Hinton - The Fourth Dimension.pdf

Hinton - The Fourth Dimension.pdf Hinton - The Fourth Dimension.pdf

93beast.fea.st
from 93beast.fea.st More from this publisher
27.06.2013 Views

206 THE FOURTH DIMENSION on a plane; and when we set about to form the conception of motion in four dimensions, we find that there is at least as great a step as from the plane to threedimensional space. I do not say that the step is difficult, but I want to point out that it must be taken. When we have formed the conception of four-dimensional motion, we can ask a rational question of Nature. Before we have elaborated our conceptions we are asking if an unknown is like an unknown—a futile inquiry. As a matter of fact, four-dimensional movements are in every way simple and more easy to calculate than threedimensional movements, for four-dimensional movements are simply two sets of plane movements put together. Without the formation of an experience of fourdimensional bodies, their shapes and motions, the subject can be but formal—logically conclusive, not intuitively evident. It is to this logical apprehension that I must appeal. It is perfectly simple to form an experiential familiarity with the facts of four-dimensional movement. The method is analogous to that which a plane being would have to adopt to form an experiential familiarity with three-dimensional movements, and may be briefly summed up as the formation of a compound sense by means of which duration is regarded as equivalent to extension. Consider a being confined to a plane. A square enclosed by four lines will be to him a solid, the interior of which can only be examined by breaking through the lines. If such a square were to pass transverse to his plane, it would immediately disappear. It would vanish, going in no direction to which he could point. If, now, a cube be placed in contact with his plane, its surface of contact would appear like the square which we

RECAPITULATION AND EXTENSION 207 have just mentioned. But if it were to pass transverse to his plane, breaking through it, it would appear as a lasting square. The three-dimensional matter will give a lasting appearance in circumstances under which two-dimensional matter will at once disappear. Similarly, a four-dimensional cube, or, as we may call it, a tesseract, which is generated from a cube by a movement of every part of the cube in a fourth dimension at right angles to each of the three visible directions in the cube, if it moved transverse to our space, would appear as a lasting cube. A cube of three-dimensional matter, since it extends to no distance at all in the fourth dimension, would instantly disappear, if subjected to a motion transverse to our space. It would disappear and be gone, without it being possible to point to any direction in which it had moved. All attempts to visualise a fourth dimension are futile. It must be connected with a time experience in three space. The most difficult notion for a plane being to acquire would be that of rotation about a line. Consider a plane being facing a square. If he were told that rotation about a line were possible, he would move his square this way and that. A square in a plane can rotate about a point, but to rotate about a line would seem to the plane being perfectly impossible. How could those parts of his square which were on one side of an edge come to the other side without the edge moving? He could understand their reflection in the edge. He could form an idea of the looking-glass image of his square lying on the opposite side of the line of an edge, but by no motion that he knows of can he make the actual square assume that position. The result of the rotation would be like reflection in the edge, but it would be a physical impossibility to produce it in the plane. The demonstration of rotation about a line must be to

RECAPITULATION AND EXTENSION 207<br />

have just mentioned. But if it were to pass transverse to<br />

his plane, breaking through it, it would appear as a lasting<br />

square. <strong>The</strong> three-dimensional matter will give a lasting<br />

appearance in circumstances under which two-dimensional<br />

matter will at once disappear.<br />

Similarly, a four-dimensional cube, or, as we may call<br />

it, a tesseract, which is generated from a cube by a<br />

movement of every part of the cube in a fourth dimension<br />

at right angles to each of the three visible directions in<br />

the cube, if it moved transverse to our space, would<br />

appear as a lasting cube.<br />

A cube of three-dimensional matter, since it extends to<br />

no distance at all in the fourth dimension, would instantly<br />

disappear, if subjected to a motion transverse to our space.<br />

It would disappear and be gone, without it being possible<br />

to point to any direction in which it had moved.<br />

All attempts to visualise a fourth dimension are futile. It<br />

must be connected with a time experience in three space.<br />

<strong>The</strong> most difficult notion for a plane being to acquire<br />

would be that of rotation about a line. Consider a plane<br />

being facing a square. If he were told that rotation<br />

about a line were possible, he would move his square this<br />

way and that. A square in a plane can rotate about a<br />

point, but to rotate about a line would seem to the plane<br />

being perfectly impossible. How could those parts of his<br />

square which were on one side of an edge come to the<br />

other side without the edge moving? He could understand<br />

their reflection in the edge. He could form an<br />

idea of the looking-glass image of his square lying on the<br />

opposite side of the line of an edge, but by no motion<br />

that he knows of can he make the actual square assume<br />

that position. <strong>The</strong> result of the rotation would be like<br />

reflection in the edge, but it would be a physical impossibility<br />

to produce it in the plane.<br />

<strong>The</strong> demonstration of rotation about a line must be to

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!