Forlong - Rivers of Life
Forlong - Rivers of Life Forlong - Rivers of Life
12 Rivers of Life, or Faiths of Man in all Lands. missionaries and Christianity. One placard was headed, “Leave these fanatics . . . they cannot answer a simple question seriously put in to them connection with what they say; they senselessly abuse you and your faiths without having studied them at all; they are hirelings, working against truth and common sense and against the dictates of conscience for a paltry piece of earthly bread. . . . You know well, and it is a patent fact, that their harangues cannot stand discussion. Do not waste time with impostors; serve the God of the Universe heartily; He alone will save all who so serve Him.” This phase will yet much intensify. Christianity will have to try and stand and defend herself which she is ill able to do dialectically and historically. At present she says take me on trust, or, as its advocates and those of Mahomedanism and Boodhism say, “by Faith,”—yea, the blindest and most unreasoning faith. None can prove their three prophets to be Gods or even to be miraculously sent from God, nor their Bibles inspired revelations nor even historically correct: No; this and all such statements must be accepted blindly, and then of course any other gulp is easy, and the unreasoning convert can speak glibly and freely of “the peace and joy of believing,” and the misery of those “hard- hearted unbelievers” whom his new God in his mercy, has foreordained from all eternity “to everlasting misery with the devil and his angels in the fire which will never be quenched.” He can set forth all the beautiful traits in Boodha’s as in Christ’s and Mahomed’s life and character, and point to the many good biblical morals which no one denies, but which are perfectly useless so far as the establishment of the faiths go. Let me here quote from Professor Huxley what he has experienced in his scientific researches as to the way in which Priests justify their unjust acts:—“Everywhere have they broken the spirit of wisdom and tried to stop human progress by quotations from their Bibles or books of their saints—In this nineteenth century, as at the dawn of modern physical science, the cosmogony of the semi-barbarous Hebrew is the incubus of the philosopher, and the opprobrium of the orthodox. Who shall number the patient and earnest seekers after truth, from the days of Galileo until now, whose lives have been embittered and their good name blasted, by the mistaken zeal of bibliolaters? Who shall count the host of weaker men whose sense of truth has been destroyed in the effort to harmonize impossibilities; whose life has been wasted in the attempt to force the generous new wine of science into the old bottles of Judaism, compelled by the outcry of the strong party? It is true that if philosophers have suffered, their cause has been amply avenged.—Extinguished theologies lie about the cradle of every science, as the strangled snakes beside that of Hercules; and history records that whenever science and orthodoxy have been fairly opposed, the latter has been forced to retire from the lists, bleeding and crushed if not annihilated, scotched if not slain. But orthodoxy learns not, neither can it forget, and though at present bewildered and afraid to move, it is as willing as ever to insist, that the first Chapter of Genesis contained the beginning and the end of sound science, and to visit with such petty thunder-
Introductory Chapter. bolts, as its half-paralysed hands can hurl, those who refuse to degrade nature to the level of primitive Judaism.” 1 “Religion,” he also elsewhere writes, “arising like all other knowledge out of the action and interaction of man’s mind, has taken the intellectual coverings of Fetishism, Polytheism, of Theism or Atheism, of Superstition or Rationalism; and if the religion of the present differs from that of the past, it is because the theology of the present has become more scientific than that of the past, not because it has renounced idols of Woods and idols of Stone, but begins to see the necessity of breaking in pieces the idols built up of books and traditions and fine spun ecclesiastical cobwebs, and of cherishing the noblest and most human of man’s emotions, by worship ‘for the most part of the silent sort’ at the altar of the unknown and unknowable. . . . . If a man asks me, what the politics of the inhabitants of the moon are, and I reply that I know not, that neither I nor any one else have any means of knowing, and that under these circumstances I decline to trouble myself about the subject at all, I do not think he has any right to call me a sceptic.” 