Forlong - Rivers of Life

Forlong - Rivers of Life Forlong - Rivers of Life

93beast.fea.st
from 93beast.fea.st More from this publisher
27.06.2013 Views

278 Rivers of Life, or Faiths of Man in all Lands. I must now say something regarding our ancient British shrines, although at the certain risk of incurring severe criticism. Nevertheless it seems a duty here to give my views for what they may be worth, and as I fust approached the study with a very poor knowledge of the fierce wars which European writers have here waged, so, as being perhaps in this respect unbiassed, and with my own mind filled with facts culled amid Eastern faiths, my opinions may be worth contributing; anyhow, I will try that they may be brief, and being now very decided and clear to myself, they may well be so. I began my study of British ruins about eight years ago (1866)—during a two-year furlough, attracted to it at first by my friend the late Sir James Simpson—President of the Society of Antiquaries, Edinburgh—at that time writing and debating much on these matters; and I came then to the same conclusion as I hold to-day; viz., that the ruins of Armorika, those of Stonehenge, Abury, and various others, known popularly as “Druid circles,” are, or originally were Phallo-Pythic-Solar shrines, or places where all the first five elemental faiths seen in this chart more or less flourished; the first (Tree) very little, and the last (Sun) very abundantly; and if so, then we see the cause why European writers so pugnaciously hold out, some for Sun, some for Fire; one that they are mere places for sacrifice or burial, or for assembly of rulers, clans, &c. whilst a few outlying writers hint that the large stones are Lingams, or mere groups of such stones as that of Kerloaz—the Newton stone, &c., see my Plate IX. Colonel Forbes Leslie, in his Ancient Races of Scotland, has very nearly told us the whole truth, his long residence and travels in Asia having enabled him almost to pierce the cloud, though he seems at first not to have fully appreciated the ever very close connection between Sun, Fire, Serpent, and Lingam faiths, which I believe he does now. The European mind having once lost the old ideas of what these words meant, and from having still such objects as Sun, Fire, and Serpent before them, are always thinking of these visible objects, which I might almost say a true Sivaite never recognises per se; for in fire the true Phallic-worshipper sees no flame, and in the Sun no far-out resplendent orb as we know, standing apart, as it were, in space, and to which we all gravitate; he sees simply a source of fertility, without which the Serpent has no power or passion, and in whose absence the animal and vegetable world must cease to exist. The fire here, then, is not that which the real Sivaite sees or cooks by, but Hot or “Holy Fire,” or the “Holy Spirit,” or the fire of passion,. which to a certain small extent, and in certain symbolic forms and positions, he recognises in flame, as when raised on a tower, coming out of an obelisk, or rising in a column or pillar over an ark, or smouldering in the secret adytum; for the first impresses him with the Arkite, the second with the Phallic and Arkite, and the third with the purely feminine idea; in all, he merely sees representative male and female energies which are excited and fructified by the Sun, Apollo, or the Sun-Serpent, as in his old coin, Fig. 131, where fertility fed by fire, feeds the shell. In a column be it

278<br />

<strong>Rivers</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Life</strong>, or Faiths <strong>of</strong> Man in all Lands.<br />

I must now say something regarding our ancient British shrines, although at the<br />

certain risk <strong>of</strong> incurring severe criticism. Nevertheless it seems a duty here to give<br />

my views for what they may be worth, and as I fust approached the study with a very<br />

poor knowledge <strong>of</strong> the fierce wars which European writers have here waged, so, as being<br />

perhaps in this respect unbiassed, and with my own mind filled with facts culled amid<br />

Eastern faiths, my opinions may be worth contributing; anyhow, I will try that<br />

they may be brief, and being now very decided and clear to myself, they may well<br />

be so.<br />

I began my study <strong>of</strong> British ruins about eight years ago (1866)—during a two-year<br />

furlough, attracted to it at first by my friend the late Sir James Simpson—President <strong>of</strong><br />

the Society <strong>of</strong> Antiquaries, Edinburgh—at that time writing and debating much on<br />

these matters; and I came then to the same conclusion as I hold to-day; viz., that<br />

the ruins <strong>of</strong> Armorika, those <strong>of</strong> Stonehenge, Abury, and various others, known popularly<br />

as “Druid circles,” are, or originally were Phallo-Pythic-Solar shrines, or places<br />

where all the first five elemental faiths seen in this chart more or less flourished; the<br />

first (Tree) very little, and the last (Sun) very abundantly; and if so, then we see the<br />

cause why European writers so pugnaciously hold out, some for Sun, some for Fire; one<br />

that they are mere places for sacrifice or burial, or for assembly <strong>of</strong> rulers, clans, &c.<br />

whilst a few outlying writers hint that the large stones are Lingams, or mere groups <strong>of</strong><br />

such stones as that <strong>of</strong> Kerloaz—the Newton stone, &c., see my Plate IX. Colonel<br />

Forbes Leslie, in his Ancient Races <strong>of</strong> Scotland, has very nearly told us the whole<br />

truth, his long residence and travels in Asia having enabled him almost to pierce the<br />

cloud, though he seems at first not to have fully appreciated the ever very close connection<br />

between Sun, Fire, Serpent, and Lingam faiths, which I believe he does now.<br />

The European mind having once lost the old ideas <strong>of</strong> what these words meant, and<br />

from having still such objects as Sun, Fire, and Serpent before them, are always<br />

thinking <strong>of</strong> these visible objects, which I might almost say a true Sivaite never<br />

recognises per se; for in fire the true Phallic-worshipper sees no flame, and in the Sun<br />

no far-out resplendent orb as we know, standing apart, as it were, in space, and to<br />

which we all gravitate; he sees simply a source <strong>of</strong> fertility, without which the Serpent<br />

has no power or passion, and in whose absence the animal and vegetable world must<br />

cease to exist. The fire here, then, is not that which the real Sivaite sees or cooks by,<br />

but Hot or “Holy Fire,” or the “Holy Spirit,” or the fire <strong>of</strong> passion,. which to a<br />

certain small extent, and in certain symbolic forms and positions, he recognises in<br />

flame, as when raised on a tower, coming out <strong>of</strong> an obelisk, or rising in a column<br />

or pillar over an ark, or smouldering in the secret adytum; for the first impresses<br />

him with the Arkite, the second with the Phallic and Arkite, and the third with<br />

the purely feminine idea; in all, he merely sees representative male and female<br />

energies which are excited and fructified by the Sun, Apollo, or the Sun-Serpent, as in<br />

his old coin, Fig. 131, where fertility fed by fire, feeds the shell. In a column be it

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!