Forlong - Rivers of Life
Forlong - Rivers of Life Forlong - Rivers of Life
142 Rivers of Life, or Faiths of Man in all Lands. but a theory based upon the evidence of feeling is as mythological as a myth itself.” 1 Grote says on this subject, that “the curtain which he, writing purely as an historian, depicts, is all the picture he has to show, but nevertheless the true picture is there, if we but contrive to lift the curtain.” Zeuses and Ios, Europas and Hellens, Titans, Toths, and gods are all history in process of incubation: we must unravel the skein and see the real actors, their acts, principles, and faiths. This being so, it is necessary to proceed very cautionsly if not suspiciously with all mythi, and especially to watch over changes, however slight, in the names of gods, temples, mountains, and rivers, as these usually denote changes of ideas if not of faiths. This has been entirely lost sight of by Christians till quite lately, and nowhere is this care more necessary than in dealing with Hebrew writings, and especially with such roots or words as El, Ja, Elohe, Yahve, Yachave, Adonai, Shadai; and AR, AD, AL, OB, AB, ABA., or ABADDON, he whom the Christo-Jewish writer of Rev. ix. 11 and xx., mentions as the then hated, though long-loved Apollyon; Abaddon, thus spoken of, marks a change from Python to a purer Solar worship, at least on the part of the writer. Clement of Alexandria 2 tells us, that the great symbol of Bacchic orgies, “is the consecrated serpent,” and that when the Bacchanals have butchered their victims and feasted, like the Jews, on raw flesh, 3 they crown themselves with snakes, and rush about shrieking “Eve, Eva, Hevia, Havvale—the female serpent.” Hevia is equivalent to Zoē, life, from, Greek “to live;” thus what is called “the fall,” ascribed to Eva, or Hevia the female, and Adam the male, becomes in reality the acts connected with germination, conceptiom and procluction, and the destruction of virginity—regarding which the Jews had very unhallowed ideas. Everything sexual was held by the pious as irreligious, and indulgence was “listening to the voice of the charmer.” Adam “fell” from listening to Eve, and she from the serpent tempting her—details which merely assure us, that we have procreative acts signified in all stories regarding Hawa (in Hindostani, Wind, Lust, Air—Juno) and Chavah or Eve, or as the Arabs called it Hayyat, life or “creation.” “Eating forbidden fruit was simply a figurative mode of expressing the performance of the act necessary for the perpetuation of the human race, an act which in its origin was thought to be the source of all evil.” 4 In the myth of Pandora the gods are represented as enraged at the creative act of Prometheus; and so even yet, as in all past times, a large and influential class of religionists have preached against the legitimate and healthy acts of marital intercourse, as tending to lower and defile the spiritual nature of both man and woman. In all such ideas it would seem as if the Zoroastrians had been the leaders, at least in Western Asia, The Aryan writers of the Zoroastrian faith undoubtedly held that the procreative 1 2 India in Greece. “Ante-Nicene Library,” iv. p. 27. 3 Ex. xxxii., which describes a veritable Saturnalia; also Anc. Faiths, I., 565. 4 “Anthropological Journal, July 1870, p. 102. Hawá is also Eve in Hindostani.
Serpent and Phallic Worship. act, was a “fall,” or grievous if not mortal sin. The Bound-de-hesch saya (9th Yakna v. 27), that Meschi A, and Meschi Ane, that is A and Ane, were seduced by Ahriman in the form of a serpent, although. the wise writers possibly only meant that A or Ar, the Sun, caused warmth which produced fertility, and did not mean their allegory to be crystallized into a hard and fast story, as the illiterate dwellers in Syria did, and after them Europe. All Asiatics looked on Sun and Serpent as at times almost interchangeable terms, but it remained for Jews and Christians to showthe Sun, or Jhavh, as the worse Deity of the two, the bestower of curses and of death, and of a blessing— labour, though he gave it also to us as a curse. The Serpent remained in the memory and affections of most early people as wisdom, life, goodness, and the source of knowledge and science, under various names, such as Toth, Hermes, Themis, the Kneph or Sophia of Egyptians and Gnostics, and Set, Shet, or Shem of the Jews. Even the Mexican tells us that he, the Serpent, is the Sun, Tonakatl-Koatl, who ever accompanied their “first woman”—the woman “of our flesh;” their “primitive mother they said was Kihua-Kohuatl, which signifies a serpent.” 