27.06.2013 Views

Forlong - Rivers of Life

Forlong - Rivers of Life

Forlong - Rivers of Life

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Ancestor Worship.<br />

“We,” said Californians, “have no concern with the preserver <strong>of</strong> sun, moon, and stars,<br />

and other objects <strong>of</strong> nature.” “All grew <strong>of</strong> its own accord,” said Kaffirs. “We have<br />

never allowed ourselves to think <strong>of</strong> the subject,” said Zulus. “Heaven and earth<br />

existed from the beginning,” said Polynesians; Mawe, “by means <strong>of</strong> a hook made<br />

<strong>of</strong> a jawbone, fished up New Zealand,” said Maories; and “Tougan was drawn up by<br />

Tongaloa,” said these islanders. “My ancestors made the world, and I am greater than<br />

they,” said the Queen <strong>of</strong> Singa, in Western Africa. Thus peacefully rested the illiterate<br />

mind, and we have not gained much on it, though we have spent great brain force,<br />

and written and perused many thousands <strong>of</strong> volumes.<br />

In a late review, our great physicist who electrified the religious world by his<br />

celebrated Belfast address—much abused, much written about, but never answered—<br />

thus expressed himself on these matters, in reply to the strictures <strong>of</strong> a Cardinal and a<br />

pious Theist:— 1<br />

“When I attempt to give the power which I see manifested in the universe an objective form<br />

personal or otherwise, it slips away from me, declining all intellectual manipulation. I dare not, save<br />

poetically, use the pronoun ‘he’ regarding it; I dare not call it a ‘mind;’ I refuse to call it even a<br />

‘cause’—its mystery overshadows me, but it remains a mystery; while the objective frames which my<br />

neighbours try to make it fit, simple distort and desecrate it . . . . . . . Physiologists say that every human<br />

being comes from an egg not more than 1-20th <strong>of</strong> an inch in diameter. Is this egg matter? I hold it<br />

to be so as much as the seed <strong>of</strong> a fern or <strong>of</strong> an oak. Nine months go into the making <strong>of</strong> it in a man.<br />

Are the additions made during this period <strong>of</strong> gestation drawn from matter? I think so undoubtedly.<br />

If there be anything besides matter in the egg or in the infant subsequently slumbering in the womb,<br />

what is it? Mr. Martineau will complain that I am disenchanting the babe <strong>of</strong> its wonder, but is this<br />

the case? I figure it growing in the womb, woven by a something not itself, without conscious parti-<br />

cipation on the part <strong>of</strong> either the father or the mother, and appearing in due time a living miracle, with<br />

all its organs and their implications. Consider the work accomplished during these nine months in<br />

forming the eye alone, with its lens and humours and its miraculous retina behind. Consider the ear,<br />

with its tympanum, cochlea, and corti-sorgan. An instrument <strong>of</strong> three thousand strings, built adjacent<br />

to the brain, and employed by it to sift, separate, and interpret antecedent to all consciousness the sono-<br />

rous tremors <strong>of</strong> the external world. All this has been accomplished, not only without man’s contrivance,<br />

but without his knowledge, the secret <strong>of</strong> his own organisation having been withheld from him since his<br />

birth in the immeasurable past until the other day. Matter I define as that mysterious thing by which<br />

all this is accomplished. How it came to have this power is a question on which I never ventured an<br />

opinion. If, then, matter starts as a ‘beggar,’ it is, in my view, because the Jacobs <strong>of</strong> theology have<br />

deprived it <strong>of</strong> its birthright.”<br />

It is this matter, mot, mother, which has perplexed all ages and nations, and perhaps<br />

it is on this account that Sanskrit acknowledges no word from primeval creation,<br />

and the first two bibles <strong>of</strong> men are silent even as to the idea. 2<br />

Sir John Lubbock writes that “the lower forms <strong>of</strong> religion are almost independent<br />

<strong>of</strong> prayer,” and that their followers <strong>of</strong>ten reject with scorn the idea <strong>of</strong> so exalted a Spirit<br />

or Being heeding their requests or being moved from his law or purposes, and say they<br />

have nothing to ask for as regards their souls or futurity. 3 Some have exclamations <strong>of</strong><br />

respect and hopefulness, as “may all be well,” &c. Fijians believe that some <strong>of</strong> the<br />

1 Fortnightly Review for Nov. 1874—Pr<strong>of</strong>essor Tyndall.<br />

2 The Rig-Veda, Zendavesta, and Homer are here silent, says Lubbock.—Origin <strong>of</strong> Civil., p. 252.<br />

3 Loc. Cit., p. 248.<br />

537

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!