27.06.2013 Views

Forlong - Rivers of Life

Forlong - Rivers of Life

Forlong - Rivers of Life

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Introductory Chapter.<br />

The water which formed these stalagmite floors was, <strong>of</strong> course, drippings with lime<br />

in solution. The lamina is extremely thin, and though a portion <strong>of</strong> the stalagmite<br />

was removed from under the dripping twenty-two years ago, yet not a vestige <strong>of</strong><br />

fresh laminæ can be traced, but over the figures 1618 and 1615, well under the drip,<br />

a thin flake <strong>of</strong> less than 1-20th <strong>of</strong> an inch is apparent, which gives us the period<br />

necessary for this upper coat,—720,00 years. By another calculation this goes as high<br />

as 900,000 years. Taken by itself we might incline to reject such calculations, but<br />

when so much else points to the extreme age <strong>of</strong> the earth, geologists are justified in<br />

here showing us what these floors really mean. What stopped the drip for so many<br />

thousands <strong>of</strong> years and again renewed it? Had not a new, perhaps polar temperature,<br />

passed over this portion <strong>of</strong> the globe at that period? If so, then at the present rate<br />

<strong>of</strong> progression, Mr. T. Lumisden Strange, whose excellent paper on the “Earth’s age” 1<br />

I received when writing the above, tells us that two and a fourth millions <strong>of</strong> years<br />

would be required between the formation <strong>of</strong> the first floor and beginning <strong>of</strong> the formation<br />

<strong>of</strong> the second stalagmite base. Mr. Strange also gives us several calculations <strong>of</strong> man’s<br />

astronomical efforts, which go back to the time when the second cypress forest <strong>of</strong> New<br />

Orleans was probably being submerged. We have two very ancient zodiacs; one at<br />

Esne on the Nile, above Dendera (where are two somewhat modern ones), and one in<br />

India. Sir Wm. Drummond goes minutely into that <strong>of</strong> Esne, and calculates from its<br />

vernal equinox being between Gemini and Taurus, and therefore giving a retrogression<br />

<strong>of</strong> 3 signs or 1 deg. 20 min. from their present places, that the age <strong>of</strong> this zodiac when<br />

he wrote in 1811 was 6450 years, and therefore in 1873 its age would be 6512 years.<br />

Dupuis thinks that Virgo is the zenith <strong>of</strong> the Indian zodiac, and that its age it<br />

therefore nearly 1000 years more, or 7430 years; but by assuming the vernal equinox<br />

between Libra and Virgo, the Egyptian zodiacs would date back to 14,955 years, and<br />

the Indian one with Capricorn in zenith to 13,083 years. The only other alternation<br />

would involve putting the Indian zodiac back to 22,576, and the Egyptian one to<br />

30,100 years, so far as the signs <strong>of</strong> the zodiac are concerned. The precession <strong>of</strong> the<br />

equinoxes and real astronomical zodiac seems to have come to Europe through Hipparchus,<br />

who flourished 150 B.C. The Chinese had discovered the zodiac and various<br />

astronomical cycles in the time <strong>of</strong> their great emperor Hwangti, who flourished 2640<br />

B.C., and a glance down my Chart will show that hosts <strong>of</strong> busy minds were bent on<br />

these subjects all the way down to Hipparchus’ days.<br />

In regard to the theory <strong>of</strong> men springing from one stock, its advocates should<br />

note that Egypt gives us, in the year 3060 B.C., or thereabouts, pictures <strong>of</strong> Asiatics and<br />

negroes, and that a very ample time indeed must be allowed for the conversion <strong>of</strong> the<br />

white man to the negro, or vice versa. I must here, however, very briefly call attention<br />

to another great class <strong>of</strong> facts, which every year is bringing more forcibly before<br />

us. The great Creator <strong>of</strong> the Universe does nothing but for some wise purpose, and<br />

1 In Thomas Scott’s Series, vol. viii, and Strange’s Development <strong>of</strong> Creation, &c.<br />

25

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!