27.06.2013 Views

Forlong - Rivers of Life

Forlong - Rivers of Life

Forlong - Rivers of Life

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

26<br />

<strong>Rivers</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Life</strong>, or Faiths <strong>of</strong> Man in all Lands.<br />

works always on fixed plans. What means it, then, if ordinary theologies be true, that<br />

a cycle <strong>of</strong> the zodiac requires 25,810 years?—that is, this enormous time to complete<br />

one <strong>of</strong> its revolutions?—that a cycle <strong>of</strong> oscillation <strong>of</strong> the angle <strong>of</strong> the ecliptic requires,<br />

says La Place and Herschel, 20,250 years for completion?—that the cycle <strong>of</strong> eccentricity<br />

<strong>of</strong> the little orb we inhabit round its central, or rather non-central sun, requires for its<br />

completion possibly half a million <strong>of</strong> years, or accurately 515,610 years?—that a polar<br />

cycle or the precession <strong>of</strong> the ecliptic, from equator to pole, which alone explains our<br />

palms and mammoths under present eternal snows, may take 2,700,000 years to complete:<br />

that though light travel at the rate <strong>of</strong> 186,000 miles per second, there are stars<br />

whose light must have left them 6000 years before it reached us; that the time required<br />

for the orbits <strong>of</strong> comets, whose supposed erratic approach our astronomers will tell us<br />

to within a fraction <strong>of</strong> a second <strong>of</strong> time, varies from about 14,000 years to nearly<br />

123,000 years?—and lastly, what means this, that we, revolving in our own orbit at<br />

the rate <strong>of</strong> 68,000 miles per hour, or 600 millions <strong>of</strong> miles in one year, are also swung<br />

along towards some mysterious point in illimitable space at the awful speed <strong>of</strong><br />

150,000,000 <strong>of</strong> miles per annum? These are figures which we can calculate and write<br />

down, but which the mind <strong>of</strong> man is quite incapable <strong>of</strong> grasping. We and ours, aye<br />

our paltry planet, with its 8000 miles diameter, sink here into utter insignificance, and<br />

so surely do all its theologies, which have ever hitherto spoken <strong>of</strong> the phenomena<br />

<strong>of</strong> the mighty framer <strong>of</strong> these mysterious worlds and their ways.<br />

Without wandering away from our own little crust, we can, by some study, read<br />

<strong>of</strong>f millions <strong>of</strong> years from its latest fossils to its lifeless ages, by marking those <strong>of</strong> frozen<br />

and tropical zones, and calculating the possible times which each growth required for<br />

its rise and fall. From the glacial epoch, at the close <strong>of</strong> the tertiary period, to the<br />

fossils <strong>of</strong> the carboniferous epoch, now buried in an arctic zone, requires, we are told,<br />

nine ecliptic rotations, or 24,300,000 years, and Sir Charles Lyell says 240 millions <strong>of</strong><br />

years are required for the Cambrian formations. We would like to know what ages he<br />

would assign for the upheaval <strong>of</strong> the great Indian continent or lower Himalayas, which<br />

in the Miocene formations <strong>of</strong> the Sivalik ranges lying at their base, have disclosed to<br />

us huge extinct animals, amongst which is a strange four horned deer (the Siratherium)<br />

and a tortoise some eighteen feet long and seven feet high, with others, as giraffes and<br />

the ostrich, denoting vast plains instead <strong>of</strong> the rugged mountains which now cover all<br />

these parts. When were these l<strong>of</strong>ty mountains a sea-bed which nourished the nummulites,<br />

testaces, and other salt water creatures, now forming their earths and lime<br />

rocks, and how long did it take to cover such l<strong>of</strong>ty up-heavals with their now so prolific<br />

vegetable and animal life? Sir Charles would no doubt answer us, as he long since<br />

did similar questions, that “we require, when speaking <strong>of</strong> geological epochs, ‘to get<br />

the poverty out <strong>of</strong> our bones’ before we can take into consideration the eons <strong>of</strong> time<br />

that are required during which primeval people and language existed, and since which<br />

dispersion and segregation have been going on.”

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!