of IFNγ were able to secrete IL-2 and TNFα. From these data, we concluded that type I IFN act at the level of antigen uptake and/or presentation. However we also observed that the basal levels and the magnitude of the increase was not the same between WT and IFNAR - /- populations. Consequently, it is possible that these differences could be explained by the direct action of type I IFN on T cells. 128
tel-00827710, version 1 - 29 May 2013 Figure 47. Type I IFN enhance T cell cross-priming at the level of cross-presentation. 5x10 3 CD45.1/2 WT OT-I and 5x10 3 CD45.2/2 IFNAR -/- OT-I were transferred into WT CD45.1/1 recipients. The following day, mice were immunized i.d. with 5x10 5 K bm1 mOva splenocytes. They received 100µg of poly I:C on day 3. On day 7, enrichment was performed using a CD45.2 antibody to detect the 2 populations of OT-I. After ex vivo restimulation, IFNγ intracellular staining was performed. (A) Representative FACS plots are depicted (live DUMP - CD3 + CD8 + CD45.2 + cells are shown) with the gates corresponding to IFNAR -/- OT-I and WT OT-I producing IFNγ (red and green gate respectively). The numbers correspond to the percentage of OT-I in each of the gates. The percentages of IFNγ-producing OT-I (B) as well as the geometric fluorescent mean for IFNγ (C) are reported. 3) Does late type I IFN act directly on antigen-specific CD8 + T cells? The same experimental approach was then taken using IFNAR -/- rather than WT recipients. WT and IFNAR -/- OT-I cells were transferred, mice were immunized and received poly I:C on day 3. Only WT OT-I cells were able to respond to type I IFN in these mice. An increase in the percentage of IFNγ−producing cells (Figure 48A) or in the MFI (Figure 48B) for IFNAR - /- OT-I cells was not observed. In the case of WT OT-I cells, there was only a slight increase in the MFI, but overall there was not substantial difference based on poly I:C treatment. Moreover we observed a strong basal level of IFNγ signal in the WT OT-I cells (Figure 48B). Page 129 of 256
- Page 77 and 78: tel-00827710, version 1 - 29 May 20
- Page 79 and 80: tel-00827710, version 1 - 29 May 20
- Page 81 and 82: tel-00827710, version 1 - 29 May 20
- Page 83 and 84: tel-00827710, version 1 - 29 May 20
- Page 85 and 86: tel-00827710, version 1 - 29 May 20
- Page 87 and 88: tel-00827710, version 1 - 29 May 20
- Page 89 and 90: tel-00827710, version 1 - 29 May 20
- Page 91 and 92: tel-00827710, version 1 - 29 May 20
- Page 93 and 94: tel-00827710, version 1 - 29 May 20
- Page 95 and 96: tel-00827710, version 1 - 29 May 20
- Page 97 and 98: tel-00827710, version 1 - 29 May 20
- Page 99 and 100: tel-00827710, version 1 - 29 May 20
- Page 101 and 102: tel-00827710, version 1 - 29 May 20
- Page 103 and 104: tel-00827710, version 1 - 29 May 20
- Page 105 and 106: tel-00827710, version 1 - 29 May 20
- Page 107 and 108: tel-00827710, version 1 - 29 May 20
- Page 109 and 110: tel-00827710, version 1 - 29 May 20
- Page 111 and 112: tel-00827710, version 1 - 29 May 20
- Page 113 and 114: tel-00827710, version 1 - 29 May 20
- Page 115 and 116: tel-00827710, version 1 - 29 May 20
- Page 117 and 118: tel-00827710, version 1 - 29 May 20
- Page 119 and 120: tel-00827710, version 1 - 29 May 20
- Page 121 and 122: tel-00827710, version 1 - 29 May 20
- Page 123 and 124: tel-00827710, version 1 - 29 May 20
- Page 125 and 126: tel-00827710, version 1 - 29 May 20
- Page 127: tel-00827710, version 1 - 29 May 20
- Page 131 and 132: tel-00827710, version 1 - 29 May 20
