27.06.2013 Views

Equinox I (04).pdf

Equinox I (04).pdf

Equinox I (04).pdf

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

134<br />

THE EQUINOX<br />

is non-existent. Each man is, as it were, a thought in an<br />

universal brain, each thought jarring against the next and<br />

prolonging the dream. As each individual thought dies it<br />

enters Nibbâna and ceases to be, and eventually when all<br />

thoughts die the dream passes and Nibbâna wakes.* This<br />

bad dream seems to be caused by a separateness of Subject<br />

and Object which means Sorrow; when sleep vanished this<br />

separateness vanishes with it, things assume their correct<br />

proportion and may be equated to a state of bliss or non-<br />

Sorrow.<br />

Thus we find that Nirvana and Nibbâna are the same† in<br />

* Comapre “Mândûkya Upanishad,” 1, 16.<br />

In the infinite illusion of the universe<br />

The soul sleeps; when it awakes<br />

Then there wakes the Eternal,<br />

Free from time and sleep and dreams.<br />

† Most Buddhists will raise a terrific howl when they read this; but, in spite<br />

of their statement that the Hindu Nirvana, the absorption into Brahman,<br />

corresponds not with their Nibbâna, but with their fourth Arûpa-Vimokha, we<br />

nevertheless maintain, that in essence Nirvana and Nibbâna are the same, or in<br />

detail, if logic is necessary in so illogical an argument, it certainly sided rather<br />

with Nirvana than Nibbâna. Nibbâna is Final says the Buddhist, when once an<br />

individual enters it there is no getting out again, in fact a kind of Spiritual Bastille,<br />

for it is Niccain, changeless; but Brahman is certainly not this, for all things in<br />

the Universe originated from him. This is as it should be, though we see little<br />

difference between proceeding from to proceeding to, when it comes to a matter<br />

of First and Last Causes. The only reason why the Buddhist does not fall into the<br />

snare, is, not because he has explained away Brahman, but because he refuses to<br />

discuss him at all. Further the Buddhist argues that should the Hindu even<br />

attain by the exaltation of his selfhood to Arûpa Brahma-loka, though for a<br />

period incalculable he would endure there, yet in the end Karma would once<br />

again exert its sway over him, “and he would die as an Arûpabrahmaloka-<br />

Deva, his Sankhâras giving rise to a being according to the nature of his unexhausted<br />

Karma.” In “Buddhism,” vol. i, No. 2, p. 323, we read: “To put it<br />

another way; you say that the Universe came from Brahman, and that at one

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!