Hinton - The Fourth Dimension.pdf
Hinton - The Fourth Dimension.pdf Hinton - The Fourth Dimension.pdf
206 THE FOURTH DIMENSION on a plane; and when we set about to form the conception of motion in four dimensions, we find that there is at least as great a step as from the plane to threedimensional space. I do not say that the step is difficult, but I want to point out that it must be taken. When we have formed the conception of four-dimensional motion, we can ask a rational question of Nature. Before we have elaborated our conceptions we are asking if an unknown is like an unknown—a futile inquiry. As a matter of fact, four-dimensional movements are in every way simple and more easy to calculate than threedimensional movements, for four-dimensional movements are simply two sets of plane movements put together. Without the formation of an experience of fourdimensional bodies, their shapes and motions, the subject can be but formal—logically conclusive, not intuitively evident. It is to this logical apprehension that I must appeal. It is perfectly simple to form an experiential familiarity with the facts of four-dimensional movement. The method is analogous to that which a plane being would have to adopt to form an experiential familiarity with three-dimensional movements, and may be briefly summed up as the formation of a compound sense by means of which duration is regarded as equivalent to extension. Consider a being confined to a plane. A square enclosed by four lines will be to him a solid, the interior of which can only be examined by breaking through the lines. If such a square were to pass transverse to his plane, it would immediately disappear. It would vanish, going in no direction to which he could point. If, now, a cube be placed in contact with his plane, its surface of contact would appear like the square which we
RECAPITULATION AND EXTENSION 207 have just mentioned. But if it were to pass transverse to his plane, breaking through it, it would appear as a lasting square. The three-dimensional matter will give a lasting appearance in circumstances under which two-dimensional matter will at once disappear. Similarly, a four-dimensional cube, or, as we may call it, a tesseract, which is generated from a cube by a movement of every part of the cube in a fourth dimension at right angles to each of the three visible directions in the cube, if it moved transverse to our space, would appear as a lasting cube. A cube of three-dimensional matter, since it extends to no distance at all in the fourth dimension, would instantly disappear, if subjected to a motion transverse to our space. It would disappear and be gone, without it being possible to point to any direction in which it had moved. All attempts to visualise a fourth dimension are futile. It must be connected with a time experience in three space. The most difficult notion for a plane being to acquire would be that of rotation about a line. Consider a plane being facing a square. If he were told that rotation about a line were possible, he would move his square this way and that. A square in a plane can rotate about a point, but to rotate about a line would seem to the plane being perfectly impossible. How could those parts of his square which were on one side of an edge come to the other side without the edge moving? He could understand their reflection in the edge. He could form an idea of the looking-glass image of his square lying on the opposite side of the line of an edge, but by no motion that he knows of can he make the actual square assume that position. The result of the rotation would be like reflection in the edge, but it would be a physical impossibility to produce it in the plane. The demonstration of rotation about a line must be to
- Page 165 and 166: NOMENCLATURE AND ANALOGIES 155 lie
- Page 167 and 168: CHAPTER XII THE SIMPLEST FOUR-DIMEN
- Page 169 and 170: THE SIMPLEST FOUR-DIMENSIONAL SOLID
- Page 171 and 172: THE SIMPLEST FOUR-DIMENSIONAL SOLID
- Page 173 and 174: THE SIMPLEST FOUR-DIMENSIONAL SOLID
- Page 175 and 176: THE SIMPLEST FOUR-DIMENSIONAL SOLID
- Page 177 and 178: THE SIMPLEST FOUR-DIMENSIONAL SOLID
- Page 179 and 180: THE SIMPLEST FOUR-DIMENSIONAL SOLID
- Page 181 and 182: THE SIMPLEST FOUR-DIMENSIONAL SOLID
- Page 183 and 184: THE SIMPLEST FOUR-DIMENSIONAL SOLID
- Page 185 and 186: Purple Red THE SIMPLEST FOUR-DIMENS
