Forlong - Rivers of Life
Forlong - Rivers of Life Forlong - Rivers of Life
216 Rivers of Life, or Faiths of Man in all Lands. This Molten Sea, Fig, 90. was, we are assuered, most correctly constructed. As it represented woman, so all the females of Jerusalem brought forth their most representative emblem—the Mirror—which as Maya the Sanskrit Aryan calls Illusion, a word I believe really meaning that by which man may reproduce or reflect himself. Anyhow, the mirror is a most suitable and universal emblem of Maya over all Asia; in this, Fig. 91, I show it in the form it is constantly found in the palaces and temples of the Nile. The head ornament or burden of the woman is here a Cone, similar to that which Egyptian women are usually shown with; for if Siva carries Luna, and the Agathodemon a lotus, then woman must so honour the Cone; and I believe the first occasion on which they likewise came freely forward and poured their golden trinkets into Aaron’s lap, was for the construction of such a golden Cone, and not a Calf as the LXX. translators tell us. As the Jewesses of the desert well knew their own religion and the object of their affections, so I think did those of Jerusalem know the cult they were enriching, and the sexual proclivities of their king and his very Sivaik shrine. They knew well that the large “bowl” for which they were giving those ornaments—so precious to a woman’s heart—was no mere bowl for water; justs as, I believe, their ancient mothers knew that it was no mere calf that Fig 92—EGYPTIAN MIRROR AND WOMAN Aaron made, and before which they bowed down. The word lnu, used in Exodus xxxii. as “Calf,” signifies, we are told by Parkhurst, something “Round” or “Orbicular,” as a “round ornament;” even a “round ring,” “car,” or “corn-wain,” &c. He particu- larly warns us that, as translated “Calf,” we are merely to consider this “Emblematic,” and because such, “both to believers and unbelievers and heathem, was a representative of FIRE.” “The golden calves of Aaron and Jeroboam were,” continues this very orthodox Hebraist, “set up as secondary representatives of the First Person (as we speak) of the ever blessed Trinity, whose primary em- blem was FIRE. . . . . Both Aaron and Jeroboam meant their respective CALVES FOR EMBLEMS OF JEHOVAH . . . . . and each called his respective calf ALEIM,” who is the Lord and God of the Old Testament; so that the conclusion arrived at is, that Fire and Apis or Aphis were true emblems of Jehovah. In fact, we may say that this Jah was Fire and Apis; and we need not dispute, therefore, as to whether “the gold ear-rings” of the Aaronic tribes were made into a “Calf,” or, as I think, into an “orbicular” object, or “mass,” “embroyo” or “fœtus;” or into a cone which is usually called “the breaker through,” a true meaning of lnu (Fürst), and a very proper emblem for Jah, whose name, says the same great Hebraist, signifies “The Increaser” Mr. Parkhurst was probably not aware that the Hindoo called this seat of “Fire,” the Agni-Mandalam!
Serpent and Phallic Worship. I will now enter into the details of the construction of Solomon’s and the second temple, which, as a young engineer, I, a great many years ago, tried to construct from the bible, together with such other traditional writings as have come down to us. The results were startling, and to my then sealed eyes, awakening. Like all edifices more or less connected with Tsabean or Sun-Worship, the aspect of Solomon’s temple was strictly correct in regard to His Solar Majesty. The recent researches in Palestine show (see an Edin. Review of 1873) that “the sunrise-line through temple and altar, and through the central western gate of the mountain, and the great east gate of the sanctuary, bisects the enclosure of the Haram north and south; while the meridian line, determining the face of the platform, bisects the southern wall of the sanctuary.” 