Forlong - Rivers of Life

Forlong - Rivers of Life Forlong - Rivers of Life

93beast.fea.st
from 93beast.fea.st More from this publisher
27.06.2013 Views

16 Rivers of Life, or Faiths of Man in all Lands. They say justly that he authorized the most horrible massacres and immoralities, which indeed also characterise most of the tales and lives and characters of so many of the various early rulers and writers, whom the Hebrews call “men of God.” The Koran has also its tale as to its origin. A “pencil of light” wrote its sacred words, and the angel Gabriel, whom Hepworth Dixon shows us is almost a fourth person in the Grecian church calendar of their Deities (Father, Son, and Holy Ghost, Gabriel, Virgin, and last, but not least, the powerful Satan-God), revealed God’s (Ala’s) writing to Mahomed; Al is of course El or AR or RA, the Sun. The Bible as a whole, says Protestant Christendom, was written by the Holy Ghost, one of the three persons of the Christian Trinity; he only used the pens of various men, and made known to them past and present events, which it was impossible for them otherwise to know. History forms, however, a large portion of the Jewish and Christian Scriptures, and the relations of event sin these do not tally with other histories, or with each other; and the researches of modern criticism, never before scientifically applied to what have been ever held up as “sacred writings,” have shown discrepancies, omissions, and insertions, which have led learned and pious writers on the subject to decide against the facts, and to declare the writings unhistorical, as the authors are uncertain, and in many cases quite unknown. The volume called the Christian Bible was for ages a series of disconnected manuscripts, transcribed, added to and curtailed, again and again, from 630 B.C. to the days of printing 1516 A.C., or say for 220 years, and this was no doubt done by interested and often not perfectly reliable transcribers. Criticism has now shown that the first portion of the Old Testament only came to light, and that in a very curious and suspicious manner, in the days of Jeremiah, see Robertson, a strong writer on this subject—“the Finding of the Book,” in one of Mr. Scott’s very excellent series. The establishment of the documents as “the law of the Lord” was done through a noted high priest, Hilkiah, against whom the prophets wrote somewhat. Hilkiah was, however, evidently determined to establish priestly rule and church revenues; for Solomon’s temple, then and for seventy years before, dedicated to Phallic, Sun, and Fire worship, required all the hierarchical paraphernalia, as tithes, offering, vestments, and sacrifices, which that “book of the law” would give to Hilkiah, if he could but get it accepted as the “law of the Lord.” This, the writing called “Chronicles” accordingly states, and on the authority of some woman called ”Huldah the prophetess,” never heard of before or since, Hilkiah’s book became sacred and his church rich. Many of the Old Testament books contain the writings of generally good men, who denounce the vices of their times, and of their own people in particular, and foretell, in flowery language, what they thought of the rise and fall of the men and nations with which they were acquainted. The Old Testament, as Christians have it, is, according to Jewish writers, imperfect,

Introductory Chapter. but after some weeding out it was bound up as it is, along with various floating manuscripts, telling of Christ, his life, and sayings, in the fourth century A.C., and called “The Christian Bible.” The Brahmanical Bible, the Vedas or “Books of Truth,” are said to be written by God in the person of Brahma, the form in which Brahm executes his purposes of creation and providence. Unlike the Christian Bible, the Vedas do not command proselytism, nor allude to all being damned who do not know and acknowledge it, its gods, dogmas, and ceremonies. There is but one great and Almighty God, Brahm, or AUM, or OM, in the Hindoo faith, whose name is rarely, and then only very reverently whispered, as among the Jews. He is male and female, and the female energy, Maiya, Queen of Heaven, is more heard of than the Almighty. This is probably true of all faiths to the present day. I read in the Home News of January 1873, that Dr. Fraser, Bishop of Manchester, rebuked one of his clergy, but very mildly, for carrying a banner, on which was emblazoned the name of “the Queen of Heaven;” he remarked, that “though he was glad to see a revival of reverence, devotion, and piety, it must not be forgotten that there was a limit beyond which they must not go in imitating the practice of the thirteenth century.” In Hindooism, BRAHM manifests himself early in a Trinity. As a Creator, in BRAHMA. As Religion and Truth, in VISHNOO. As Matter or Passion, in Roodra, afterwards called SIVA, who was no doubt Rood or Ra, the Sun or Fertiliser. There are consorts or wives of these energies of God, having distinct names, though never creating in connection with the male energy. They are often called the Arks or abodes of the male deities. After them in heavenly order follow Devas—archangel and angels—too often worshipped by the ignorant; even Christians churches invoke Gabriel. They are a long list, emanating from Dyaus, Indra, Sun, Fire, &c. These deities take a deep interest, and are ever interfering in the affairs of men; not from them, however, does man spring, nor, though with female energies, does aught spring. The New Testament writer, borrowing no doubt from the Eastern tale, correctly says of them, “they neither marry nor are given in marriage, but are as the angels of God in heaven.” The Zendavesta and Tripitaka, I may here briefly say, inculcate a good life and a reasonable belief in the One Holy, Eternal and Almighty Spirit, though parts of the latter, relating to metaphysics, speak of Nihilism, which is, however, at utter variance with the life and doctrines of both its priests and people, as I can attest, after seven years’ residence and close observation in a land of the purest Boodhism in the world; I look upon such as a serious blot on any faith, though it does not, I think, lead to immoral or careless living, as some Christians fancy. The Old Testament Jews 17