- Page 187 and 188: Light blue Gren Light purple THE SI
- Page 189 and 190: REMARKS ON THE FIGURES 179 ochre cu
- Page 191 and 192: REMARKS ON THE FIGURES 181 for it i
- Page 193 and 194: REMARKS ON THE FIGURES 183 that is
- Page 195 and 196: REMARKS ON THE FIGURES 185 yellow l
- Page 197 and 198: REMARKS ON THE FIGURES 187 As the r
- Page 199 and 200: REMARKS ON THE FIGURES 189 cubes, w
- Page 201 and 202: 4 4 REMARKS ON THE FIGURES 191 The
- Page 203 and 204: REMARKS ON THE FIGURES 193 face or
- Page 205 and 206: REMARKS ON THE FIGURES 195 face in
- Page 207 and 208: REMARKS ON THE FIGURES 197 space, a
- Page 209 and 210: REMARKS ON THE FIGURES 199 Hence wh
- Page 211 and 212: REMARKS ON THE FIGURES 201 sections
- Page 213 and 214: CHAPTER XIV * A RECAPITULATION AND
- Page 215: RECAPITULATION AND EXTENSION 205 ou
- Page 219 and 220: RECAPITULATION AND EXTENSION 209 Bu
- Page 221 and 222: RECAPITULATION AND EXTENSION 211 We
- Page 223 and 224: RECAPITULATION AND EXTENSION 213 Th
- Page 225 and 226: RECAPITULATION AND EXTENSION 215 th
- Page 227 and 228: RECAPITULATION AND EXTENSION 217 In
- Page 229 and 230: RECAPITULATION AND EXTENSION 219 th
- Page 231 and 232: RECAPITULATION AND EXTENSION 221 ta
- Page 233 and 234: RECAPITULATION AND EXTENSION 223 If
- Page 235 and 236: RECAPITULATION AND EXTENSION 225 th
- Page 237 and 238: RECAPITULATION AND EXTENSION 227 di
- Page 239 and 240: RECAPITULATION AND EXTENSION 229 If
- Page 241 and 242: APPENDIX I THE MODELS IN Chapter XI
- Page 243 and 244: APPENDIX I: THE MODELS 233 in an op
- Page 245 and 246: APPENDIX I: THE MODELS 235 would be
- Page 247 and 248: APPENDIX I: THE MODELS 237 have to
- Page 249 and 250: APPENDIX I: THE MODELS 239 can be u
- Page 251 and 252: APPENDIX I: THE MODELS 241 The four
- Page 253 and 254: APPENDIX I: THE MODELS 243 orange f
- Page 255 and 256: APPENDIX I: THE MODELS 245 we make
- Page 257 and 258: APPENDIX I: THE MODELS 247 sponding
- Page 259 and 260: APPENDIX II: A LANGUAGE OF SPACE 24
- Page 261 and 262: APPENDIX II: A LANGUAGE OF SPACE 25
- Page 263 and 264: APPENDIX II: A LANGUAGE OF SPACE 25
- Page 265 and 266: APPENDIX II: A LANGUAGE OF SPACE 25
RECAPITULATION AND EXTENSION 207<br />
have just mentioned. But if it were to pass transverse to<br />
his plane, breaking through it, it would appear as a lasting<br />
square. <strong>The</strong> three-dimensional matter will give a lasting<br />
appearance in circumstances under which two-dimensional<br />
matter will at once disappear.<br />
Similarly, a four-dimensional cube, or, as we may call<br />
it, a tesseract, which is generated from a cube by a<br />
movement of every part of the cube in a fourth dimension<br />
at right angles to each of the three visible directions in<br />
the cube, if it moved transverse to our space, would<br />
appear as a lasting cube.<br />
A cube of three-dimensional matter, since it extends to<br />
no distance at all in the fourth dimension, would instantly<br />
disappear, if subjected to a motion transverse to our space.<br />
It would disappear and be gone, without it being possible<br />
to point to any direction in which it had moved.<br />
All attempts to visualise a fourth dimension are futile. It<br />
must be connected with a time experience in three space.<br />
<strong>The</strong> most difficult notion for a plane being to acquire<br />
would be that of rotation about a line. Consider a plane<br />
being facing a square. If he were told that rotation<br />
about a line were possible, he would move his square this<br />
way and that. A square in a plane can rotate about a<br />
point, but to rotate about a line would seem to the plane<br />
being perfectly impossible. How could those parts of his<br />
square which were on one side of an edge come to the<br />
other side without the edge moving? He could understand<br />
their reflection in the edge. He could form an<br />
idea of the looking-glass image of his square lying on the<br />
opposite side of the line of an edge, but by no motion<br />
that he knows of can he make the actual square assume<br />
that position. <strong>The</strong> result of the rotation would be like<br />
reflection in the edge, but it would be a physical impossibility<br />
to produce it in the plane.<br />
<strong>The</strong> demonstration of rotation about a line must be to