2 Again, “what are among the moral convictions most fondly held by barbarous and semi-barbarous people? They are the convictions that authority is the soundest basis of belief; that merit attaches to a readiness to believe, that the doubting disposition is a bad one, and scepticism a sin, and there are many excellent persons who still hold by these principles;” . . . . . “Yet we have no reason to believe that it is the improvement of our faith, nor that of our morals which keeps the plague from our city; but it is the improvement of our natural knowledge. We have learned that pestilences will only take up their abode among those who have prepared unswept and ungarnished residences for them. Their cities must have narrow, unwatered streets full of accumulated garbage, their houses must be ill-drained, ill-ventilated; their subjects must be ill-lighted, ill-washed, ill-fed, illclothed; the London of 1665 was such a city; the cities of the east, where plague has an enduring dwelling, are such cites; we in later times have learned somewhat of nature, and partly obey her. Because of this partial improvement of our natural knowledge, and of that fractional obedience, we have no plague; but because that knowledge is very imperfect, and that obedience yet incomplete, typhus is our companion and cholera our visitor.” Former generations, and indeed many among us still say, it is the hand of God, let us humble ourselves before his awful judgements, let us have days for prayer and fasting; all this is ignorance and superstition which we are getting ashamed of. But to return to Bibliolatry or the worship of sacred books and prophets. In my Chart I have denoted this vast phase of faith by a blue band. It will be seen in every stream, commencing with reverence for the Vedas. The books are shut to the people till the days of printing, when I show one open Bible. I will here give the dates of these sacred books in the order of the Chart, that is, chronologically, according to the best writers of the present day. 1 [T.H. Huxley “The Origin of Species” (a review of Darwin’s book; 1860). — T.S.] 2 [Huxley, “On the Advisableness of Improving Natural Knowledge” (1866; reprinted in vol I of Huxley’s collected essays). The two quotations following are from the same essay. — T.S.] 13
- Page 3 and 4: CONTENTS VOL. I. I. INTRODUCTORY .
- Page 5 and 6: NO. Page 1 Ficus Indica, with Idols
- Page 7 and 8: REFERENCES WORKS WHICH HAVE BEEN RE
- Page 9 and 10: References. ix ARCHEOLOGY OF KELTS,
- Page 11 and 12: References. xi GENERAL LITERATURE V
- Page 13 and 14: PREFACE IT being now several years
- Page 15 and 16: Preface. xv cliffs, beside secret c
- Page 17 and 18: Preface. xvii more ancient Turano-B
- Page 19 and 20: Preface. xix from this retreat that
- Page 21 and 22: Preface. xxi did Rāma, great Vishn
- Page 23 and 24: Preface. xxiii line, feminine, and
- Page 25 and 26: Preface. xxv and lines of inquiry,
- Page 27 and 28: Preface. xxvii means altogether, to
- Page 29 and 30: Preface. xxix truth, and his studio
- Page 31 and 32: Preface. xxxi histories of all peop
- Page 33 and 34: Preface. xxxiii who thou art, but I
- Page 35 and 36: Preface. xxxv but especially of the
- Page 37 and 38: Preface. xxxvii or etymological use
- Page 39 and 40: Preface. xxxix which has improved a
- Page 41: Preface. xli Indian gentlemen wbo h
- Page 44 and 45: 2 Rivers of Life, or Faiths of Man
- Page 46 and 47: 4 Rivers of Life, or Faiths of Man
- Page 48 and 49: 6 Rivers of Life, or Faiths of Man
- Page 50 and 51: 8 Rivers of Life, or Faiths of Man
- Page 52 and 53: 10 Rivers of Life, or Faiths of Man
- Page 56 and 57: 14 Rivers of Life, or Faiths of Man
- Page 58 and 59: 16 Rivers of Life, or Faiths of Man
- Page 60 and 61: 18 Rivers of Life, or Faiths of Man
- Page 62 and 63: 20 Rivers of Life, or Faiths of Man
- Page 64 and 65: 22 Rivers of Life, or Faiths of Man
- Page 66 and 67: 24 Rivers of Life, or Faiths of Man
- Page 68 and 69: 26 Rivers of Life, or Faiths of Man
- Page 70 and 71: 28 Rivers of Life, or Faiths of Man
- Page 72 and 73: 30 Rivers of Life, or Faiths of Man
- Page 74 and 75: 32 Rivers of Life, or Faiths of Man
- Page 76 and 77: 34 Rivers of Life, or Faiths of Man
- Page 78 and 79: 36 Rivers of Life, or Faiths of Man
- Page 80 and 81: 38 Rivers of Life, or Faiths of Man
- Page 82 and 83: 40 Rivers of Life, or Faiths of Man
- Page 84 and 85: 42 Rivers of Life, or Faiths of Man
- Page 86 and 87: 44 Rivers of Life, or Faiths of Man