1 Yet this writer, though mentioning also that “the orientation of this temple” caused it to be thus placed obliquely to the other necessary enclosure walls, also that “Greek and Coelo-Syrian temples” were so built as of prime necessity to face the rising Sun-God, that all Palmyra’s gorgeous temples were similarly placed, and that even Stonehenge has a great stone which, seen from the centre of the circle, declares the point of sunrise in the fertile summer solstice; yet, in spite of all these proofs of the faith of these ancient worshippers, this writer, like many others, sees nothing in Solomon’s Pagan Temple, but the pure and spiritual worship of Jehovah which this century is almost alone in grasping. Strange, indeed, are the vicissitudes of faiths. Titus Cesar levelled the “Holy Temple” of Jehovah in the year 70 A.C.— the second of the Emperor Vespasian; and Hadrian drew a ploughshare over the consecrated ground, as a sign of perpetual interdiction (see Gibbon, III. 161). A few years more saw a temple to Venus on the spot where it is supposed the death and resurrec- tion of Christ took place; and there this latter stood for nearly three hundred years, unti the zeal of Constantine pulled it down, and reared in its stead a Christian shrine, to which mankind made pilgrimages as to the former. Half a century later and what do we see? The wise and philosophic emperor Julian issuing orders for the rebuilding of the Jewish temple, to counteract the mummeries which disgraced the Christian shrine, and which had filled Jerusalem with every species of debauchery and vice. “What avails it,” says Newman, in his Hebrew Monarchy (page 131) “that Solomon warned young men against foreign harlotry, when the royal preacher himself established far more hateful and disgusting impurities,” and Christians apparently still followed that fell example. We see from various sources (1 Kings xiv. 24; xv. 12-13; xxii 46; 2 Kings xxiii 7, and elsewhere) how rampant here were the worst features of Phallic Faith. Solomon’s favourite, Queen Maacha, “made a Phallus 1 See Drawings over leaf. I. Ground Plan of Temple. II. A Block Plan, in which the east and west line is shown dotted. III. A Londitudinal Section, giving the Great Tower and One Pillar, with Serpent hangings, and the Sanctuary with the IV. V. 217 Lingam-Stone of the second temple in lieu of the lost Ark. A Transverse Section of Tower and Phalli. A Landscape View as the Temple would appear on Mount Moriah when first constructed, without its after surroundings.
- Page 212 and 213: 166 Rivers of Life, or Faiths of Ma
- Page 214 and 215: 168 Rivers of Life, or Faiths of Ma
- Page 216 and 217: 170 Rivers of Life, or Faiths of Ma
- Page 218 and 219: 172 Rivers of Life, or Faiths of Ma
- Page 220 and 221: 174 Rivers of Life, or Faiths of Ma
- Page 222 and 223: 176 Rivers of Life, or Faiths of Ma
- Page 224 and 225: 178 Rivers of Life, or Faiths of Ma
- Page 226 and 227: 180 Rivers of Life, or Faiths of Ma
- Page 228 and 229: 182 Rivers of Life, or Faiths of Ma
- Page 230 and 231: 184 Rivers of Life, or Faiths of Ma
- Page 232 and 233: 186 Rivers of Life, or Faiths of Ma
- Page 234 and 235: 188 Rivers of Life, or Faiths of Ma
- Page 236 and 237: 190 Rivers of Life, or Faiths of Ma
- Page 238 and 239: 192 Rivers of Life, or Faiths of Ma
- Page 240 and 241: 194 Rivers of Life, or Faiths of Ma
- Page 242 and 243: 196 Rivers of Life, or Faiths of Ma
- Page 244 and 245: 198 Rivers of Life, or Faiths of Ma
- Page 246 and 247: 200 Rivers of Life, or Faiths of Ma
- Page 248 and 249: 202 Rivers of Life, or Faiths of Ma
- Page 250 and 251: 204 Rivers of Life, or Faiths of Ma
- Page 252 and 253: 206 Rivers of Life, or Faiths of Ma
- Page 254 and 255: 208 Rivers of Life, or Faiths of Ma
- Page 256 and 257: 210 Rivers of Life, or Faiths of Ma
- Page 258 and 259: 212 Rivers of Life, or Faiths of Ma
- Page 260 and 261: 214 Rivers of Life, or Faiths of Ma
- Page 264 and 265: 218 Rivers of Life, or Faiths of Ma
- Page 266 and 267: 220 Rivers of Life, or Faiths of Ma
- Page 268 and 269: 222 Rivers of Life, or Faiths of Ma
- Page 270 and 271: 224 Rivers of Life, or Faiths of Ma
- Page 272 and 273: 226 Rivers of Life, or Faiths of Ma
- Page 274 and 275: 228 Rivers of Life, or Faiths of Ma
- Page 276 and 277: 230 Rivers of Life, or Faiths of Ma
- Page 278 and 279: 232 Rivers of Life, or Faiths of Ma
- Page 280 and 281: 234 Rivers of Life, or Faiths of Ma
- Page 282 and 283: 236 Rivers of Life, or Faiths of Ma
- Page 284 and 285: 238 Rivers of Life, or Faiths of Ma
- Page 286 and 287: 240 Rivers of Life, or Faiths of Ma
