Forlong - Rivers of Life

Forlong - Rivers of Life Forlong - Rivers of Life

93beast.fea.st
from 93beast.fea.st More from this publisher
27.06.2013 Views

506 Rivers of Life, or Faiths of Man in all Lands. “the deified Pagan,” and dead men’s bones were besought by honest and honourable women desirous of offspring, instead of the ancient Solar and Lunar Gods, whose special and not inapt function it had been to assist in these matters. But for Alexandria and its library, Egypt would no doubt have withstood a change of faith; as it was, it early rejected Christianity, and its unbounded superstitions; considering its “Father, Son, and Holy Ghost,” by no means so good as the old creating God—his wisdom in Isis, and power and production in Horus and the loved ancient memories connected with these. The masses, however, held the faith lightly, and succumbed at once to the Arabian Iconoclast, who came proclaiming to her sternly and clearly; “There is but one God, and I, though but a man, am his Prophet, and am commanded to bear to you the tidings that ye worship and bow to Him alone.” This was a return to the Theism which had in OM or ON, and ISIS, and the fertilizing orbs of heaven, still breathed mysteriously of one great Creative Father—a Triune God, it is true, but whom no cultured mind in Egypt ever believed could produce a son by the agency of any mere woman. Though, indeed, he created all animal, fish, bird, and vegetable life, yet he himself was held to be the great uncreated and Incomprehensible Almighty One, which every idea, as in On, Am-On, Knef, or Phtha, only threw further back into the lone and unfathomable depths of lnfinity. 1 Ancient amid the most ancient Faiths, Egypt loved to look back, like the Hebrew, to her mythic representative gods and god-like men, and though she now saw her great Father’s power eclipsed for a time, and on his own Egyptian soil, yet so had this before occurred through Typhon’s agency. Had not Ba-al and Nishrok, Zeus and Apollo, they said, to bend before new Gods and ideas? Indra and Varoona had given place to Vishnoo and Lakshmi; even great Vishnoo had been forced by evil ones to leave Swerga; and so feeble and obscure a deity as Jaland-hāra had been permitted for a time to hide the great Narāyana from man’s gaze. The eclipse was but to usher in a more glorious day. In the fall of Serapis, however, wise Egyptians must have seen the last of a great number of serious blows, which had been shattering the ancient fabrics. Their great enemy now was not really the new faith, but Light, and that not of Sun or Osiris! nay, but of that strange new shrine to which all were now flocking, “the Alexandrian Library!” Libraries and Temples, Secular Readers and Priests, cannot agree, as all churches and Eastern faiths have long acknowledged. Did not Omer, the great Arabian Kalif, on his first advent, at once destroy the later Alexandrian Library? saying that the Korán contained all that man required to know, and that “if these books contained more or less, they were not only prejudicial to man but blasphemous in the sight of God”! And would not even Protestant priests, and many well-meaning and so-called pious Christian men amongst ourselves, burn the volumes of many of our historians, critics and scientists, if they could? Rome, wherever possiblc, has insisted on “the Faithful” reading no books but her own, and has very lately rejoiced at, if not urged on, her faithful Canadians to resist the Queen’s laws, courts, and even arms, rather than 1 [This notion that ancient Egyptian religion was in general ‘essentially monotheistic’ is now regarded as a delusion due to the prejudices of nineteenth-century writers and bad early translations. — T.S.]

Sun Worship. bury, in what she calls consecrated ground, and in the tomb of his wife, the body of one of her own sons, because he belongs to a Library in which he had permitted, without protest, certain volumes which the church in her vigilance had placed upon her Index Expurgatorius, and which she dreaded might prove destructive of her power and authority. If literature aided Christianity, and wise men rejoiced amidst the treasures of the Alexandrian Library, yet none the less did her priestly guardians soon wake up to a full comprehension of the dangers which this new force threatened. To be forewarned is to be forearmed, and the new faith diabolically led the way in a course which, as a Cburch, she has rarely deviated from, of destroying all literature, save such as did not infringe upon or criticise her own inanities. In 391 those who had burned Serapis and ereeted another idol temple on his foundations, avenged themselves on all mankind by burning down the first Alexandrian Library; and a thousand years after that event, their consistent successors were able to assert with pious joy—from a once Imperial throne, which mentally down-trodden Europe had allowed them to set up—that Rome possessed scarcely a book but Missals. 1 Literature had then indeed reason to rejoice that a decree of heaven went forth driving her out of Africa, as well as Asia and Spain, although she had initiated a movement wbich led the Saracen in 640 to follow her infamous example, and again burn an Alexandrian Library, and in 850 possibly also the Basilican one of Constantinople. With empire, however, the Islámis recovered their self-possession, and in Cordova, Bagdad, Alexandria and elsewhere, tried to atone for the past, in which they very largely succeeded, as I shall show in my chapter on Mahomedanism. At the sack of Constantinople, in 1452, we again lost an enormous amount of literature. Some 120,000 Greek manuscripts were then known to have perished, though the hatred and pious zeal of Christian Priests and Monks had injured or interpolated many of these. It was then the Custom of the clerical order to sell what they called “profane” literature as waste paper to “book binders and racket-makers” ! and many monks and priests used to spend their worthless lives with professional calligraphists, “obliterating the writings by chemical preparations. . . . In this way thousands of valuable MSS. have been lost. . . . . . . Popes and clergy waged war on historians and poets.” Fortunately some eminent men busied themselves deciphering the old writing under the new, and Greek dramas and Latin orations of “noble Pagans” were recovered under trumpery poems or theological nonsense. In this way was won back much of Plautus and Terence, a work of Dionysius of Halicarnassus, and eight hundred lines of a very ancient Iliad. 2 The Roman world early accepted Serapis as the best development of religion which had arisen on the ruins of the Greek oracular shrines. Serapis also was but the outcome of the worship of Mithras, which first appeared as a distinct creed at the seats of Roman Empire after the conquest of Pontus by Pompey. It soon superseded the Hellenic and Italian gods, and during the second and third centuries of the Empire, Serapis and 1 “In 1400 there was scarcely a book in Rome but Missals.”—Mill of Facts, p. 635. 2 Ibid., p. 635. 507