- Page 133 and 134: tel-00827710, version 1 - 29 May 20
- Page 135 and 136: tel-00827710, version 1 - 29 May 20
- Page 137 and 138: tel-00827710, version 1 - 29 May 20
- Page 139 and 140: tel-00827710, version 1 - 29 May 20
- Page 141 and 142: tel-00827710, version 1 - 29 May 20
- Page 143 and 144: tel-00827710, version 1 - 29 May 20
- Page 145 and 146: tel-00827710, version 1 - 29 May 20
- Page 147 and 148: tel-00827710, version 1 - 29 May 20
- Page 149 and 150: tel-00827710, version 1 - 29 May 20
- Page 151 and 152: tel-00827710, version 1 - 29 May 20
- Page 153 and 154: tel-00827710, version 1 - 29 May 20
- Page 155 and 156: tel-00827710, version 1 - 29 May 20
- Page 157 and 158: tel-00827710, version 1 - 29 May 20
- Page 159 and 160: tel-00827710, version 1 - 29 May 20
- Page 161 and 162: tel-00827710, version 1 - 29 May 20
- Page 163 and 164: tel-00827710, version 1 - 29 May 20
- Page 165 and 166: tel-00827710, version 1 - 29 May 20
- Page 167 and 168: tel-00827710, version 1 - 29 May 20
- Page 169 and 170: tel-00827710, version 1 - 29 May 20
- Page 171 and 172: tel-00827710, version 1 - 29 May 20
- Page 173 and 174: tel-00827710, version 1 - 29 May 20
- Page 175 and 176: tel-00827710, version 1 - 29 May 20
- Page 177 and 178: tel-00827710, version 1 - 29 May 20
tel-00827710, version 1 - 29 May 2013<br />
Figure 46. Enhancement of cross-priming upon late poly I:C <strong>de</strong>livery is type I IFN-<strong>de</strong>pen<strong>de</strong>nt.<br />
WT, IFNAR -/- and IRF3/7DKO mice were immunized i.d. with 5x10 5 K bm1 mOva splenocytes. Three<br />
days later, 100µg of poly I:C was administered. On day 10, the spleen and the draining lymph no<strong>de</strong><br />
were harvested and pooled. CD8 + T cells were purified to perform an IFNγ-Elispot. SFC, Spot<br />
forming cell.<br />
2) Late type I IFN enhance cross-priming at the level of antigen uptake<br />
and/or presentation<br />
As we observed that type I IFN are responsible for the enhancement of the response, we were<br />
interested in dissecting the mechanisms of this phenomenon and, in particular, d<strong>et</strong>ermining<br />
the targ<strong>et</strong>s of these cytokines. CD45.1/2 WT and CD45.2/2 IFNAR -/- OT-I were transferred<br />
into CD45.1/1 WT recipients. These mice were then immunized with K bm1 mOva splenocytes<br />
and injected with poly I:C three days later. Seven days post-immunization, OT-I cells were<br />
enriched with an anti-CD45.2 antibody for further characterization (Figure 47A). We<br />
observed that the percentage of IFNγ-producing cells increased upon poly I:C treatment in<br />
WT as well as in IFNAR -/- OT-I populations (Figure 47B). Similar increases in expression<br />
were obtained by comparing the MFI of the IFNγ signal in the two populations (Figure 47C).<br />
Of note, IL-2 and TNFα production by these cells was also evaluated (data not shown). No<br />
clear differences were observed for these cytokines either - the cells producing the highest<br />
amount of IFNγ were able to secr<strong>et</strong>e IL-2 and TNFα. From these data, we conclu<strong>de</strong>d that type<br />
I IFN act at the level of antigen uptake and/or presentation. However we also observed that<br />
the basal levels and the magnitu<strong>de</strong> of the increase was not the same b<strong>et</strong>ween WT and IFNAR -<br />
/- populations. Consequently, it is possible that these differences could be explained by the<br />
direct action of type I IFN on T cells.<br />
128