- Page 88 and 89: 46 Rivers of Life, or Faiths of Man
- Page 90 and 91: 48 Rivers of Life, or Faiths of Man
- Page 92 and 93: 50 Rivers of Life, or Faiths of Man
- Page 94 and 95: 52 Rivers of Life, or Faiths of Man
- Page 96 and 97: 54 Rivers of Life, or Faiths of Man
- Page 98 and 99: 56 Rivers of Life, or Faiths of Man
- Page 100 and 101: 58 Rivers of Life, or Faiths of Man
- Page 102 and 103: 60 Rivers of Life, or Faiths of Man
12<br />
<strong>Rivers</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Life</strong>, or Faiths <strong>of</strong> Man in all Lands.<br />
missionaries and Christianity. One placard was headed, “Leave these fanatics . . .<br />
they cannot answer a simple question seriously put in to them connection with what<br />
they say; they senselessly abuse you and your faiths without having studied them at<br />
all; they are hirelings, working against truth and common sense and against the<br />
dictates <strong>of</strong> conscience for a paltry piece <strong>of</strong> earthly bread. . . . You know well, and<br />
it is a patent fact, that their harangues cannot stand discussion. Do not waste<br />
time with impostors; serve the God <strong>of</strong> the Universe heartily; He alone will save<br />
all who so serve Him.” This phase will yet much intensify. Christianity<br />
will have to try and stand and defend herself which she is ill able to do<br />
dialectically and historically. At present she says take me on trust, or, as its<br />
advocates and those <strong>of</strong> Mahomedanism and Boodhism say, “by Faith,”—yea, the<br />
blindest and most unreasoning faith. None can prove their three prophets to be Gods<br />
or even to be miraculously sent from God, nor their Bibles inspired revelations nor<br />
even historically correct: No; this and all such statements must be accepted blindly,<br />
and then <strong>of</strong> course any other gulp is easy, and the unreasoning convert can speak glibly<br />
and freely <strong>of</strong> “the peace and joy <strong>of</strong> believing,” and the misery <strong>of</strong> those “hard-<br />
hearted unbelievers” whom his new God in his mercy, has foreordained from all eternity<br />
“to everlasting misery with the devil and his angels in the fire which will never be<br />
quenched.” He can set forth all the beautiful traits in Boodha’s as in Christ’s and<br />
Mahomed’s life and character, and point to the many good biblical morals which no<br />
one denies, but which are perfectly useless so far as the establishment <strong>of</strong> the faiths go.<br />
Let me here quote from Pr<strong>of</strong>essor Huxley what he has experienced in his scientific<br />
researches as to the way in which Priests justify their unjust acts:—“Everywhere<br />
have they broken the spirit <strong>of</strong> wisdom and tried to stop human progress by quotations<br />
from their Bibles or books <strong>of</strong> their saints—In this nineteenth century, as at the dawn <strong>of</strong><br />
modern physical science, the cosmogony <strong>of</strong> the semi-barbarous Hebrew is the incubus<br />
<strong>of</strong> the philosopher, and the opprobrium <strong>of</strong> the orthodox. Who shall number the<br />
patient and earnest seekers after truth, from the days <strong>of</strong> Galileo until now, whose lives<br />
have been embittered and their good name blasted, by the mistaken zeal <strong>of</strong> bibliolaters?<br />
Who shall count the host <strong>of</strong> weaker men whose sense <strong>of</strong> truth has been destroyed in the<br />
effort to harmonize impossibilities; whose life has been wasted in the attempt to force<br />
the generous new wine <strong>of</strong> science into the old bottles <strong>of</strong> Judaism, compelled by the<br />
outcry <strong>of</strong> the strong party? It is true that if philosophers have suffered, their<br />
cause has been amply avenged.—Extinguished theologies lie about the cradle <strong>of</strong> every<br />
science, as the strangled snakes beside that <strong>of</strong> Hercules; and history records that<br />
whenever science and orthodoxy have been fairly opposed, the latter has been forced<br />
to retire from the lists, bleeding and crushed if not annihilated, scotched if not slain.<br />
But orthodoxy learns not, neither can it forget, and though at present bewildered and<br />
afraid to move, it is as willing as ever to insist, that the first Chapter <strong>of</strong> Genesis contained<br />
the beginning and the end <strong>of</strong> sound science, and to visit with such petty thunder-