- Page 288 and 289: 242 Rivers of Life, or Faiths of Ma
- Page 290 and 291: 244 Rivers of Life, or Faiths of Ma
- Page 292 and 293: 246 Rivers of Life, or Faiths of Ma
- Page 294 and 295: 248 Rivers of Life, or Faiths of Ma
- Page 296 and 297: 250 Rivers of Life, or Faiths of Ma
- Page 298 and 299: 252 Rivers of Life, or Faiths of Ma
- Page 300 and 301: 254 Rivers of Life, or Faiths of Ma
- Page 302 and 303: 256 Rivers of Life, or Faiths of Ma
- Page 304 and 305: 258 Rivers of Life, or Faiths of Ma
- Page 306 and 307: 260 Rivers of Life, or Faiths of Ma
- Page 308 and 309: 262 Rivers of Life, or Faiths of Ma
- Page 310 and 311: 264 Rivers of Life, or Faiths of Ma
216<br />
<strong>Rivers</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Life</strong>, or Faiths <strong>of</strong> Man in all Lands.<br />
This Molten Sea, Fig, 90. was, we are assuered, most correctly constructed. As<br />
it represented woman, so all the females <strong>of</strong> Jerusalem brought forth their most<br />
representative emblem—the Mirror—which as Maya the Sanskrit Aryan calls Illusion,<br />
a word I believe really meaning that by which man may reproduce or reflect himself.<br />
Anyhow, the mirror is a most suitable and universal emblem <strong>of</strong> Maya over all Asia; in<br />
this, Fig. 91, I show it in the form it is constantly found in the palaces and temples <strong>of</strong> the<br />
Nile. The head ornament or burden <strong>of</strong> the woman is here a Cone, similar to that which<br />
Egyptian women are usually shown with; for if Siva carries Luna, and the Agathodemon a<br />
lotus, then woman must so honour the Cone; and I believe the<br />
first occasion on which they likewise came freely forward<br />
and poured their golden trinkets into Aaron’s lap, was for the<br />
construction <strong>of</strong> such a golden Cone, and not a Calf as the<br />
LXX. translators tell us. As the Jewesses <strong>of</strong> the desert well<br />
knew their own religion and the object <strong>of</strong> their affections, so<br />
I think did those <strong>of</strong> Jerusalem know the cult they were enriching,<br />
and the sexual proclivities <strong>of</strong> their king and his very<br />
Sivaik shrine. They knew well that the large “bowl” for<br />
which they were giving those ornaments—so precious to a<br />
woman’s heart—was no mere bowl for water; justs as, I believe,<br />
their ancient mothers knew that it was no mere calf that<br />
Fig 92—EGYPTIAN MIRROR AND<br />
WOMAN<br />
Aaron made, and before which they bowed down. The word<br />
lnu, used in Exodus xxxii. as “Calf,” signifies, we are told<br />
by Parkhurst, something “Round” or “Orbicular,” as a<br />
“round ornament;” even a “round ring,” “car,” or “corn-wain,” &c. He particu-<br />
larly warns us that, as translated “Calf,” we are merely to consider this “Emblematic,”<br />
and because such, “both to believers and unbelievers and heathem, was a<br />
representative <strong>of</strong> FIRE.” “The golden calves <strong>of</strong> Aaron and Jeroboam were,”<br />
continues this very orthodox Hebraist, “set up as secondary representatives <strong>of</strong><br />
the First Person (as we speak) <strong>of</strong> the ever blessed Trinity, whose primary em-<br />
blem was FIRE. . . . . Both Aaron and Jeroboam meant their respective CALVES<br />
FOR EMBLEMS OF JEHOVAH . . . . . and each called his respective calf ALEIM,” who<br />
is the Lord and God <strong>of</strong> the Old Testament; so that the conclusion arrived at is,<br />
that Fire and Apis or Aphis were true emblems <strong>of</strong> Jehovah. In fact, we may say<br />
that this Jah was Fire and Apis; and we need not dispute, therefore, as to whether<br />
“the gold ear-rings” <strong>of</strong> the Aaronic tribes were made into a “Calf,” or, as I think, into<br />
an “orbicular” object, or “mass,” “embroyo” or “fœtus;” or into a cone which is<br />
usually called “the breaker through,” a true meaning <strong>of</strong> lnu (Fürst), and a very proper<br />
emblem for Jah, whose name, says the same great Hebraist, signifies “The Increaser”<br />
Mr. Parkhurst was probably not aware that the Hindoo called this seat <strong>of</strong> “Fire,” the<br />
Agni-Mandalam!