1 So that the serpent here was represented as both Adam and Adāma; and their Eden, as in the Jewish story, was “a garden of love” or “pleasure.” Truly, writes Mr Stanisland Wake, Vice-President of the Anthropological Society of London, “the fundamental basis of Christianity is more purely Phallic than that of any other religion now existing, and its emotional nature . . . shows how intimately it was related to the older faiths which had a Phallic basis.” 2 The italics are mine. Quite in keeping with the Jewish idea of man and woman becoming debased on “knowing” each other, or “their nakedness,” is that habit—still prevalent in many lands—of self-mutilation “for the kingdom of heaven’s sake” (Matt. xix. 12); a doctrine which Christianity has probably carried to a more injurious extent than any other faith. Asiatics have rather yielded to the vice as a provision for life, equivalent to a caste or profession, or because they were in youth dedicated to a goddess as the Dea Syria or Phrygian Kubele, than for conscience or religion’s sake. Fathers of the Church, as Origen, Valentine, and a host of followers, set the fell example which in time emasculated and enervated the power of the great eastern and western empires, until the once invincible legions of Rome were no longer a terror to any nation—a matter which I will hereafter consider when speaking of the degrading asceticism introduced by Christianity. Thousands more than we can number, women as well as men it appears, and fervid Christians, still follow out this frenzy! In the Russian Skoptsi sect (from Skopet to castrate) we are told that many hundreds thus annually butcher themselves, and all for that wretched text which not one of the poor souls, nor indeed anyone else, knows who wrote or when. These Christian fanatics teach that 1 “Serpent Symbol in America,” by E. G. Squier, M.A., as quoted in “Anthropological Journal,” July 1870. 2 “Anthropological Journal,” July 1870, p. 226. 143
- Page 138 and 139: 96 Rivers of Life, or Faiths of Man
- Page 140: 98 Rivers of Life, or Faiths of Man
- Page 144 and 145: 100 Rivers of Life, or Faiths of Ma
- Page 146 and 147: 102 Rivers of Life, or Faiths of Ma
- Page 148: 104 Rivers of Life, or Faiths of Ma
- Page 152 and 153: 106 Rivers of Life, or Faiths of Ma
- Page 154 and 155: 108 Rivers of Life, or Faiths of Ma
- Page 156 and 157: 110 Rivers of Life, or Faiths of Ma
- Page 158 and 159: 112 Rivers of Life, or Faiths of Ma
- Page 160 and 161: 114 Rivers of Life, or Faiths of Ma
- Page 162 and 163: 116 Rivers of Life, or Faiths of Ma
- Page 164 and 165: 118 Rivers of Life, or Faiths of Ma
- Page 166 and 167: 120 Rivers of Life, or Faiths of Ma
- Page 168 and 169: 122 Rivers of Life, or Faiths of Ma
- Page 170 and 171: 124 Rivers of Life, or Faiths of Ma
- Page 172 and 173: 126 Rivers of Life, or Faiths of Ma
- Page 174 and 175: 128 Rivers of Life, or Faiths of Ma
- Page 176 and 177: 130 Rivers of Life, or Faiths of Ma
- Page 178 and 179: 132 Rivers of Life, or Faiths of Ma
- Page 180 and 181: 134 Rivers of Life, or Faiths of Ma
- Page 182 and 183: 136 Rivers of Life, or Faiths of Ma
- Page 184 and 185: 138 Rivers of Life, or Faiths of Ma
- Page 186 and 187: 140 Rivers of Life, or Faiths of Ma
- Page 190 and 191: 144 Rivers of Life, or Faiths of Ma
- Page 192 and 193: 146 Rivers of Life, or Faiths of Ma
- Page 194 and 195: 148 Rivers of Life, or Faiths of Ma
- Page 196 and 197: 150 Rivers of Life, or Faiths of Ma
- Page 198 and 199: 152 Rivers of Life, or Faiths of Ma
- Page 200 and 201: 154 Rivers of Life, or Faiths of Ma
- Page 202 and 203: 156 Rivers of Life, or Faiths of Ma
- Page 204 and 205: 158 Rivers of Life, or Faiths of Ma
- Page 206 and 207: 160 Rivers of Life, or Faiths of Ma
- Page 208 and 209: 162 Rivers of Life, or Faiths of Ma
- Page 210 and 211: 164 Rivers of Life, or Faiths of Ma
- Page 212 and 213: 166 Rivers of Life, or Faiths of Ma
- Page 214 and 215: 168 Rivers of Life, or Faiths of Ma
- Page 216 and 217: 170 Rivers of Life, or Faiths of Ma
- Page 218 and 219: 172 Rivers of Life, or Faiths of Ma
- Page 220 and 221: 174 Rivers of Life, or Faiths of Ma
- Page 222 and 223: 176 Rivers of Life, or Faiths of Ma