506<br />

<strong>Rivers</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Life</strong>, or Faiths <strong>of</strong> Man in all Lands.<br />

“the deified Pagan,” and dead men’s bones were besought by honest and honourable<br />

women desirous <strong>of</strong> <strong>of</strong>fspring, instead <strong>of</strong> the ancient Solar and Lunar Gods, whose<br />

special and not inapt function it had been to assist in these matters.<br />

But for Alexandria and its library, Egypt would no doubt have withstood a<br />

change <strong>of</strong> faith; as it was, it early rejected Christianity, and its unbounded superstitions;<br />

considering its “Father, Son, and Holy Ghost,” by no means so good as the old<br />

creating God—his wisdom in Isis, and power and production in Horus and the loved<br />

ancient memories connected with these. The masses, however, held the faith lightly,<br />

and succumbed at once to the Arabian Iconoclast, who came proclaiming to her sternly<br />

and clearly; “There is but one God, and I, though but a man, am his Prophet, and<br />

am commanded to bear to you the tidings that ye worship and bow to Him alone.”<br />

This was a return to the Theism which had in OM or ON, and ISIS, and the fertilizing<br />

orbs <strong>of</strong> heaven, still breathed mysteriously <strong>of</strong> one great Creative Father—a Triune<br />

God, it is true, but whom no cultured mind in Egypt ever believed could produce a son by<br />

the agency <strong>of</strong> any mere woman. Though, indeed, he created all animal, fish, bird, and<br />

vegetable life, yet he himself was held to be the great uncreated and Incomprehensible<br />

Almighty One, which every idea, as in On, Am-On, Knef, or Phtha, only threw further<br />

back into the lone and unfathomable depths <strong>of</strong> lnfinity. 1 Ancient amid the most<br />

ancient Faiths, Egypt loved to look back, like the Hebrew, to her mythic representative<br />

gods and god-like men, and though she now saw her great Father’s power<br />

eclipsed for a time, and on his own Egyptian soil, yet so had this before occurred through<br />

Typhon’s agency. Had not Ba-al and Nishrok, Zeus and Apollo, they said, to bend before<br />

new Gods and ideas? Indra and Varoona had given place to Vishnoo and Lakshmi;<br />

even great Vishnoo had been forced by evil ones to leave Swerga; and so feeble and<br />

obscure a deity as Jaland-hāra had been permitted for a time to hide the great Narāyana<br />

from man’s gaze. The eclipse was but to usher in a more glorious day.<br />

In the fall <strong>of</strong> Serapis, however, wise Egyptians must have seen the last <strong>of</strong> a great<br />

number <strong>of</strong> serious blows, which had been shattering the ancient fabrics. Their great<br />

enemy now was not really the new faith, but Light, and that not <strong>of</strong> Sun or Osiris!<br />

nay, but <strong>of</strong> that strange new shrine to which all were now flocking, “the Alexandrian<br />

Library!” Libraries and Temples, Secular Readers and Priests, cannot agree, as all<br />

churches and Eastern faiths have long acknowledged. Did not Omer, the great Arabian<br />

Kalif, on his first advent, at once destroy the later Alexandrian Library? saying that<br />

the Korán contained all that man required to know, and that “if these books contained<br />

more or less, they were not only prejudicial to man but blasphemous in the sight <strong>of</strong><br />

God”! And would not even Protestant priests, and many well-meaning and so-called<br />

pious Christian men amongst ourselves, burn the volumes <strong>of</strong> many <strong>of</strong> our historians,<br />

critics and scientists, if they could? Rome, wherever possiblc, has insisted on “the<br />

Faithful” reading no books but her own, and has very lately rejoiced at, if not urged<br />

on, her faithful Canadians to resist the Queen’s laws, courts, and even arms, rather than<br />

1 [This notion that ancient Egyptian religion was in general ‘essentially monotheistic’ is now regarded as<br />

a delusion due to the prejudices <strong>of</strong> nineteenth-century writers and bad early translations. — T.S.]

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!