27.06.2013 Views

Forlong - Rivers of Life

Forlong - Rivers of Life

Forlong - Rivers of Life

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

164<br />

<strong>Rivers</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Life</strong>, or Faiths <strong>of</strong> Man in all Lands.<br />

rod which <strong>of</strong> course godly spears do, as those <strong>of</strong> Siva and Bacchus. This stone is<br />

distinctly called a witness, Latin, Testis, so we see that even Jewish translators <strong>of</strong><br />

their sacred scriptures, have here granted what I urge; for they call the Eduth before<br />

which the manna-vase was placed by the same Englih word testimony. The spear in<br />

the hands <strong>of</strong> all gods and great mythic leaders signified the obelisk or Phallic god;<br />

and Joshua, in holding up his spear as at the destruction <strong>of</strong> Ai (viii. 26) and elsewhere,<br />

is shewn as perfectly understanding and following up the Yahveh-Nissi worship, instituted<br />

by Moses after the destruction <strong>of</strong> the Amalekites. Both chiefs and people were<br />

evidently severe and relentless in human sacrifices to their Phallo-solar god, which is<br />

a pro<strong>of</strong> that he was Siva. This is manifest in the but slightly disguised story <strong>of</strong> poor<br />

Achan (Josh. vii.) and all his sons and daughters, who clearly became cherem or<br />

“devoted,” because <strong>of</strong> the first repulse <strong>of</strong> the tribes before Ai.<br />

From Joshua’s dying speech (xxiv. 14), it seems very clear that when the book bearing<br />

his name was written, the writers, <strong>of</strong> probably about the time <strong>of</strong> Manasseh—650 B.C.<br />

as we gather from such learned theologians as Bishop Colenso and Dr Davidson, did<br />

not acknowledge all the previous gods <strong>of</strong> Israel, calling them with but little respect<br />

“those (gods) which your fathers served on the other side the river,” although the<br />

people are made by those writers to say, that it is Jhavh. who brought them out <strong>of</strong><br />

Egypt. If the writer did not mean that his tribe had changed their god, then we may<br />

charitably suppose tbat they now intended to serve Jhavh spiritually, and no longer in<br />

his mere Betyl or creative symbol.<br />

Most learned men, not blinded by preconceived views indoctrinated into them in<br />

childhood, are now <strong>of</strong> opinion that Edomites, Moabites, and the mongrel and later<br />

Cana-anites and Jews were practically one people, <strong>of</strong> the Solar or Shemitic family,<br />

with always very similar social laws and customs, and therefore the same religion<br />

—that is Solar, or Shams, 1 or Shemish faiths—after they rose above the grosser<br />

Phallic ones <strong>of</strong> Betulia, and Baal-Peor and his arks. It was then they began to call<br />

their El or Elohim, Jhavh, Yehveh, or Yachveh, and Zabaoth or Tsabaoth, and became<br />

pretty tolerably pure Sabeans. Long after this, however, the mass stuck to their<br />

Matzebahs, Steli, Asheras or “Groves,” and to Kiun or Kewan <strong>of</strong> their earlier days.<br />

The Star, Molok, Serpent, and Shaft, had gradually, but very gradually only, to give<br />

way to great ’ΙΑΩ as the Greeks very properly called the later JHAVH. Not, however,<br />

till the sixth, or even fifth century B.C., did the Jews form any clear perception <strong>of</strong> the<br />

unity and omnipresence <strong>of</strong> Jhavh, or <strong>of</strong> his being the only God, and there being “none<br />

else beside him;” for though Isaiah, and Jeremiah, the probable Deuteronomist, and one<br />

or two others use thia language, yet the dates <strong>of</strong> these writings are now thrown back by<br />

the best scholars to about the time <strong>of</strong> the Captivity, or a hundred years later, <strong>of</strong> which<br />

I will speak elsewhere. The tribes were more benefitted by contact with wiser and<br />

1 In Sansk, Ksham is to “endure” or “be able,” attributes <strong>of</strong> The Sun.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!