- Page 224 and 225: 178 Rivers of Life, or Faiths of Ma
- Page 226 and 227: 180 Rivers of Life, or Faiths of Ma
- Page 228 and 229: 182 Rivers of Life, or Faiths of Ma
- Page 230 and 231: 184 Rivers of Life, or Faiths of Ma
- Page 232 and 233: 186 Rivers of Life, or Faiths of Ma
- Page 234 and 235: 188 Rivers of Life, or Faiths of Ma
- Page 236 and 237: 190 Rivers of Life, or Faiths of Ma
142<br />
<strong>Rivers</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Life</strong>, or Faiths <strong>of</strong> Man in all Lands.<br />
but a theory based upon the evidence <strong>of</strong> feeling is as mythological as a myth itself.” 1<br />
Grote says on this subject, that “the curtain which he, writing purely as an historian,<br />
depicts, is all the picture he has to show, but nevertheless the true picture is there, if<br />
we but contrive to lift the curtain.” Zeuses and Ios, Europas and Hellens, Titans,<br />
Toths, and gods are all history in process <strong>of</strong> incubation: we must unravel the skein<br />
and see the real actors, their acts, principles, and faiths.<br />
This being so, it is necessary to proceed very cautionsly if not suspiciously with<br />
all mythi, and especially to watch over changes, however slight, in the names <strong>of</strong> gods,<br />
temples, mountains, and rivers, as these usually denote changes <strong>of</strong> ideas if not <strong>of</strong><br />
faiths. This has been entirely lost sight <strong>of</strong> by Christians till quite lately, and nowhere<br />
is this care more necessary than in dealing with Hebrew writings, and especially with<br />
such roots or words as El, Ja, Elohe, Yahve, Yachave, Adonai, Shadai; and AR, AD,<br />
AL, OB, AB, ABA., or ABADDON, he whom the Christo-Jewish writer <strong>of</strong> Rev. ix. 11<br />
and xx., mentions as the then hated, though long-loved Apollyon; Abaddon, thus spoken<br />
<strong>of</strong>, marks a change from Python to a purer Solar worship, at least on the part <strong>of</strong> the<br />
writer. Clement <strong>of</strong> Alexandria 2 tells us, that the great symbol <strong>of</strong> Bacchic orgies, “is<br />
the consecrated serpent,” and that when the Bacchanals have butchered their victims<br />
and feasted, like the Jews, on raw flesh, 3 they crown themselves with snakes, and rush<br />
about shrieking “Eve, Eva, Hevia, Havvale—the female serpent.” Hevia is equivalent<br />
to Zoē, life, from, Greek “to live;” thus what is called “the fall,” ascribed to Eva,<br />
or Hevia the female, and Adam the male, becomes in reality the acts connected with<br />
germination, conceptiom and procluction, and the destruction <strong>of</strong> virginity—regarding<br />
which the Jews had very unhallowed ideas. Everything sexual was held by the pious<br />
as irreligious, and indulgence was “listening to the voice <strong>of</strong> the charmer.” Adam “fell”<br />
from listening to Eve, and she from the serpent tempting her—details which merely<br />
assure us, that we have procreative acts signified in all stories regarding Hawa (in<br />
Hindostani, Wind, Lust, Air—Juno) and Chavah or Eve, or as the Arabs called it<br />
Hayyat, life or “creation.” “Eating forbidden fruit was simply a figurative mode <strong>of</strong><br />
expressing the performance <strong>of</strong> the act necessary for the perpetuation <strong>of</strong> the human<br />
race, an act which in its origin was thought to be the source <strong>of</strong> all evil.” 4 In the<br />
myth <strong>of</strong> Pandora the gods are represented as enraged at the creative act <strong>of</strong> Prometheus;<br />
and so even yet, as in all past times, a large and influential class <strong>of</strong> religionists<br />
have preached against the legitimate and healthy acts <strong>of</strong> marital intercourse, as tending<br />
to lower and defile the spiritual nature <strong>of</strong> both man and woman. In all such<br />
ideas it would seem as if the Zoroastrians had been the leaders, at least in Western<br />
Asia,<br />
The Aryan writers <strong>of</strong> the Zoroastrian faith undoubtedly held that the procreative<br />
1 2<br />
India in Greece.<br />
“Ante-Nicene Library,” iv. p. 27.<br />
3<br />
Ex. xxxii., which describes a veritable Saturnalia; also Anc. Faiths, I., 565.<br />
4<br />
“Anthropological Journal, July 1870, p. 102. Hawá is also Eve in Hindostani.