16<br />

<strong>Rivers</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Life</strong>, or Faiths <strong>of</strong> Man in all Lands.<br />

They say justly that he authorized the most horrible massacres and immoralities,<br />

which indeed also characterise most <strong>of</strong> the tales and lives and characters <strong>of</strong> so<br />

many <strong>of</strong> the various early rulers and writers, whom the Hebrews call “men <strong>of</strong><br />

God.”<br />

The Koran has also its tale as to its origin. A “pencil <strong>of</strong> light” wrote its sacred<br />

words, and the angel Gabriel, whom Hepworth Dixon shows us is almost a fourth<br />

person in the Grecian church calendar <strong>of</strong> their Deities (Father, Son, and Holy Ghost,<br />

Gabriel, Virgin, and last, but not least, the powerful Satan-God), revealed God’s (Ala’s)<br />

writing to Mahomed; Al is <strong>of</strong> course El or AR or RA, the Sun.<br />

The Bible as a whole, says Protestant Christendom, was written by the Holy<br />

Ghost, one <strong>of</strong> the three persons <strong>of</strong> the Christian Trinity; he only used the pens <strong>of</strong><br />

various men, and made known to them past and present events, which it was impossible<br />

for them otherwise to know. History forms, however, a large portion <strong>of</strong> the<br />

Jewish and Christian Scriptures, and the relations <strong>of</strong> event sin these do not tally with<br />

other histories, or with each other; and the researches <strong>of</strong> modern criticism, never<br />

before scientifically applied to what have been ever held up as “sacred writings,”<br />

have shown discrepancies, omissions, and insertions, which have led learned and pious<br />

writers on the subject to decide against the facts, and to declare the writings unhistorical,<br />

as the authors are uncertain, and in many cases quite unknown.<br />

The volume called the Christian Bible was for ages a series <strong>of</strong> disconnected<br />

manuscripts, transcribed, added to and curtailed, again and again, from 630 B.C. to<br />

the days <strong>of</strong> printing 1516 A.C., or say for 220 years, and this was no doubt done by<br />

interested and <strong>of</strong>ten not perfectly reliable transcribers. Criticism has now shown<br />

that the first portion <strong>of</strong> the Old Testament only came to light, and that in a very<br />

curious and suspicious manner, in the days <strong>of</strong> Jeremiah, see Robertson, a strong<br />

writer on this subject—“the Finding <strong>of</strong> the Book,” in one <strong>of</strong> Mr. Scott’s very excellent<br />

series. The establishment <strong>of</strong> the documents as “the law <strong>of</strong> the Lord” was done<br />

through a noted high priest, Hilkiah, against whom the prophets wrote somewhat.<br />

Hilkiah was, however, evidently determined to establish priestly rule and church<br />

revenues; for Solomon’s temple, then and for seventy years before, dedicated to Phallic,<br />

Sun, and Fire worship, required all the hierarchical paraphernalia, as tithes, <strong>of</strong>fering,<br />

vestments, and sacrifices, which that “book <strong>of</strong> the law” would give to Hilkiah, if he<br />

could but get it accepted as the “law <strong>of</strong> the Lord.” This, the writing called<br />

“Chronicles” accordingly states, and on the authority <strong>of</strong> some woman called<br />

”Huldah the prophetess,” never heard <strong>of</strong> before or since, Hilkiah’s book became sacred<br />

and his church rich. Many <strong>of</strong> the Old Testament books contain the writings <strong>of</strong><br />

generally good men, who denounce the vices <strong>of</strong> their times, and <strong>of</strong> their own people<br />

in particular, and foretell, in flowery language, what they thought <strong>of</strong> the rise and fall<br />

<strong>of</strong> the men and nations with which they were acquainted.<br />

The Old Testament, as Christians have it, is, according to Jewish writers, imperfect,

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!